Whitney High School

Rocklin · Placer County · Rocklin Unified
Public Placer County 🏛 Rocklin Unified → ~449 seniors CDS 3175085…
📄 Shareable scorecard →

Compare with peers

Most similar nearby schools

Rocklin High School → Woodcreek High School → Granite Bay High School → West Park High School → Twelve Bridges High School → Compare all similar →

Enrollment trend & projection

Total enrollment (9–12)
1,866 (2018)2,080 (2026)
+11.5%
Grade 12 (graduating class)
436 (2018)508 (2026)
+16.5%

If this trend holds (+1.4%/yr, Total enrollment)

At per-pupil funding of $ / student:

Horizon Projected Total enrollment Change Funding impact / yr
1 yr (2027) ~2,108 +28 $0
3 yr (2029) ~2,166 +86 $0
5 yr (2031) ~2,226 +146 $0

Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.

Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25

Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the Placer County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.

Healthy
Holding share of a shrinking market.

Whitney High School's enrollment is tracking Placer County's baseline (+16.5% vs. +16.4%), and 94.7% stability is elite. The demographic tide is the headwind; you're holding your share.

+16.5%  school enrollment (2018–2026)
+16.4%  Placer County baseline
+0.1pp  gap vs. county
94.7%  retention (county median 90.8%)
Enrollment — indexed to 100 at 2018
Stability rate by year (raw %)
Stability rate
94.7%
1,978 of 2,089 students

111 of 2,089 students who enrolled at Whitney High School this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (5.3% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.

Placer County median
90.8% · school is in the 87th percentile of 23 HS
Statewide median
87.2% · in the 88th percentile of 1,688 HS

Stability by student group

White (1,068) 95.8%
Socio. disadvantaged (487) 87.1%
Hispanic / Latino (381) 95.3%
Students w/ disabilities (242) 93.8%
Asian (238) 96.6%
Two or more races (180) 91.7%

Nearest peer high schools

Rocklin High School 95.1% Woodcreek High School 92.4% Granite Bay High School 93.3% West Park High School 90.8% Twelve Bridges High School 94.7%

Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.

Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25

Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: grades 9–12.

Chronic absent
13.2%
274 of 2,075 students

Absenteeism is up 4.4 pp since 2016-17. A rising absenteeism trend often precedes formal departure — worth investigating which subgroups are driving it.

Placer County median
15.1% · school is better than 64% of 22 HS
Statewide median
22.9%
Chronic absenteeism by year (raw %)

Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).

SBAC academic outcomes — grade 11, 2025

Share of grade-11 students meeting or exceeding the California standard on Smarter Balanced ELA and Math. This is the academic-readiness signal that pairs with UC Reach (post-grad outcomes), stability (retention), and absenteeism (engagement). Note: statewide median Math is only ~20% — a school at 20% isn't an outlier; one at 45%+ genuinely is.

ELA — met or exceeded
n = 475
71.4%
incl. 34.1% exceeded
+4.1 pts above Placer County median (67.3%) · CA median 54.3% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 79.3%
Math — met or exceeded
n = 480
42.3%
incl. 20.0% exceeded
+2.1 pts above Placer County median (40.2%) · CA median 21.1% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 53.6%

Source: California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) Smarter Balanced research files. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥30 tested students.

Student composition — 2025-26

HS grades 9–12 racial/ethnic composition and program subgroups, from CDE Census Day Enrollment. Two-year shift shown when ≥1 pt — surfaces how the community served has changed since 2023-24.

Race / ethnicity

White 50% -1.6
Hispanic / Latino 18%
Asian 12% +1.7
Two or more 8%
Filipino 5%
Not reported 2%
Black / African Am. 2%
American Indian 0%

Program subgroups

Students w/ disabilities 23% +5.9
Socioeconomically disadv. 12%
English learners 2%

Source: California Department of Education, Census Day Enrollment 2025-26 (HS grades 9–12). Δ shown when shift is ≥1 pt since 2023-24. Categories below 0.5% omitted.

District financial profile — Rocklin Unified (FY2020)

From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.

Total revenue
$179.8M
+11.9% since FY2017
Per-pupil revenue
$15,764
11,405 students enrolled
Revenue mix
State: 45.7%
Local: 47.7%
Federal: 6.6%
Instruction share
62.5%
of current spending · $7,968/pupil
Long-term debt
$138.9M
-12.4% since FY2017
Total revenue by year ($M)
Total expenditure by year ($M)

Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the Rocklin Unified as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).

