Ridgeview High (continuation)

· Butte County · Paradise Unified
Public Butte County 🏛 Paradise Unified → CDS 0461531…
📄 Shareable scorecard →

Compare with peers

Most similar nearby schools

Ipakanni Early College Charter → Hometech Charter → Hearthstone School → Prospect High (continuation) → Fair View High (continuation) → Compare all similar →

No UC admissions data on file for Ridgeview High (continuation).

This school doesn't appear in UCOP's source-school records (it may send few or no applicants to UC). Its enrollment trend and similar-school comparison are still below.

Enrollment trend & projection

Total enrollment (9–12)
95 (2018)56 (2026)
-41.1%
Grade 12 (graduating class)
43 (2018)27 (2026)
-37.2%

If this trend holds (-6.4%/yr, Total enrollment)

At per-pupil funding of $ / student:

Horizon Projected Total enrollment Change Funding impact / yr
1 yr (2027) ~52 -4 $0
3 yr (2029) ~46 -10 $0
5 yr (2031) ~40 -16 $0

Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.

Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25

Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the Butte County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.

Critical
Compounding decline on both vectors.

Enrollment -37.2% vs. county +19.8% AND stability (29.5%) below the county median. Recruitment and retention both under pressure — likely a foundational rather than tactical problem. Chronic absenteeism is also at 65.9% (up -20.3 pts from 2016-17) — engagement and demand are both signaling decline.

-37.2%  school enrollment (2018–2026)
+19.8%  Butte County baseline
-57.0pp  gap vs. county
29.5%  retention (county median 81.8%)
Enrollment — indexed to 100 at 2018
Stability rate by year (raw %)
Stability rate
29.5%
28 of 95 students

67 of 95 students who enrolled at Ridgeview High (continuation) this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (70.5% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.

Butte County median
81.8% · school is in the 8th percentile of 13 HS
Statewide median
87.2% · in the 6th percentile of 1,688 HS

Stability by student group

Socio. disadvantaged (87) 31.0%
White (74) 31.1%
Students w/ disabilities (20) 35.0%

Nearest peer high schools

Ipakanni Early College Charter 50.0% Hometech Charter 55.5% Hearthstone School 67.0% Prospect High (continuation) 28.0% Fair View High (continuation) 30.3%

Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.

Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25

Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: grades 9–12.

Chronic absent
65.9%
58 of 88 students

Absenteeism is down 20.3 pp since 2016-17. Engagement improving — a positive trajectory worth understanding and reinforcing.

Butte County median
25.9% · school is worse than 85% of 13 HS
Statewide median
22.9%
Chronic absenteeism by year (raw %)

Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).

SBAC academic outcomes — grade 11, 2025

Share of grade-11 students meeting or exceeding the California standard on Smarter Balanced ELA and Math. This is the academic-readiness signal that pairs with UC Reach (post-grad outcomes), stability (retention), and absenteeism (engagement). Note: statewide median Math is only ~20% — a school at 20% isn't an outlier; one at 45%+ genuinely is.

ELA — met or exceeded
n = 18
16.7%
incl. 11.1% exceeded
-33.3 pts vs. Butte County median (50.0%) · CA median 54.3% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 79.3%
Math — met or exceeded
n = 18
0.0%
incl. 0.0% exceeded
-28.0 pts vs. Butte County median (28.0%) · CA median 21.1% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 53.6%

Source: California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) Smarter Balanced research files. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥30 tested students.

Student composition — 2025-26

HS grades 9–12 racial/ethnic composition and program subgroups, from CDE Census Day Enrollment. Two-year shift shown when ≥1 pt — surfaces how the community served has changed since 2023-24.

Race / ethnicity

White 80% +8.7
Hispanic / Latino 11% -2.5
Two or more 7%
Black / African Am. 2%

Program subgroups

Students w/ disabilities 82% +21.7

Source: California Department of Education, Census Day Enrollment 2025-26 (HS grades 9–12). Δ shown when shift is ≥1 pt since 2023-24. Categories below 0.5% omitted.

District financial profile — Paradise Unified (FY2020)

From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.

Total revenue
$52.2M
+12.0% since FY2017
Per-pupil revenue
$34,081
1,533 students enrolled
Revenue mix
State: 68.1%
Local: 15.7%
Federal: 16.3%
Instruction share
59.8%
of current spending · $12,235/pupil
Long-term debt
$10.0M
+1932.5% since FY2017
Total revenue by year ($M)
Total expenditure by year ($M)

Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the Paradise Unified as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).

Ridgeview High (continuation) — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot

Public · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools

  • Senior-class enrollment is down 37% (43→27 from 2018 to 2026), trailing the peer-group median of +23%.
  • At its recent rate (-6.4%/yr), enrollment projects to ~46 by 2029 — about 10 fewer students than today.

Enrollment projection

56 students (2026)
~46 projected (2029)
at -6.4%/yr

That's about 10 fewer students. At per-student funding of $ per student, that's roughly $0 in annual state funding at risk.

Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423 per ADA) — adjust to your district's actual per-pupil figure. Projection extrapolates the recent annual rate — not a forecast of intent.

Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools

School Type Size UC Reach Enroll. trend
Ridgeview High (continuation) Public 56 -37%
Peer-group median +23%
Ipakanni Early College Charter Public 66 +50%
Hometech Charter Public 145 +41%
Hearthstone School Public 79 +18%
Prospect High (continuation) Public 81 -27%
Fair View High (continuation) Public 100 -20%
Academy For Change Public 25 +300%
Princeton High Public 44 -35%
Centennial Continuation High Public 35 +29%
North Valley High (continuation) Public 30 +70%
Vantage Point Charter Public 37 -36%

UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →

Is your school winning the families it should?

An Enrollment Trend Audit benchmarks your enrollment against nearby schools, shows who's gaining and losing families, and lays out a plan to make families choose you — built around the outcomes your families value. Built for principals, heads of school, and district leaders.

Request an Enrollment Trend Audit →