Downtown High

· San Francisco County · San Francisco Unified
Public San Francisco County 🏛 San Francisco Unified → CDS 3868478…
📄 Shareable scorecard →

Compare with peers

Most similar nearby schools

Kipp San Francisco College Preparatory → Wells (ida B.) High → Independence High → S.f. International High → Envision Academy For Arts & Technology → Compare all similar →

No UC admissions data on file for Downtown High.

This school doesn't appear in UCOP's source-school records (it may send few or no applicants to UC). Its enrollment trend and similar-school comparison are still below.

Enrollment trend & projection

Total enrollment (9–12)
169 (2018)182 (2026)
+7.7%
Grade 12 (graduating class)
27 (2018)122 (2026)
+351.9%

If this trend holds (+0.9%/yr, Total enrollment)

At per-pupil funding of $ / student:

Horizon Projected Total enrollment Change Funding impact / yr
1 yr (2027) ~184 +2 $0
3 yr (2029) ~187 +5 $0
5 yr (2031) ~191 +9 $0

Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.

Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25

Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the San Francisco County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.

Mixed signal
Demand outpacing county is masking internal churn.

Enrollment growth is beating San Francisco County (+351.9% vs. -1.6%), but 130 of 257 students didn't maintain continuous enrollment. Why are families leaving once enrolled? Chronic absenteeism is also at 88.0% (up -9.3 pts from 2016-17) — engagement and demand are both signaling decline.

+351.9%  school enrollment (2018–2026)
-1.6%  San Francisco County baseline
+353.5pp  gap vs. county
49.4%  retention (county median 86.2%)
Enrollment — indexed to 100 at 2018
Stability rate by year (raw %)
Stability rate
49.4%
127 of 257 students

130 of 257 students who enrolled at Downtown High this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (50.6% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.

San Francisco County median
86.2% · school is in the 17th percentile of 18 HS
Statewide median
87.2% · in the 17th percentile of 1,688 HS

Stability by student group

Socio. disadvantaged (197) 49.2%
Hispanic / Latino (145) 51.0%
Students w/ disabilities (74) 36.5%
English learners (66) 50.0%
Black / African Am. (50) 34.0%

Nearest peer high schools

Kipp San Francisco College Preparatory 85.9% Wells (ida B.) High 46.0% Independence High 60.3% S.f. International High 79.1% Envision Academy For Arts & Technology 72.8%

Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.

Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25

Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: grades 9–12.

Chronic absent
88.0%
220 of 250 students

Absenteeism is down 9.3 pp since 2016-17. Engagement improving — a positive trajectory worth understanding and reinforcing.

San Francisco County median
39.8% · school is worse than 88% of 17 HS
Statewide median
22.9%
Chronic absenteeism by year (raw %)

Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).

SBAC academic outcomes — grade 11, 2025

Share of grade-11 students meeting or exceeding the California standard on Smarter Balanced ELA and Math. This is the academic-readiness signal that pairs with UC Reach (post-grad outcomes), stability (retention), and absenteeism (engagement). Note: statewide median Math is only ~20% — a school at 20% isn't an outlier; one at 45%+ genuinely is.

ELA — met or exceeded
n = 50
6.0%
incl. 0.0% exceeded
-48.5 pts vs. San Francisco County median (54.5%) · CA median 54.3% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 79.3%
Math — met or exceeded
n = 48
0.0%
incl. 0.0% exceeded
-21.2 pts vs. San Francisco County median (21.2%) · CA median 21.1% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 53.6%

Source: California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) Smarter Balanced research files. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥30 tested students.

Student composition — 2025-26

HS grades 9–12 racial/ethnic composition and program subgroups, from CDE Census Day Enrollment. Two-year shift shown when ≥1 pt — surfaces how the community served has changed since 2023-24.

Race / ethnicity

Hispanic / Latino 62% +2.2
Black / African Am. 15% -4.9
Two or more 7%
Pacific Islander 6% +1.4
Asian 3%
White 3% +1.3
Not reported 3%
Filipino 2%
American Indian 0%

Program subgroups

Students w/ disabilities 71% +7.6
English learners 29% +3.9
Socioeconomically disadv. 26% -1.5
Homeless 9%

Source: California Department of Education, Census Day Enrollment 2025-26 (HS grades 9–12). Δ shown when shift is ≥1 pt since 2023-24. Categories below 0.5% omitted.

District financial profile — San Francisco Unified (FY2020)

From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.

Total revenue
$1228.3M
+17.3% since FY2017
Per-pupil revenue
$23,716
51,790 students enrolled
Revenue mix
State: 36.3%
Local: 56.0%
Federal: 7.8%
Instruction share
53.2%
of current spending · $9,747/pupil
Long-term debt
$969.8M
+0.1% since FY2017
Total revenue by year ($M)
Total expenditure by year ($M)

Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the San Francisco Unified as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).

Downtown High — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot

Public · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools

  • Senior-class enrollment is up 352% (27→122 from 2018 to 2026), outpacing the peer-group median of -9%.
  • Enrollment has been growing (+0.9%/yr); projects to ~187 by 2029.

Enrollment projection

182 students (2026)
~187 projected (2029)
at +0.9%/yr

Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools

School Type Size UC Reach Enroll. trend
Downtown High Public 182 +352%
Peer-group median 18.2% -9%
Kipp San Francisco College Preparatory Public 177 -40%
Wells (ida B.) High Public 192 +150%
Independence High Public 204 6.7% +138%
S.f. International High Public 271 -7%
Envision Academy For Arts & Technology Public 171 -58%
Metwest High School Public 193 26.8% +16%
Emery Secondary School Public 148 31.1% +6%
Oakland International High Sch Public 244 9.6% -12%
Academy (the)- Sf @mcateer Public 98 -72%
Dewey High School Public 127 -52%

UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →

Is your school winning the families it should?

An Enrollment Trend Audit benchmarks your enrollment against nearby schools, shows who's gaining and losing families, and lays out a plan to make families choose you — built around the outcomes your families value. Built for principals, heads of school, and district leaders.

Request an Enrollment Trend Audit →