No UC admissions data on file for Empowering Possibilities International Charter.

This school doesn't appear in UCOP's source-school records (it may send few or no applicants to UC). Its enrollment trend and similar-school comparison are still below.

Enrollment trend & projection

Total enrollment
377 (2018)409 (2026)
+8.5%

If this trend holds (+1.0%/yr, Total enrollment)

At per-pupil funding of $ / student:

Horizon Projected Total enrollment Change Funding impact / yr
1 yr (2027) ~413 +4 $0
3 yr (2029) ~422 +13 $0
5 yr (2031) ~430 +21 $0

Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.

Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25

Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the Yolo County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.

Stability rate
86.2%
399 of 463 students

64 of 463 students who enrolled at Empowering Possibilities International Charter this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (13.8% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.

Yolo County median
89.5% · school is in the 28th percentile of 18 HS
Statewide median
88.7% · in the 39th percentile of 2,648 HS

Stability by student group

White (413) 86.7%
Socio. disadvantaged (356) 84.6%
English learners (347) 88.2%
Students w/ disabilities (34) 76.5%
Hispanic / Latino (24) 91.7%

Nearest peer high schools

Sacramento Valley Charter 89.0% River Charter Schools Lighthouse Charter 84.2% Sacramento Charter High 77.2% Yav Pem Suab Academy - Preparing For The Future Charter 92.1% Umoja International Academy 93.0%

Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.

Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25

Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: total enrollment.

Chronic absent
23.5%
106 of 452 students

Absenteeism is up 9.1 pp since 2016-17. A rising absenteeism trend often precedes formal departure — worth investigating which subgroups are driving it.

Yolo County median
19.6% · school is worse than 56% of 18 HS
Statewide median
20.9%
Chronic absenteeism by year (raw %)

Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).

District financial profile — Yolo County Office of Education (FY2020)

From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.

Total revenue
$47.6M
+10.0% since FY2017
Per-pupil revenue
$231,262
206 students enrolled
Revenue mix
State: 44.8%
Local: 32.2%
Federal: 23.1%
Instruction share
37.3%
of current spending · $37,985/pupil
Long-term debt
$5.2M
-8.6% since FY2017
Total revenue by year ($M)
Total expenditure by year ($M)

Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the Yolo County Office of Education as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).

Empowering Possibilities International Charter — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot

Public · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools

  • Enrollment has been growing (+1.0%/yr); projects to ~422 by 2029.

Enrollment projection

409 students (2026)
~422 projected (2029)
at +1.0%/yr

Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools

School Type Size UC Reach Enroll. trend
Empowering Possibilities International Charter Public 409
Peer-group median 7.2% -13%
Sacramento Valley Charter Public 393
River Charter Schools Lighthouse Charter Public 473
Sacramento Charter High Public 375 -45%
Yav Pem Suab Academy - Preparing For The Future Charter Public 464
Umoja International Academy Public 376 10.0% -4%
Martin Luther King Jr. Technology Academy Public 434
Sol Aureus College Preparatory Public 310
Futures High School Public 394 4.3% -13%
Capitol Collegiate Academy Public 499
Aspire Alexander Twilight College Preparatory Academy Public 441

UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →

Is your school winning the families it should?

An Enrollment Trend Audit benchmarks your enrollment against nearby schools, shows who's gaining and losing families, and lays out a plan to make families choose you — built around the outcomes your families value. Built for principals, heads of school, and district leaders.

Request an Enrollment Trend Audit →