Kipp King Collegiate High Sch
San Lorenzo · Alameda County · Public
Compare with peers
Most similar nearby schools
Impact Academy Of Arts & Technology → Madison Park Academy 6-12 → Castlemont High School → Lodestar: A Lighthouse Community Charter Public → Hayward Twin Oaks Montessori → Compare all similar →📋 At a glance
- Program details not reported to CRDC
- Academic signals not yet ingested for this school
Composed from federal CRDC offerings, EDFacts ACGR, and other public data. Full breakdowns below.
How Kipp King Collegiate High Sch compares for families
Top-tier college outcomes for California families.
- ▸ Statewide57.6% UC Reach — 39.5 points above the California median of 18.1%. Ahead of 93% of California high schools.
- ▸ Locally🎓 Top 9 in Alameda County on UC Reach — plus 1 more top-rank.
- ▸ vs Similar SchoolsBeats the peer median (57.6% UC Reach vs 26.6% median) across the 5 most similar nearby schools.
Kipp King Collegiate High Sch sent 399 applications to the six most selective University of California campuses and 22.8% were admitted, producing a UC Reach of 57.6% — 39.5 percentage points above the California median of 18.1%, higher than 93% of California high schools. The school produces 8.9 UCLA + UC Berkeley admits per 100 seniors.
+31.0 pp above peer median (26.6%) · Ranked #1 of 7 similar schools
18.1%
26.6%
51.2%
57.6%
Higher than 93% of California high schools (978 ranked, ≥50 seniors)
Kipp King Collegiate High Sch's UC Reach of 57.6% clears the statewide top-10% cutoff (51.2%) — meaning roughly 57 top-6 UC admits per 100 seniors, well above what most California schools achieve.
Against similar schools, Kipp King Collegiate High Sch stands out clearly — the peer-group median is 26.6%.
For context, the elite tier (top 1%) clears 97.3% — a gap of 40 pp from where this school sits.
Overall, Kipp King Collegiate High Sch's UC Reach is higher than 93% of California high schools (978 ranked).
UC funnel — which kids are getting in at what GPA
Combining the school's applicant pool GPA, admit pool GPA, actual admit rate, and statewide CA admit rates by individual GPA band, we can read which GPA tiers tend to get in — and which don't.
| Campus | 4.00+ GPA | 3.70–3.99 GPA | 3.30–3.69 GPA | < 3.30 GPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UC Berkeley | Real shot | Long odds | Filtered out | Filtered out |
| UCLA | Real shot | Long odds | Filtered out | Filtered out |
| UC San Diego | Strong shot | Moderate | Long odds | Filtered out |
| UC Santa Barbara | Strong shot | Real shot | Long odds | Filtered out |
| UC Irvine | Strong shot | Real shot | Long odds | Filtered out |
| UC Davis | Strong shot | Strong shot | Real shot | Filtered out |
The numbers behind it
| Campus | Applicant GPA | Admit GPA | Lift ⓘ | Admit rate | vs peer schools @ same GPA ⓘ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UC Berkeley | 3.96 | 4.24 | +0.28 | 9.4% | Peers +0.25 · matches |
| UCLA | 4.03 | 4.23 | +0.20 | 9.0% | Peers +0.25 · wider |
| UC San Diego | 3.95 | 4.27 | +0.32 | 27.9% | Peers +0.29 · matches |
| UC Santa Barbara | 3.91 | 4.27 | +0.36 | 28.6% | Peers +0.31 · steeper |
| UC Irvine | 3.99 | 4.22 | +0.23 | 15.5% | Peers +0.22 · matches |
| UC Davis | 3.94 | 4.19 | +0.25 | 50.7% | Peers +0.23 · matches |
📊 Statewide CA admit rates by individual GPA band, 2025 (for reference)
| GPA band | UCB | UCLA | UCSD | UCSB | UCI | UCD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4.00+ | 17.0% | 15.1% | 45.2% | 62.3% | 46.3% | 65.9% |
| 3.70–3.99 | 3.1% | 1.6% | 9.3% | 17.6% | 17.0% | 31.1% |
| 3.30–3.69 | 0.8% | 0.5% | 1.5% | 2.8% | 2.4% | 10.3% |
| 3.00–3.29 | 0.4% | 0.3% | 0.2% | 0.4% | 0.3% | 1.9% |
| < 3.00 | 0.7% | 0.4% | 0.3% | 0.2% | 0.1% | 0.7% |
Where Kipp King Collegiate High Sch sits vs. all California schools ⓘ
Overall, this school admits its UC applicants in line with what their GPAs predict (22.8% actual vs. 21.0% expected).
