Santana High (continuation)

· Los Angeles County · Rowland Unified
Public Los Angeles County 🏛 Rowland Unified → CDS 1973452…
📄 Shareable scorecard →

Compare with peers

Most similar nearby schools

Valley Alternative High (continuation) → Whitcomb Continuation High → Coronado High (continuation) → Fairvalley High (continuation) → Ron Hockwalt Academies (continuation) → Compare all similar →

No UC admissions data on file for Santana High (continuation).

This school doesn't appear in UCOP's source-school records (it may send few or no applicants to UC). Its enrollment trend and similar-school comparison are still below.

Enrollment trend & projection

Total enrollment (9–12)
174 (2018)79 (2026)
-54.6%
Grade 12 (graduating class)
114 (2018)56 (2026)
-50.9%

If this trend holds (-9.4%/yr, Total enrollment)

At per-pupil funding of $ / student:

Horizon Projected Total enrollment Change Funding impact / yr
1 yr (2027) ~72 -7 $0
3 yr (2029) ~59 -20 $0
5 yr (2031) ~48 -31 $0

Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.

Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25

Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the Los Angeles County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.

Critical
Compounding decline on both vectors.

Enrollment -50.9% vs. county -8.2% AND stability (26.1%) below the county median. Recruitment and retention both under pressure — likely a foundational rather than tactical problem. Chronic absenteeism is also at 71.9% (up +14.5 pts from 2016-17) — engagement and demand are both signaling decline.

-50.9%  school enrollment (2018–2026)
-8.2%  Los Angeles County baseline
-42.7pp  gap vs. county
26.1%  retention (county median 87.3%)
Enrollment — indexed to 100 at 2018
Stability rate by year (raw %)
Stability rate
26.1%
41 of 157 students

116 of 157 students who enrolled at Santana High (continuation) this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (73.9% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.

Los Angeles County median
87.3% · school is in the 7th percentile of 387 HS
Statewide median
87.2% · in the 4th percentile of 1,688 HS

Stability by student group

Socio. disadvantaged (150) 27.3%
Hispanic / Latino (144) 27.8%
English learners (40) 20.0%

Nearest peer high schools

Valley Alternative High (continuation) 25.8% Whitcomb Continuation High 57.3% Coronado High (continuation) 56.2% Fairvalley High (continuation) 52.2% Ron Hockwalt Academies (continuation) 49.1%

Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.

Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25

Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: grades 9–12.

Chronic absent
71.9%
100 of 139 students

Absenteeism is up 14.5 pp since 2016-17. A rising absenteeism trend often precedes formal departure — worth investigating which subgroups are driving it.

Los Angeles County median
25.2% · school is worse than 90% of 381 HS
Statewide median
22.9%
Chronic absenteeism by year (raw %)

Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).

SBAC academic outcomes — grade 11, 2025

Share of grade-11 students meeting or exceeding the California standard on Smarter Balanced ELA and Math. This is the academic-readiness signal that pairs with UC Reach (post-grad outcomes), stability (retention), and absenteeism (engagement). Note: statewide median Math is only ~20% — a school at 20% isn't an outlier; one at 45%+ genuinely is.

ELA — met or exceeded
n = 56
23.2%
incl. 1.8% exceeded
-34.8 pts vs. Los Angeles County median (58.0%) · CA median 54.3% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 79.3%
Math — met or exceeded
n = 55
3.6%
incl. 0.0% exceeded
-21.4 pts vs. Los Angeles County median (25.0%) · CA median 21.1% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 53.6%

Source: California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) Smarter Balanced research files. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥30 tested students.

Student composition — 2025-26

HS grades 9–12 racial/ethnic composition and program subgroups, from CDE Census Day Enrollment. Two-year shift shown when ≥1 pt — surfaces how the community served has changed since 2023-24.

Race / ethnicity

Hispanic / Latino 95% +2.7
Black / African Am. 2% -2.4
Asian 1%
Not reported 1%

Program subgroups

Students w/ disabilities 98% +4.3
Homeless 48% +19.9
English learners 15% -3.2

Source: California Department of Education, Census Day Enrollment 2025-26 (HS grades 9–12). Δ shown when shift is ≥1 pt since 2023-24. Categories below 0.5% omitted.

District financial profile — Rowland Unified (FY2020)

From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.

Total revenue
$239.8M
+11.5% since FY2017
Per-pupil revenue
$18,818
12,741 students enrolled
Revenue mix
State: 62.4%
Local: 22.2%
Federal: 15.4%
Instruction share
61.0%
of current spending · $9,785/pupil
Long-term debt
$225.2M
-18.3% since FY2017
Total revenue by year ($M)
Total expenditure by year ($M)

Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the Rowland Unified as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).

Santana High (continuation) — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot

Public · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools

  • Senior-class enrollment is down 51% (114→56 from 2018 to 2026), trailing the peer-group median of -26%.
  • At its recent rate (-9.4%/yr), enrollment projects to ~59 by 2029 — about 20 fewer students than today.

Enrollment projection

79 students (2026)
~59 projected (2029)
at -9.4%/yr

That's about 20 fewer students. At per-student funding of $ per student, that's roughly $0 in annual state funding at risk.

Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423 per ADA) — adjust to your district's actual per-pupil figure. Projection extrapolates the recent annual rate — not a forecast of intent.

Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools

School Type Size UC Reach Enroll. trend
Santana High (continuation) Public 79 -51%
Peer-group median -26%
Valley Alternative High (continuation) Public 75 -29%
Whitcomb Continuation High Public 85 +60%
Coronado High (continuation) Public 111 -29%
Fairvalley High (continuation) Public 101 -18%
Ron Hockwalt Academies (continuation) Public 44 +236%
Chaparral High (continuation) Public 58 -24%
Sierra High Public 122 -39%
Mt. Olive Innovation And Technology High Public 55 -56%
Nueva Vista Continuation High Public 45 +18%
Arrow High (continuation) Public 49 -36%

UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →

Is your school winning the families it should?

An Enrollment Trend Audit benchmarks your enrollment against nearby schools, shows who's gaining and losing families, and lays out a plan to make families choose you — built around the outcomes your families value. Built for principals, heads of school, and district leaders.

Request an Enrollment Trend Audit →