No UC admissions data on file for El Camino Real Continuation High.

This school doesn't appear in UCOP's source-school records (it may send few or no applicants to UC). Its enrollment trend and similar-school comparison are still below.

Enrollment trend & projection

Total enrollment (9–12)
148 (2018)129 (2026)
-12.8%
Grade 12 (graduating class)
94 (2018)84 (2026)
-10.6%

If this trend holds (-1.7%/yr, Total enrollment)

At per-pupil funding of $ / student:

Horizon Projected Total enrollment Change Funding impact / yr
1 yr (2027) ~127 -2 $0
3 yr (2029) ~123 -6 $0
5 yr (2031) ~118 -11 $0

Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.

Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25

Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the Orange County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.

Critical
Bleeding from both ends.

Enrollment down 10.6% vs. county -7.1%, AND stability (29.9%) below the county median. Fewer families are choosing the school, and the ones who do aren't staying through year-end. Chronic absenteeism is also at 84.3% (up +5.3 pts from 2016-17) — engagement and demand are both signaling decline.

-10.6%  school enrollment (2018–2026)
-7.1%  Orange County baseline
-3.5pp  gap vs. county
29.9%  retention (county median 91.8%)
Enrollment — indexed to 100 at 2018
Stability rate by year (raw %)
Stability rate
29.9%
69 of 231 students

162 of 231 students who enrolled at El Camino Real Continuation High this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (70.1% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.

Orange County median
91.8% · school is in the 6th percentile of 94 HS
Statewide median
87.2% · in the 6th percentile of 1,688 HS

Stability by student group

Socio. disadvantaged (196) 31.1%
Hispanic / Latino (176) 30.1%
English learners (67) 29.9%
Students w/ disabilities (49) 30.6%
White (29) 34.5%

Nearest peer high schools

Richland Continuation High 32.0% Hillview High (continuation) 50.5% La Sierra High (alternative) 43.1% College And Career Preparatory Academy 20.4% Orange County Workforce Innovation High 56.2%

Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.

Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25

Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: grades 9–12.

Chronic absent
84.3%
177 of 210 students

Absenteeism is up 5.3 pp since 2016-17. A rising absenteeism trend often precedes formal departure — worth investigating which subgroups are driving it.

Orange County median
17.9% · school is worse than 98% of 94 HS
Statewide median
22.9%
Chronic absenteeism by year (raw %)

Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).

SBAC academic outcomes — grade 11, 2025

Share of grade-11 students meeting or exceeding the California standard on Smarter Balanced ELA and Math. This is the academic-readiness signal that pairs with UC Reach (post-grad outcomes), stability (retention), and absenteeism (engagement). Note: statewide median Math is only ~20% — a school at 20% isn't an outlier; one at 45%+ genuinely is.

ELA — met or exceeded
n = 59
11.9%
incl. 3.4% exceeded
-51.8 pts vs. Orange County median (63.7%) · CA median 54.3% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 79.3%
Math — met or exceeded
n = 59
5.1%
incl. 1.7% exceeded
-32.0 pts vs. Orange County median (37.1%) · CA median 21.1% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 53.6%

Source: California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) Smarter Balanced research files. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥30 tested students.

Student composition — 2025-26

HS grades 9–12 racial/ethnic composition and program subgroups, from CDE Census Day Enrollment. Two-year shift shown when ≥1 pt — surfaces how the community served has changed since 2023-24.

Race / ethnicity

Hispanic / Latino 81% -2.6
White 12% +1.6
Asian 2%
Black / African Am. 2% -1.1
Two or more 2%
Filipino 1%
Pacific Islander 1%

Program subgroups

Students w/ disabilities 79% -2.9
Homeless 33% +4.6
English learners 33% -2.1
Socioeconomically disadv. 19% +8.7

Source: California Department of Education, Census Day Enrollment 2025-26 (HS grades 9–12). Δ shown when shift is ≥1 pt since 2023-24. Categories below 0.5% omitted.

District financial profile — Placentia-Yorba Linda Unified (FY2020)

From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.

Total revenue
$384.5M
+15.0% since FY2017
Per-pupil revenue
$15,824
24,296 students enrolled
Revenue mix
State: 40.4%
Local: 49.2%
Federal: 10.4%
Instruction share
61.4%
of current spending · $7,917/pupil
Long-term debt
$380.8M
+0.1% since FY2017
Total revenue by year ($M)
Total expenditure by year ($M)

Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the Placentia-Yorba Linda Unified as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).

El Camino Real Continuation High — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot

Public · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools

  • Senior-class enrollment is down 11% (94→84 from 2018 to 2026), tracking the peer-group median of -12%.
  • At its recent rate (-1.7%/yr), enrollment projects to ~123 by 2029 — about 6 fewer students than today.

Enrollment projection

129 students (2026)
~123 projected (2029)
at -1.7%/yr

That's about 6 fewer students. At per-student funding of $ per student, that's roughly $0 in annual state funding at risk.

Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423 per ADA) — adjust to your district's actual per-pupil figure. Projection extrapolates the recent annual rate — not a forecast of intent.

Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools

School Type Size UC Reach Enroll. trend
El Camino Real Continuation High Public 129 -11%
Peer-group median -12%
Richland Continuation High Public 143 -45%
Hillview High (continuation) Public 137 -8%
La Sierra High (alternative) Public 230 +49%
College And Career Preparatory Academy Public 170 -18%
Orange County Workforce Innovation High Public 227 +12%
Santana High (continuation) Public 79 -51%
Marie L. Hare High Public 222 +4%
El Camino High (continuation) Public 234 +47%
Unity Middle College High Public 57 -42%
La Vista High (continuation) Public 335 -16%

UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →

Is your school winning the families it should?

An Enrollment Trend Audit benchmarks your enrollment against nearby schools, shows who's gaining and losing families, and lays out a plan to make families choose you — built around the outcomes your families value. Built for principals, heads of school, and district leaders.

Request an Enrollment Trend Audit →