No UC admissions data on file for Aurum Preparatory Academy.

This school doesn't appear in UCOP's source-school records (it may send few or no applicants to UC). Its enrollment trend and similar-school comparison are still below.

Enrollment trend & projection

Total enrollment
91 (2019)93 (2025)
+2.2%

If this trend holds (+0.4%/yr, Total enrollment)

At per-pupil funding of $ / student:

Horizon Projected Total enrollment Change Funding impact / yr
1 yr (2026) ~93 +0 $0
3 yr (2028) ~94 +1 $0
5 yr (2030) ~95 +2 $0

Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.

Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25

Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the Alameda County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.

Stability rate
86.2%
81 of 94 students

13 of 94 students who enrolled at Aurum Preparatory Academy this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (13.8% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.

Alameda County median
89.9% · school is in the 37th percentile of 107 HS
Statewide median
88.7% · in the 39th percentile of 2,648 HS

Stability by student group

Socio. disadvantaged (84) 86.9%
Black / African Am. (44) 84.1%
Hispanic / Latino (43) 90.7%
English learners (26) 84.6%
Students w/ disabilities (25) 80.0%

Nearest peer high schools

Alternatives in Action Hs 72.6% Gateway To College High At Laney College 62.8% Lincoln High (continuation) 50.7% Aspire Triumph Technology Academy 85.6% Millennium High Alternative 88.2%

Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.

Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25

Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: total enrollment.

Chronic absent
11.8%
11 of 93 students

Absenteeism is down 19.1 pp since 2018-19. Engagement improving — a positive trajectory worth understanding and reinforcing.

Alameda County median
25.1% · school is better than 78% of 106 HS
Statewide median
20.9%
Chronic absenteeism by year (raw %)

Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).

District financial profile — Alameda County Office of Education (FY2020)

From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.

Total revenue
$71.1M
+17.0% since FY2017
Per-pupil revenue
$246,162
289 students enrolled
Revenue mix
State: 27.4%
Local: 67.2%
Federal: 5.4%
Instruction share
14.6%
of current spending · $23,103/pupil
Total revenue by year ($M)
Total expenditure by year ($M)

Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the Alameda County Office of Education as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).

Aurum Preparatory Academy — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot

Public · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools

  • Enrollment has been growing (+0.4%/yr); projects to ~94 by 2028.

Enrollment projection

93 students (2025)
~94 projected (2028)
at +0.4%/yr

Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools

School Type Size UC Reach Enroll. trend
Aurum Preparatory Academy Public 93
Peer-group median 8.3% -21%
Alternatives in Action Hs Public 86 +440%
Gateway To College High At Laney College Public 100 -11%
Lincoln High (continuation) Public 112 -31%
Aspire Triumph Technology Academy Public 123
Millennium High Alternative Public 75 +6%
Dewey High School Public 127 -52%
Lps Oakland R&d Campus Public 143 8.3% -36%
Aims College Prep Middle Public 136
Fred T. Korematsu Discovery Academy Elementary Public 183
Aspire College Academy Public 199

UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →

Is your school winning the families it should?

An Enrollment Trend Audit benchmarks your enrollment against nearby schools, shows who's gaining and losing families, and lays out a plan to make families choose you — built around the outcomes your families value. Built for principals, heads of school, and district leaders.

Request an Enrollment Trend Audit →