Folsom Lake High

· Sacramento County · Folsom-Cordova Unified
Public Sacramento County 🏛 Folsom-Cordova Unified → CDS 3467330…
📄 Shareable scorecard →

Compare with peers

Most similar nearby schools

John Adams Academy → Victory High → El Centro Jr./Sr. High → Meraki High → Pacific Career And Technology High → Compare all similar →

No UC admissions data on file for Folsom Lake High.

This school doesn't appear in UCOP's source-school records (it may send few or no applicants to UC). Its enrollment trend and similar-school comparison are still below.

Enrollment trend & projection

Total enrollment (9–12)
90 (2018)36 (2026)
-60.0%
Grade 12 (graduating class)
37 (2018)36 (2026)
-2.7%

If this trend holds (-10.8%/yr, Total enrollment)

At per-pupil funding of $ / student:

Horizon Projected Total enrollment Change Funding impact / yr
1 yr (2027) ~32 -4 $0
3 yr (2029) ~26 -10 $0
5 yr (2031) ~20 -16 $0

Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.

Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25

Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the Sacramento County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.

Critical
Bleeding from both ends.

Enrollment down 2.7% vs. county +3.0%, AND stability (54.5%) below the county median. Fewer families are choosing the school, and the ones who do aren't staying through year-end. Chronic absenteeism is also at 73.3% (up +20.4 pts from 2016-17) — engagement and demand are both signaling decline.

-2.7%  school enrollment (2018–2026)
+3.0%  Sacramento County baseline
-5.7pp  gap vs. county
54.5%  retention (county median 80.8%)
Enrollment — indexed to 100 at 2018
Stability rate by year (raw %)
Stability rate
54.5%
36 of 66 students

30 of 66 students who enrolled at Folsom Lake High this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (45.5% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.

Sacramento County median
80.8% · school is in the 30th percentile of 77 HS
Statewide median
87.2% · in the 19th percentile of 1,688 HS

Stability by student group

Socio. disadvantaged (41) 56.1%
Students w/ disabilities (31) 61.3%
Hispanic / Latino (25) 60.0%
White (24) 54.2%

Nearest peer high schools

Victory High 35.6% El Centro Jr./Sr. High 1.8% Meraki High 80.8% Pacific Career And Technology High 41.3%

Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.

Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25

Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: grades 9–12.

Chronic absent
73.3%
44 of 60 students

Absenteeism is up 20.4 pp since 2016-17. A rising absenteeism trend often precedes formal departure — worth investigating which subgroups are driving it.

Sacramento County median
25.8% · school is worse than 88% of 75 HS
Statewide median
22.9%
Chronic absenteeism by year (raw %)

Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).

SBAC academic outcomes — grade 11, 2025

Share of grade-11 students meeting or exceeding the California standard on Smarter Balanced ELA and Math. This is the academic-readiness signal that pairs with UC Reach (post-grad outcomes), stability (retention), and absenteeism (engagement). Note: statewide median Math is only ~20% — a school at 20% isn't an outlier; one at 45%+ genuinely is.

ELA — met or exceeded
n = 15
6.7%
incl. 0.0% exceeded
-39.4 pts vs. Sacramento County median (46.1%) · CA median 54.3% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 79.3%
Math — met or exceeded
n = 15
0.0%
incl. 0.0% exceeded
-17.7 pts vs. Sacramento County median (17.7%) · CA median 21.1% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 53.6%

Source: California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) Smarter Balanced research files. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥30 tested students.

Student composition — 2025-26

HS grades 9–12 racial/ethnic composition and program subgroups, from CDE Census Day Enrollment. Two-year shift shown when ≥1 pt — surfaces how the community served has changed since 2023-24.

Race / ethnicity

Hispanic / Latino 42% +12.8
White 33% -7.5
Two or more 11% -2.1
Black / African Am. 8% -3.5
Asian 6% +4.3

Program subgroups

Students w/ disabilities 72% +27.5
Socioeconomically disadv. 56% +18.8

Source: California Department of Education, Census Day Enrollment 2025-26 (HS grades 9–12). Δ shown when shift is ≥1 pt since 2023-24. Categories below 0.5% omitted.

District financial profile — Folsom-Cordova Unified (FY2020)

From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.

Total revenue
$322.8M
+20.3% since FY2017
Per-pupil revenue
$16,062
20,096 students enrolled
Revenue mix
State: 51.9%
Local: 40.2%
Federal: 7.9%
Instruction share
59.9%
of current spending · $7,546/pupil
Long-term debt
$632.6M
+30.0% since FY2017
Total revenue by year ($M)
Total expenditure by year ($M)

Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the Folsom-Cordova Unified as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).

Folsom Lake High — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot

Public · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools

  • Senior-class enrollment is down 3% (37→36 from 2018 to 2026), outpacing the peer-group median of -14%.
  • At its recent rate (-10.8%/yr), enrollment projects to ~26 by 2029 — about 10 fewer students than today.

Enrollment projection

36 students (2026)
~26 projected (2029)
at -10.8%/yr

That's about 10 fewer students. At per-student funding of $ per student, that's roughly $0 in annual state funding at risk.

Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423 per ADA) — adjust to your district's actual per-pupil figure. Projection extrapolates the recent annual rate — not a forecast of intent.

Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools

School Type Size UC Reach Enroll. trend
Folsom Lake High Public 36 -3%
Peer-group median -14%
John Adams Academy Public 26 +0%
Victory High Public 43 -47%
El Centro Jr./Sr. High Public 52 -55%
Meraki High Public 84 +6%
Pacific Career And Technology High Public 73 -41%
La Entrada Continuation High Public 84 +43%
Kinney High (continuation) Public 98 -36%
Mcclellan High (continuation) Public 78 +6%
Adelante High (continuation) Public 118 +8%
Vista Nueva Career And Technology High Public 102 -29%

UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →

Is your school winning the families it should?

An Enrollment Trend Audit benchmarks your enrollment against nearby schools, shows who's gaining and losing families, and lays out a plan to make families choose you — built around the outcomes your families value. Built for principals, heads of school, and district leaders.

Request an Enrollment Trend Audit →