Aspire Triumph Technology Academy

· Alameda County · Oakland Unified
Public Alameda County 🏛 Oakland Unified → CDS 0161259…
📄 Shareable scorecard →

Compare with peers

Most similar nearby schools

Lps Oakland R&d Campus → Lincoln High (continuation) → Dewey High School → Aurum Preparatory Academy → East Bay Arts → Compare all similar →

No UC admissions data on file for Aspire Triumph Technology Academy.

This school doesn't appear in UCOP's source-school records (it may send few or no applicants to UC). Its enrollment trend and similar-school comparison are still below.

Enrollment trend & projection

Total enrollment
287 (2018)123 (2026)
-57.1%

If this trend holds (-10.0%/yr, Total enrollment)

At per-pupil funding of $ / student:

Horizon Projected Total enrollment Change Funding impact / yr
1 yr (2027) ~111 -12 $0
3 yr (2029) ~90 -33 $0
5 yr (2031) ~72 -51 $0

Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.

Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25

Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the Alameda County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.

Stability rate
85.6%
202 of 236 students

34 of 236 students who enrolled at Aspire Triumph Technology Academy this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (14.4% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.

Alameda County median
89.9% · school is in the 36th percentile of 107 HS
Statewide median
88.7% · in the 37th percentile of 2,648 HS

Stability by student group

Socio. disadvantaged (224) 86.6%
Black / African Am. (117) 85.5%
Hispanic / Latino (97) 90.7%
English learners (54) 87.0%
Students w/ disabilities (48) 87.5%

Nearest peer high schools

Lincoln High (continuation) 50.7% Dewey High School 28.4% Aurum Preparatory Academy 86.2% East Bay Arts 86.7%

Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.

Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25

Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: total enrollment.

Chronic absent
42.2%
97 of 230 students

Absenteeism is up 23.3 pp since 2016-17. A rising absenteeism trend often precedes formal departure — worth investigating which subgroups are driving it.

Alameda County median
25.1% · school is worse than 75% of 106 HS
Statewide median
20.9%
Chronic absenteeism by year (raw %)

Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).

District financial profile — Oakland Unified (FY2020)

From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.

Total revenue
$889.6M
+20.9% since FY2017
Per-pupil revenue
$25,065
35,489 students enrolled
Revenue mix
State: 43.4%
Local: 41.5%
Federal: 15.1%
Instruction share
58.3%
of current spending · $11,001/pupil
Long-term debt
$998.6M
+10.3% since FY2017
Total revenue by year ($M)
Total expenditure by year ($M)

Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the Oakland Unified as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).

Aspire Triumph Technology Academy — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot

Public · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools

  • At its recent rate (-10.0%/yr), enrollment projects to ~90 by 2029 — about 33 fewer students than today.

Enrollment projection

123 students (2026)
~90 projected (2029)
at -10.0%/yr

That's about 33 fewer students. At per-student funding of $ per student, that's roughly $0 in annual state funding at risk.

Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423 per ADA) — adjust to your district's actual per-pupil figure. Projection extrapolates the recent annual rate — not a forecast of intent.

Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools

School Type Size UC Reach Enroll. trend
Aspire Triumph Technology Academy Public 123
Peer-group median 8.3% -21%
Lps Oakland R&d Campus Public 143 8.3% -36%
Lincoln High (continuation) Public 112 -31%
Dewey High School Public 127 -52%
Aurum Preparatory Academy Public 93
East Bay Arts Public 144 -2%
Alternatives in Action Hs Public 86 +440%
Gateway To College High At Laney College Public 100 -11%
Fred T. Korematsu Discovery Academy Elementary Public 183
Aspire College Academy Public 199
Oakland Academy Of Knowledge Elementary Public 210

UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →

Is your school winning the families it should?

An Enrollment Trend Audit benchmarks your enrollment against nearby schools, shows who's gaining and losing families, and lays out a plan to make families choose you — built around the outcomes your families value. Built for principals, heads of school, and district leaders.

Request an Enrollment Trend Audit →