UC Outcomes Trend — 2018–2025
Class size from CDE grade 12 enrollment. Campus-level data — applicant/admit totals may count a student at multiple campuses more than once.
Campus Breakdown — 2025
| Campus | Applicants | Admits | Enrollees | Admit Rate | UC Reach | Yield | Avg GPA (App) | Avg GPA (Adm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UC Berkeley → Elite | 85 | 8 | 7 | 9.4% | 5.1% | 87.5% | 3.96 | 4.24 |
| UCLA → Elite | 67 | 6 | —† | 9.0% | 3.8% | — | 4.03 | 4.23 |
| UC San Diego → Selective | 61 | 17 | 6 | 27.9% | 10.8% | 35.3% | 3.95 | 4.27 |
| UC Santa Barbara → Selective | 42 | 12 | —† | 28.6% | 7.6% | — | 3.91 | 4.27 |
| UC Irvine → Selective | 71 | 11 | —† | 15.5% | 7.0% | — | 3.99 | 4.22 |
| UC Davis → | 73 | 37 | 10 | 50.7% | 23.4% | 27.0% | 3.94 | 4.19 |
SBAC academic outcomes — grade 11, 2025
Share of grade-11 students meeting or exceeding the California standard on Smarter Balanced ELA and Math. This is the academic-readiness signal that pairs with UC Reach (post-grad outcomes), stability (retention), and absenteeism (engagement). Note: statewide median Math is only ~20% — a school at 20% isn't an outlier; one at 45%+ genuinely is.
Source: California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) Smarter Balanced research files. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥30 tested students.
Student composition — 2025-26
HS grades 9–12 racial/ethnic composition and program subgroups, from CDE Census Day Enrollment. Two-year shift shown when ≥1 pt — surfaces how the community served has changed since 2023-24.
Race / ethnicity
Program subgroups
Source: California Department of Education, Census Day Enrollment 2025-26 (HS grades 9–12). Δ shown when shift is ≥1 pt since 2023-24. Categories below 0.5% omitted.
Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25
Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: grades 9–12.
Absenteeism is up 11.0 pp since 2016-17. A rising absenteeism trend often precedes formal departure — worth investigating which subgroups are driving it.
Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).
Enrollment trend & projection
If this trend holds (+1.0%/yr, Total enrollment)
At per-pupil funding of $ / student:
| Horizon | Projected Total enrollment | Change | Funding impact / yr |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 yr (2027) | ~678 | +7 | $0 |
| 3 yr (2029) | ~692 | +21 | $0 |
| 5 yr (2031) | ~706 | +35 | $0 |
Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.
Kipp King Collegiate High Sch — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot
Public · San Lorenzo · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools
- ▸On UC Reach, Kipp King Collegiate High Sch sits near the top of its similar-school group (ranked #1 of 7): 58% vs. a peer median of 27%.
- ▸Kipp King Collegiate High Sch's UC Reach has declined meaningfully from a peak of 74% in 2024 to 58% in 2025 — a 16-point drop that warrants attention. Multi-year UC Reach declines of this size often signal something specific (leadership change, comp-program shift, demographic move) rather than year-to-year noise. This is the kind of trajectory an Enrollment Trend Audit unpacks.
- ▸Senior-class enrollment is up 40% (114→160 from 2018 to 2026), outpacing the peer-group median of +18%.
- ▸Enrollment has been growing (+1.0%/yr); projects to ~692 by 2029.
Enrollment projection
Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools
| School | Type | Size | UC Reach | Enroll. trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kipp King Collegiate High Sch | Public | 671 | 57.6% | +40% |
| Peer-group median | 26.6% | +18% | ||
| Impact Academy Of Arts & Technology | Public | 688 | — | -35% |
| Madison Park Academy 6-12 | Public | 620 | — | +20% |
| Castlemont High School | Public | 694 | 5.8% | +12% |
| Lodestar: A Lighthouse Community Charter Public | Public | 756 | — | +15% |
| Hayward Twin Oaks Montessori | Public | 583 | 7.3% | +56% |
| San Lorenzo High School | Public | 963 | 10.9% | -15% |
| East Bay Innovation Academy | Public | 481 | 42.3% | +72% |
| Piedmont High School | Public | 713 | 53.7% | -5% |
| Coliseum College Prep Academy | Public | 929 | 46.5% | +75% |
| Connecting Waters Charter - East Bay | Public | 518 | — | +244% |
UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →
Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25
Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the Alameda County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.
Kipp King Collegiate High Sch outperformed Alameda County on enrollment (school +40.4% vs. county +0.6%) AND maintains 94.2% stability. Replicable model — worth documenting what's working.
40 of 685 students who enrolled at Kipp King Collegiate High Sch this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (5.8% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.
Stability by student group
Nearest peer high schools
Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.