Redwood High

· San Mateo County · Sequoia Union High
Public San Mateo County 🏛 Sequoia Union High → CDS 4169062…
📄 Shareable scorecard →

Compare with peers

Most similar nearby schools

Tide Academy → Kipp Esperanza High School → Everest Public High School → Peninsula High (continuation) → Robertson High (continuation) → Compare all similar →

No UC admissions data on file for Redwood High.

This school doesn't appear in UCOP's source-school records (it may send few or no applicants to UC). Its enrollment trend and similar-school comparison are still below.

Enrollment trend & projection

Total enrollment (9–12)
222 (2018)157 (2026)
-29.3%
Grade 12 (graduating class)
166 (2018)112 (2026)
-32.5%

If this trend holds (-4.2%/yr, Total enrollment)

At per-pupil funding of $ / student:

Horizon Projected Total enrollment Change Funding impact / yr
1 yr (2027) ~150 -7 $0
3 yr (2029) ~138 -19 $0
5 yr (2031) ~126 -31 $0

Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.

Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25

Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the San Mateo County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.

Critical
Compounding decline on both vectors.

Enrollment -32.5% vs. county -5.3% AND stability (41.3%) below the county median. Recruitment and retention both under pressure — likely a foundational rather than tactical problem. Chronic absenteeism is also at 80.8% (up -11.1 pts from 2016-17) — engagement and demand are both signaling decline.

-32.5%  school enrollment (2018–2026)
-5.3%  San Mateo County baseline
-27.2pp  gap vs. county
41.3%  retention (county median 93.0%)
Enrollment — indexed to 100 at 2018
Stability rate by year (raw %)
Stability rate
41.3%
105 of 254 students

149 of 254 students who enrolled at Redwood High this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (58.7% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.

San Mateo County median
93.0% · school is in the 11th percentile of 28 HS
Statewide median
87.2% · in the 13th percentile of 1,688 HS

Stability by student group

Hispanic / Latino (215) 44.7%
Socio. disadvantaged (211) 40.3%
English learners (85) 45.9%
Students w/ disabilities (50) 34.0%

Nearest peer high schools

Tide Academy 95.4% Kipp Esperanza High School 82.8% Everest Public High School 89.7% Peninsula High (continuation) 62.6% Robertson High (continuation) 33.2%

Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.

Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25

Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: grades 9–12.

Chronic absent
80.8%
198 of 245 students

Absenteeism is down 11.1 pp since 2016-17. Engagement improving — a positive trajectory worth understanding and reinforcing.

San Mateo County median
20.1% · school is worse than 96% of 28 HS
Statewide median
22.9%
Chronic absenteeism by year (raw %)

Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).

SBAC academic outcomes — grade 11, 2025

Share of grade-11 students meeting or exceeding the California standard on Smarter Balanced ELA and Math. This is the academic-readiness signal that pairs with UC Reach (post-grad outcomes), stability (retention), and absenteeism (engagement). Note: statewide median Math is only ~20% — a school at 20% isn't an outlier; one at 45%+ genuinely is.

ELA — met or exceeded
n = 72
12.5%
incl. 0.0% exceeded
-47.5 pts vs. San Mateo County median (60.0%) · CA median 54.3% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 79.3%
Math — met or exceeded
n = 71
0.0%
incl. 0.0% exceeded
-32.5 pts vs. San Mateo County median (32.5%) · CA median 21.1% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 53.6%

Source: California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) Smarter Balanced research files. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥30 tested students.

Student composition — 2025-26

HS grades 9–12 racial/ethnic composition and program subgroups, from CDE Census Day Enrollment. Two-year shift shown when ≥1 pt — surfaces how the community served has changed since 2023-24.

Race / ethnicity

Hispanic / Latino 87% +1.2
White 5% +3.0
Pacific Islander 3% -4.6
Two or more 2% +1.5
Black / African Am. 2%
Asian 1%

Program subgroups

Students w/ disabilities 85% +5.2
English learners 29% -2.0
Socioeconomically disadv. 15% +1.6

Source: California Department of Education, Census Day Enrollment 2025-26 (HS grades 9–12). Δ shown when shift is ≥1 pt since 2023-24. Categories below 0.5% omitted.

District financial profile — Sequoia Union High (FY2020)

From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.

Total revenue
$274.6M
+23.6% since FY2017
Per-pupil revenue
$29,134
9,424 students enrolled
Revenue mix
State: 16.6%
Local: 79.5%
Federal: 3.9%
Instruction share
53.6%
of current spending · $11,688/pupil
Long-term debt
$494.2M
+37.6% since FY2017
Total revenue by year ($M)
Total expenditure by year ($M)

Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the Sequoia Union High as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).

Redwood High — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot

Public · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools

  • Senior-class enrollment is down 32% (166→112 from 2018 to 2026), trailing the peer-group median of -14%.
  • At its recent rate (-4.2%/yr), enrollment projects to ~138 by 2029 — about 19 fewer students than today.

Enrollment projection

157 students (2026)
~138 projected (2029)
at -4.2%/yr

That's about 19 fewer students. At per-student funding of $ per student, that's roughly $0 in annual state funding at risk.

Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423 per ADA) — adjust to your district's actual per-pupil figure. Projection extrapolates the recent annual rate — not a forecast of intent.

Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools

School Type Size UC Reach Enroll. trend
Redwood High Public 157 -32%
Peer-group median 10.3% -14%
Tide Academy Public 199 10.3% -43%
Kipp Esperanza High School Public 178 7.0% -39%
Everest Public High School Public 224 11.5% -46%
Peninsula High (continuation) Public 119 -19%
Robertson High (continuation) Public 162 +1%
East Palo Alto Academy Public 245 4.4% -9%
East Bay Arts Public 144 -2%
Brenkwitz High Public 139 -35%
Opportunity Academy Public 202 +450%
Mission Early College High Sch Public 190 40.7% +92%

UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →

Is your school winning the families it should?

An Enrollment Trend Audit benchmarks your enrollment against nearby schools, shows who's gaining and losing families, and lays out a plan to make families choose you — built around the outcomes your families value. Built for principals, heads of school, and district leaders.

Request an Enrollment Trend Audit →