Envision Academy For Arts & Technology

Public Alameda County 🏛 Alameda County Office of Education → CDS 0110017…
📄 Shareable scorecard →

Compare with peers

Most similar nearby schools

Metwest High School → Emery Secondary School → Dewey High School → Kipp San Francisco College Preparatory → Downtown High → Compare all similar →

No UC admissions data on file for Envision Academy For Arts & Technology.

This school doesn't appear in UCOP's source-school records (it may send few or no applicants to UC). Its enrollment trend and similar-school comparison are still below.

Enrollment trend & projection

Total enrollment (9–12)
413 (2018)171 (2026)
-58.6%
Grade 12 (graduating class)
93 (2018)39 (2026)
-58.1%

If this trend holds (-10.4%/yr, Total enrollment)

At per-pupil funding of $ / student:

Horizon Projected Total enrollment Change Funding impact / yr
1 yr (2027) ~153 -18 $0
3 yr (2029) ~123 -48 $0
5 yr (2031) ~99 -72 $0

Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.

Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25

Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the Alameda County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.

Critical
Compounding decline on both vectors.

Enrollment -58.1% vs. county +0.6% AND stability (72.8%) below the county median. Recruitment and retention both under pressure — likely a foundational rather than tactical problem. Chronic absenteeism is also at 60.5% (up +36.6 pts from 2016-17) — engagement and demand are both signaling decline.

-58.1%  school enrollment (2018–2026)
+0.6%  Alameda County baseline
-58.7pp  gap vs. county
72.8%  retention (county median 89.9%)
Enrollment — indexed to 100 at 2018
Stability rate by year (raw %)
Stability rate
72.8%
118 of 162 students

44 of 162 students who enrolled at Envision Academy For Arts & Technology this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (27.2% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.

Alameda County median
89.9% · school is in the 27th percentile of 70 HS
Statewide median
87.2% · in the 24th percentile of 1,688 HS

Stability by student group

Socio. disadvantaged (176) 76.7%
Black / African Am. (106) 67.0%
Hispanic / Latino (85) 82.4%
Students w/ disabilities (49) 71.4%
English learners (26) 76.9%

Nearest peer high schools

Emery Secondary School 86.9% Dewey High School 28.4% Kipp San Francisco College Preparatory 85.9% Downtown High 49.4%

Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.

Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25

Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: grades 9–12.

Chronic absent
58.4%
90 of 154 students

Absenteeism is up 34.5 pp since 2016-17. A rising absenteeism trend often precedes formal departure — worth investigating which subgroups are driving it.

Alameda County median
25.4% · school is worse than 78% of 69 HS
Statewide median
22.9%
Chronic absenteeism by year (raw %)

Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).

SBAC academic outcomes — grade 11, 2025

Share of grade-11 students meeting or exceeding the California standard on Smarter Balanced ELA and Math. This is the academic-readiness signal that pairs with UC Reach (post-grad outcomes), stability (retention), and absenteeism (engagement). Note: statewide median Math is only ~20% — a school at 20% isn't an outlier; one at 45%+ genuinely is.

ELA — met or exceeded
n = 32
56.2%
incl. 34.4% exceeded
On the Alameda County median (55.4%) · CA median 54.3% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 79.3%
Math — met or exceeded
n = 33
33.3%
incl. 12.1% exceeded
+9.1 pts above Alameda County median (24.2%) · CA median 21.1% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 53.6%

Source: California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) Smarter Balanced research files. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥30 tested students.

Student composition — 2025-26

HS grades 9–12 racial/ethnic composition and program subgroups, from CDE Census Day Enrollment. Two-year shift shown when ≥1 pt — surfaces how the community served has changed since 2023-24.

Race / ethnicity

Black / African Am. 47% +14.5
Hispanic / Latino 38% -14.7
White 7% +1.0
Two or more 4% +1.6
American Indian 2% +1.2
Asian 1%

Program subgroups

Students w/ disabilities 74% -4.6

Source: California Department of Education, Census Day Enrollment 2025-26 (HS grades 9–12). Δ shown when shift is ≥1 pt since 2023-24. Categories below 0.5% omitted.

District financial profile — Alameda County Office of Education (FY2020)

From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.

Total revenue
$71.1M
+17.0% since FY2017
Per-pupil revenue
$246,162
289 students enrolled
Revenue mix
State: 27.4%
Local: 67.2%
Federal: 5.4%
Instruction share
14.6%
of current spending · $23,103/pupil
Total revenue by year ($M)
Total expenditure by year ($M)

Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the Alameda County Office of Education as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).

Envision Academy For Arts & Technology — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot

Public · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools

  • Senior-class enrollment is down 58% (93→39 from 2018 to 2026), trailing the peer-group median of -11%.
  • At its recent rate (-10.4%/yr), enrollment projects to ~123 by 2029 — about 48 fewer students than today.

Enrollment projection

171 students (2026)
~123 projected (2029)
at -10.4%/yr

That's about 48 fewer students. At per-student funding of $ per student, that's roughly $0 in annual state funding at risk.

Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423 per ADA) — adjust to your district's actual per-pupil figure. Projection extrapolates the recent annual rate — not a forecast of intent.

Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools

School Type Size UC Reach Enroll. trend
Envision Academy For Arts & Technology Public 171 -58%
Peer-group median 9.6% -11%
Metwest High School Public 193 26.8% +16%
Emery Secondary School Public 148 31.1% +6%
Dewey High School Public 127 -52%
Kipp San Francisco College Preparatory Public 177 -40%
Downtown High Public 182 +352%
Oakland International High Sch Public 244 9.6% -12%
Lps Oakland R&d Campus Public 143 8.3% -36%
Gateway To College High At Laney College Public 100 -11%
Mcclymonds High School Public 301 5.4% -11%
Rudsdale Continuation High Public 245 +95%

UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →

Is your school winning the families it should?

An Enrollment Trend Audit benchmarks your enrollment against nearby schools, shows who's gaining and losing families, and lays out a plan to make families choose you — built around the outcomes your families value. Built for principals, heads of school, and district leaders.

Request an Enrollment Trend Audit →