Woodcreek High School

Roseville · Placer County · Roseville Joint Union High
Public Placer County 🏛 Roseville Joint Union High → ~485 seniors CDS 3166928…
📄 Shareable scorecard →

Compare with peers

Most similar nearby schools

Antelope High School → West Park High School → Whitney High School → Rocklin High School → Granite Bay High School → Compare all similar →

Enrollment trend & projection

Total enrollment (9–12)
2,122 (2018)1,969 (2026)
-7.2%
Grade 12 (graduating class)
511 (2018)469 (2026)
-8.2%

If this trend holds (-0.9%/yr, Total enrollment)

At per-pupil funding of $ / student:

Horizon Projected Total enrollment Change Funding impact / yr
1 yr (2027) ~1,951 -18 $0
3 yr (2029) ~1,915 -54 $0
5 yr (2031) ~1,879 -90 $0

Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.

Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25

Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the Placer County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.

Critical
Material decline in demand.

Enrollment -8.2% vs. county +16.4% — losing far faster than the county. Each enrolled family matters more, but the engine of new enrollment is breaking down.

-8.2%  school enrollment (2018–2026)
+16.4%  Placer County baseline
-24.6pp  gap vs. county
92.4%  retention (county median 90.8%)
Enrollment — indexed to 100 at 2018
Stability rate by year (raw %)
Stability rate
92.4%
1,855 of 2,008 students

153 of 2,008 students who enrolled at Woodcreek High School this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (7.6% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.

Placer County median
90.8% · school is in the 70th percentile of 23 HS
Statewide median
87.2% · in the 77th percentile of 1,688 HS

Stability by student group

White (1,064) 94.1%
Socio. disadvantaged (805) 90.7%
Hispanic / Latino (445) 88.1%
Asian (202) 92.6%
Students w/ disabilities (186) 81.7%
Two or more races (114) 92.1%

Nearest peer high schools

Antelope High School 90.1% West Park High School 90.8% Whitney High School 94.7% Rocklin High School 95.1% Granite Bay High School 93.3%

Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.

Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25

Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: grades 9–12.

Chronic absent
9.9%
196 of 1,980 students

Low and stable absenteeism — students are engaged and showing up. The leading indicator is healthy.

Placer County median
15.1% · school is better than 82% of 22 HS
Statewide median
22.9%
Chronic absenteeism by year (raw %)

Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).

SBAC academic outcomes — grade 11, 2025

Share of grade-11 students meeting or exceeding the California standard on Smarter Balanced ELA and Math. This is the academic-readiness signal that pairs with UC Reach (post-grad outcomes), stability (retention), and absenteeism (engagement). Note: statewide median Math is only ~20% — a school at 20% isn't an outlier; one at 45%+ genuinely is.

ELA — met or exceeded
n = 448
60.9%
incl. 34.4% exceeded
-6.4 pts vs. Placer County median (67.3%) · CA median 54.3% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 79.3%
Math — met or exceeded
n = 449
39.2%
incl. 18.7% exceeded
On the Placer County median (40.2%) · CA median 21.1% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 53.6%

Source: California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) Smarter Balanced research files. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥30 tested students.

Student composition — 2025-26

HS grades 9–12 racial/ethnic composition and program subgroups, from CDE Census Day Enrollment. Two-year shift shown when ≥1 pt — surfaces how the community served has changed since 2023-24.

Race / ethnicity

White 50% -5.5
Hispanic / Latino 23% +1.3
Asian 10%
Two or more 8% +4.6
Filipino 3%
Not reported 3% +1.3
Black / African Am. 2% -1.0
Pacific Islander 1%
American Indian 1%

Program subgroups

Students w/ disabilities 39% -1.3
Socioeconomically disadv. 9%
English learners 4%
Homeless 1%

Source: California Department of Education, Census Day Enrollment 2025-26 (HS grades 9–12). Δ shown when shift is ≥1 pt since 2023-24. Categories below 0.5% omitted.

District financial profile — Roseville Joint Union High (FY2020)

From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.

Total revenue
$185.8M
+23.6% since FY2017
Per-pupil revenue
$17,486
10,627 students enrolled
Revenue mix
State: 34.9%
Local: 56.7%
Federal: 8.4%
Instruction share
54.4%
of current spending · $7,478/pupil
Long-term debt
$267.9M
+91.0% since FY2017
Total revenue by year ($M)
Total expenditure by year ($M)

Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the Roseville Joint Union High as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).

