Victory High

· Placer County · Rocklin Unified
Public Placer County 🏛 Rocklin Unified → CDS 3175085…
📄 Shareable scorecard →

Compare with peers

Most similar nearby schools

John Adams Academy → Folsom Lake High → Pacific Career And Technology High → Mcclellan High (continuation) → Phoenix High (continuation) → Compare all similar →

No UC admissions data on file for Victory High.

This school doesn't appear in UCOP's source-school records (it may send few or no applicants to UC). Its enrollment trend and similar-school comparison are still below.

Enrollment trend & projection

Total enrollment (9–12)
76 (2018)43 (2026)
-43.4%
Grade 12 (graduating class)
53 (2018)28 (2026)
-47.2%

If this trend holds (-6.9%/yr, Total enrollment)

At per-pupil funding of $ / student:

Horizon Projected Total enrollment Change Funding impact / yr
1 yr (2027) ~40 -3 $0
3 yr (2029) ~35 -8 $0
5 yr (2031) ~30 -13 $0

Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.

Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25

Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the Placer County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.

Critical
Compounding decline on both vectors.

Enrollment -47.2% vs. county +16.4% AND stability (35.6%) below the county median. Recruitment and retention both under pressure — likely a foundational rather than tactical problem. Chronic absenteeism is also at 56.6% (up -13.6 pts from 2016-17) — engagement and demand are both signaling decline.

-47.2%  school enrollment (2018–2026)
+16.4%  Placer County baseline
-63.6pp  gap vs. county
35.6%  retention (county median 90.8%)
Enrollment — indexed to 100 at 2018
Stability rate by year (raw %)
Stability rate
35.6%
37 of 104 students

67 of 104 students who enrolled at Victory High this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (64.4% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.

Placer County median
90.8% · school is in the 4th percentile of 23 HS
Statewide median
87.2% · in the 10th percentile of 1,688 HS

Stability by student group

White (60) 31.7%
Socio. disadvantaged (51) 47.1%
Hispanic / Latino (23) 39.1%

Nearest peer high schools

Folsom Lake High 54.5% Pacific Career And Technology High 41.3% Mcclellan High (continuation) 31.9% Phoenix High (continuation) 63.9%

Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.

Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25

Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: grades 9–12.

Chronic absent
56.6%
56 of 99 students

Absenteeism is down 13.6 pp since 2016-17. Engagement improving — a positive trajectory worth understanding and reinforcing.

Placer County median
15.1% · school is worse than 86% of 22 HS
Statewide median
22.9%
Chronic absenteeism by year (raw %)

Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).

SBAC academic outcomes — grade 11, 2025

Share of grade-11 students meeting or exceeding the California standard on Smarter Balanced ELA and Math. This is the academic-readiness signal that pairs with UC Reach (post-grad outcomes), stability (retention), and absenteeism (engagement). Note: statewide median Math is only ~20% — a school at 20% isn't an outlier; one at 45%+ genuinely is.

ELA — met or exceeded
n = 17
29.4%
incl. 0.0% exceeded
-37.9 pts vs. Placer County median (67.3%) · CA median 54.3% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 79.3%
Math — met or exceeded
n = 17
5.9%
incl. 0.0% exceeded
-34.3 pts vs. Placer County median (40.2%) · CA median 21.1% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 53.6%

Source: California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) Smarter Balanced research files. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥30 tested students.

Student composition — 2025-26

HS grades 9–12 racial/ethnic composition and program subgroups, from CDE Census Day Enrollment. Two-year shift shown when ≥1 pt — surfaces how the community served has changed since 2023-24.

Race / ethnicity

White 58% -1.9
Hispanic / Latino 28% +7.9
Two or more 5% -2.4
American Indian 5%
Asian 2% -1.2
Not reported 2% -3.6

Program subgroups

Students w/ disabilities 37% -1.6

Source: California Department of Education, Census Day Enrollment 2025-26 (HS grades 9–12). Δ shown when shift is ≥1 pt since 2023-24. Categories below 0.5% omitted.

District financial profile — Rocklin Unified (FY2020)

From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.

Total revenue
$179.8M
+11.9% since FY2017
Per-pupil revenue
$15,764
11,405 students enrolled
Revenue mix
State: 45.7%
Local: 47.7%
Federal: 6.6%
Instruction share
62.5%
of current spending · $7,968/pupil
Long-term debt
$138.9M
-12.4% since FY2017
Total revenue by year ($M)
Total expenditure by year ($M)

Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the Rocklin Unified as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).

Victory High — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot

Public · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools

  • Senior-class enrollment is down 47% (53→28 from 2018 to 2026), trailing the peer-group median of +7%.
  • At its recent rate (-6.9%/yr), enrollment projects to ~35 by 2029 — about 8 fewer students than today.

Enrollment projection

43 students (2026)
~35 projected (2029)
at -6.9%/yr

That's about 8 fewer students. At per-student funding of $ per student, that's roughly $0 in annual state funding at risk.

Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423 per ADA) — adjust to your district's actual per-pupil figure. Projection extrapolates the recent annual rate — not a forecast of intent.

Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools

School Type Size UC Reach Enroll. trend
Victory High Public 43 -47%
Peer-group median +7%
John Adams Academy Public 26 +0%
Folsom Lake High Public 36 -3%
Pacific Career And Technology High Public 73 -41%
Mcclellan High (continuation) Public 78 +6%
Phoenix High (continuation) Public 95 +21%
Confluence Continuation High Public 75 +104%
Atlas Learning Academy Public 99 +100%
La Entrada Continuation High Public 84 +43%
Meraki High Public 84 +6%
Adelante High (continuation) Public 118 +8%

UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →

Is your school winning the families it should?

An Enrollment Trend Audit benchmarks your enrollment against nearby schools, shows who's gaining and losing families, and lays out a plan to make families choose you — built around the outcomes your families value. Built for principals, heads of school, and district leaders.

Request an Enrollment Trend Audit →