No UC admissions data on file for Summit Preparatory Charter High.
This school doesn't appear in UCOP's source-school records (it may send few or no applicants to UC). Its enrollment trend and similar-school comparison are still below.
Summit Preparatory Charter High
· San Mateo County · Sequoia Union High · Public
📄 Shareable scorecard →Compare with peers
Most similar nearby schools
Aspire East Palo Alto Charter → Everest Public High School → Circle of Independent Learning → Design Tech High School → East Palo Alto Academy → Compare all similar →📋 At a glance
- Program details not reported to CRDC
- Academic signals not yet ingested for this school
Composed from federal CRDC offerings, EDFacts ACGR, and other public data. Full breakdowns below.
How Summit Preparatory Charter High compares for families
What families should know about Summit Preparatory Charter High.
- ▸ vs Similar SchoolsThe closest comparables nearby: Aspire East Palo Alto Charter, Everest Public High School, Circle of Independent Learning and 2 more. See the sidebar to compare side-by-side.
SBAC academic outcomes — grade 11, 2025
Share of grade-11 students meeting or exceeding the California standard on Smarter Balanced ELA and Math. This is the academic-readiness signal that pairs with UC Reach (post-grad outcomes), stability (retention), and absenteeism (engagement). Note: statewide median Math is only ~20% — a school at 20% isn't an outlier; one at 45%+ genuinely is.
Source: California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) Smarter Balanced research files. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥30 tested students.
Student composition — 2025-26
HS grades 9–12 racial/ethnic composition and program subgroups, from CDE Census Day Enrollment. Two-year shift shown when ≥1 pt — surfaces how the community served has changed since 2023-24.
Race / ethnicity
Program subgroups
Source: California Department of Education, Census Day Enrollment 2025-26 (HS grades 9–12). Δ shown when shift is ≥1 pt since 2023-24. Categories below 0.5% omitted.
Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25
Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: grades 9–12.
Absenteeism is up 16.3 pp since 2016-17. A rising absenteeism trend often precedes formal departure — worth investigating which subgroups are driving it.
Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).
Enrollment trend & projection
If this trend holds (-1.2%/yr, Total enrollment)
At per-pupil funding of $ / student:
| Horizon | Projected Total enrollment | Change | Funding impact / yr |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 yr (2027) | ~376 | -4 | $0 |
| 3 yr (2029) | ~367 | -13 | $0 |
| 5 yr (2031) | ~359 | -21 | $0 |
Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.
Summit Preparatory Charter High — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot
Public · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools
- ▸Senior-class enrollment is up 38% (101→139 from 2018 to 2026), outpacing the peer-group median of -24%.
- ▸At its recent rate (-1.2%/yr), enrollment projects to ~367 by 2029 — about 13 fewer students than today.
Enrollment projection
That's about 13 fewer students. At per-student funding of $ per student, that's roughly $0 in annual state funding at risk.
Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423 per ADA) — adjust to your district's actual per-pupil figure. Projection extrapolates the recent annual rate — not a forecast of intent.
Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools
| School | Type | Size | UC Reach | Enroll. trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Summit Preparatory Charter High | Public | 380 | — | +38% |
| Peer-group median | 8.3% | -24% | ||
| Aspire East Palo Alto Charter | Public | 449 | — | -46% |
| Everest Public High School | Public | 224 | 11.5% | -46% |
| Circle of Independent Learning | Public | 384 | 8.3% | -16% |
| Design Tech High School | Public | 563 | 69.6% | +2% |
| East Palo Alto Academy | Public | 245 | 4.4% | -9% |
| Tide Academy | Public | 199 | 10.3% | -43% |
| Connecting Waters Charter - East Bay | Public | 518 | — | +244% |
| Kipp Esperanza High School | Public | 178 | 7.0% | -39% |
| Redwood High | Public | 157 | — | -32% |
| Hayward Twin Oaks Montessori | Public | 583 | 7.3% | +56% |
UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →
Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25
Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the San Mateo County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.
On the surface Summit Preparatory Charter High looks fine — enrollment is +37.6% vs. San Mateo County -5.3%, and 92.1% of students stay through year-end. But <strong>chronic absenteeism is at 33.1%, up +16.3 pts since 2016-17 (county median 20.3%). Disengagement leads departure — families pull back from the day-to-day before they formally leave. The demand signal usually follows within 2–3 years.
24 of 302 students who enrolled at Summit Preparatory Charter High this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (7.9% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.
Stability by student group
Nearest peer high schools
Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.
District financial profile — Sequoia Union High (FY2020)
From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.
Local: 79.5%
Federal: 3.9%
Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the Sequoia Union High as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).