University of California outcomes · Class of 2025
UC Reach
13%
65 admits / 485 seniors
-2.3 pp vs. peer median (15.7%) · Ranked #8 of 10 similar schools
5-year trend
2021 · 11.7% 2025 · 13.4%
Where this sits on the California curve
CA median
18.5%
Top 10%
53.3%
This school
13.4%
0%50%100%
CA median 18.5% Top 10% ≥ 53.3% This school 13.4%

Higher than 34% of California high schools (1105 ranked, ≥50 seniors)

📊 What this number means

Woodcreek High School's UC Reach of 13.4% is below the California median (18.5%). The top 10% of CA schools achieve 53.3% or higher.

Overall, Woodcreek High School's UC Reach is higher than 34% of California high schools (1105 ranked).

UC Application Reach
67.0%
325 applications
In context: CA median 78.3% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 245.8% · higher than 42% of CA HS.
UC Admit Rate
20.0%
65 / 325 applications
In context: CA median 26.0% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 40.5% · higher than 16% of CA HS.
UC Yield Rate
29.2%
19 enrolled of 65 admitted
Yield vs. Enrollment Reach: Yield answers "of UC admits, what % chose UC?" — denominator is just the admits. A small admitted cohort can post a low yield even when the school sends a healthy share of its class to UC.
UC Enrollment Reach
3.9%
19 enrollees / 485 seniors
Enrollment Reach vs. Yield: Reach answers "of the whole senior class, what % ended up at UC?" — denominator is everyone. High Yield with low Enrollment Reach is common at elite privates: most admits matriculate, but the school sends most of its class to non-UC selective colleges.
Student-Counselor Ratio
394:1
5.0 FTE counselors · 1,969 students
In context: CA median 338:1 · 56 more students per counselor · ASCA target 250:1.
A-G Completion
66%
294 of 447 graduates · 2024-25 cohort
In context: CA median 55.9% · +9.9 pp above · Placer Co. 67.3%.
UC 6-Yr Grad Rate
88%
77% finished in 4 yrs · N=26 entered 2019
In context: CA median 88.6%.
Selective UC Reach (UCSD, UCSB, UCI, UCD)
8.7
per 100 seniors · campus-level total
In context: CA median 15.7 · Top 10% statewide ≥ 42.4 · higher than 17% of CA HS.
Elite UC Reach (UCB + UCLA)
1.6
per 100 seniors · campus-level total
In context: CA median 3.5 · Top 10% statewide ≥ 11.1 · higher than 18% of CA HS.
Senior Class Size
485
CDE grade 12 (exact)
Total School Enrollment
1,940
All grades · CDE Census Day
Economic Connectedness
1.38
75th percentile in CA · cross‑class friendships

Woodcreek High School — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot

Public · Roseville · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools

  • On UC Reach, Woodcreek High School sits near the bottom of its similar-school group (ranked #8 of 10): 13% vs. a peer median of 16%.
  • Its UC Reach has risen 3 points since 2018.
  • Senior-class enrollment is down 8% (511→469 from 2018 to 2026), trailing the peer-group median of +1%.
  • At its recent rate (-0.9%/yr), enrollment projects to ~1915 by 2029 — about 54 fewer students than today.

Enrollment projection

1969 students (2026)
~1915 projected (2029)
at -0.9%/yr

That's about 54 fewer students. At per-student funding of $ per student, that's roughly $0 in annual state funding at risk.

Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423 per ADA) — adjust to your district's actual per-pupil figure. Projection extrapolates the recent annual rate — not a forecast of intent.

Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools

School Type Size UC Reach Enroll. trend
Woodcreek High School Public 1969 13.4% -8%
Peer-group median 15.7% +1%
Antelope High School Public 1781 14.3% +1%
West Park High School Public 2386 21.1% +93%
Whitney High School Public 2080 26.7% +16%
Rocklin High School Public 1861 20.3% -9%
Granite Bay High School Public 2064 39.1% -2%
John Adams Academy - Roseville Public 1630 +11%
Bella Vista High School Public 1909 14.3% +2%
Roseville High School Public 1458 13.3% -25%
Grant Union High Public 2124 15.7% +20%
Rio Linda Senior High School Public 1641 9.4% +1%

UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →

Avg. Applicant GPA · top-6 UCs
3.96
Avg. Admitted GPA · top-6 UCs
4.19

Admit rate vs. CA peer average, by campus

How does this school's admit rate at each UC compare to other CA schools whose applicant pool averages the same GPA?

Campus Applicant GPA (avg) Actual admit rate CA peer avg Δ Verdict
UC Berkeley 4.00 6.0% 12.6% -6.6pp Under
UCLA 4.00 10.4% 9.3% +1.2pp On target
UC San Diego 3.95 22.2% 21.1% +1.1pp On target
UC Santa Barbara 3.90 32.0% 28.6% +3.4pp On target
UC Irvine 3.95 11.5% 24.6% -13.1pp Under
UC Davis 3.98 32.4% 32.7% -0.3pp On target
"Applicant GPA" is the average GPA of this school's UC applicant pool — not an individual student GPA. "CA peer avg" is the application-weighted statewide admit rate at this school-pool GPA, fit separately per campus. At any given pool GPA, real admit rates span widely (UCSD ranges 8% → 65% across CA schools) because UCs use comprehensive review — context-of-opportunity, geography, demographics, and applicant essays all weigh in beyond GPA. A large negative residual flags this school is admitted at a meaningfully lower rate than other CA schools at the same pool GPA — not that students here were "rejected at expected rate X." "Over" / "Under" use a ±5-point band. Campuses with fewer than 5 applicants are omitted.

Where Woodcreek High School sits vs. all California schools

Overall, this school admits its UC applicants in line with what their GPAs predict (20.0% actual vs. 22.3% expected).

UC Outcomes Trend — 2018–2025

UC Admit Rate %
UC Reach % (where available)
UC Admits (count, right axis)

Class size from CDE grade 12 enrollment. Campus-level data — applicant/admit totals may count a student at multiple campuses more than once.

Campus Breakdown — 2025

Campus Applicants Admits Enrollees Admit Rate UC Reach Yield Avg GPA (App) Avg GPA (Adm)
UC Berkeley → Elite 50 3 6.0% 0.6% 4.00
UCLA → Elite 48 5 5 10.4% 1.0% 100.0% 4.00 4.19
UC San Diego → Selective 54 12 22.2% 2.5% 3.95 4.25
UC Santa Barbara → Selective 50 16 4 32.0% 3.3% 25.0% 3.90 4.22
UC Irvine → Selective 52 6 11.5% 1.2% 3.95 4.12
UC Davis → 71 23 10 32.4% 4.7% 43.5% 3.98 4.16
⚠ Campus-level totals may count one student admitted to multiple UC campuses more than once. Admit Volume metrics are not the same as UC Reach, which requires unique-student counts. See methodology →

What This Means

A large share of the senior class applies to UC, indicating strong college-going culture and UC pipeline development.
A large share of the class applies to UC, so the admit rate runs lower than the application volume alone might suggest — expected when many students apply broadly, including to reach campuses. UC Reach (which credits every admit relative to the class) is the truer read of how the class fares: a strong Reach alongside a moderate admit rate is healthy, not a contradiction.
Fewer than 15% of seniors are earning UC admission. This may reflect a high non-UC college-going rate, significant A-G completion gaps, or an early-stage UC pipeline. A deeper review of A-G readiness and counseling capacity is warranted.
Students are earning UC admission but enrolling elsewhere at a notable rate. This may reflect competition from private colleges, out-of-state flagships, cost considerations, or UC campus fit. Student outcome surveys can clarify.
Note: admit counts used here are campus-level totals. A student admitted to both UCLA and UCSD is counted twice. When UCOP unique-student data becomes available it will be loaded automatically and the labels will update.
Compare with other schools → See Placer County rankings →

Is your school winning the families it should?

An Enrollment Trend Audit benchmarks your enrollment against nearby schools, shows who's gaining and losing families, and lays out a plan to make families choose you — built around the outcomes your families value. Built for principals, heads of school, and district leaders.

Request an Enrollment Trend Audit →