University of California outcomes · Class of 2025
UC Reach
27%
120 admits / 449 seniors
+11.6 pp above peer median (15.1%) · Ranked #2 of 9 similar schools
5-year trend
2021 · 16.6% 2025 · 26.7%
Where this sits on the California curve
CA median
18.5%
Top 10%
53.3%
This school
26.7%
0%50%100%
CA median 18.5% Top 10% ≥ 53.3% This school 26.7%

Higher than 67% of California high schools (1105 ranked, ≥50 seniors)

📊 What this number means

Whitney High School's UC Reach of 26.7% is above the California median (18.5%). The top 10% of CA schools achieve 53.3% or higher.

For context, the elite tier (top 1%) clears 102.7% — a gap of 76 pp from where this school sits.

Overall, Whitney High School's UC Reach is higher than 67% of California high schools (1105 ranked).

UC Application Reach
117.8%
529 applications
Most seniors are applying to at least one of the six most selective UCs (applications counted at each campus).
In context: CA median 78.3% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 245.8% · higher than 67% of CA HS.
UC Admit Rate
22.7%
120 / 529 applications
In context: CA median 26.0% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 40.5% · higher than 31% of CA HS.
UC Yield Rate
30.8%
37 enrolled of 120 admitted
Yield vs. Enrollment Reach: Yield answers "of UC admits, what % chose UC?" — denominator is just the admits. A small admitted cohort can post a low yield even when the school sends a healthy share of its class to UC.
UC Enrollment Reach
8.2%
37 enrollees / 449 seniors
Enrollment Reach vs. Yield: Reach answers "of the whole senior class, what % ended up at UC?" — denominator is everyone. High Yield with low Enrollment Reach is common at elite privates: most admits matriculate, but the school sends most of its class to non-UC selective colleges.
Student-Counselor Ratio
520:1
4.0 FTE counselors · 2,080 students
In context: CA median 338:1 · 182 more students per counselor · ASCA target 250:1.
A-G Completion
73%
326 of 445 graduates · 2024-25 cohort
In context: CA median 55.9% · +17.4 pp above · Placer Co. 67.3%.
UC 6-Yr Grad Rate
91%
81% finished in 4 yrs · N=32 entered 2019
In context: CA median 88.6% · +2.0 pp above.
Selective UC Reach (UCSD, UCSB, UCI, UCD)
18.0
per 100 seniors · campus-level total
In context: CA median 15.7 · Top 10% statewide ≥ 42.4 · higher than 58% of CA HS.
Elite UC Reach (UCB + UCLA)
4.0
per 100 seniors · campus-level total
In context: CA median 3.5 · Top 10% statewide ≥ 11.1 · higher than 55% of CA HS.
Senior Class Size
449
CDE grade 12 (exact)
Total School Enrollment
2,041
All grades · CDE Census Day
Economic Connectedness
1.41
77th percentile in CA · cross‑class friendships

Whitney High School — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot

Public · Rocklin · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools

  • On UC Reach, Whitney High School sits near the top of its similar-school group (ranked #2 of 9): 27% vs. a peer median of 15%.
  • Its UC Reach has risen 13 points since 2018.
  • Senior-class enrollment is up 16% (436→508 from 2018 to 2026), outpacing the peer-group median of -0%.
  • Enrollment has been growing (+1.4%/yr); projects to ~2166 by 2029.

Enrollment projection

2080 students (2026)
~2166 projected (2029)
at +1.4%/yr

Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools

School Type Size UC Reach Enroll. trend
Whitney High School Public 2080 26.7% +16%
Peer-group median 15.1% -0%
Rocklin High School Public 1861 20.3% -9%
Woodcreek High School Public 1969 13.4% -8%
Granite Bay High School Public 2064 39.1% -2%
West Park High School Public 2386 21.1% +93%
Twelve Bridges High School Public 1377 14.8% +28%
John Adams Academy - Lincoln Public 1390 +14%
Del Oro High School Public 1636 15.4% -11%
John Adams Academy - Roseville Public 1630 +11%
Antelope High School Public 1781 14.3% +1%
Roseville High School Public 1458 13.3% -25%

UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →

Avg. Applicant GPA · top-6 UCs
3.98
Avg. Admitted GPA · top-6 UCs
4.21

Admit rate vs. CA peer average, by campus

How does this school's admit rate at each UC compare to other CA schools whose applicant pool averages the same GPA?

Campus Applicant GPA (avg) Actual admit rate CA peer avg Δ Verdict
UC Berkeley 4.01 15.5% 12.9% +2.6pp On target
UCLA 4.02 8.5% 9.4% -0.8pp On target
UC San Diego 3.98 21.4% 20.4% +1.0pp On target
UC Santa Barbara 3.94 30.7% 30.0% +0.7pp On target
UC Irvine 3.98 16.0% 25.7% -9.7pp Under
UC Davis 3.98 40.6% 32.7% +7.9pp Over
"Applicant GPA" is the average GPA of this school's UC applicant pool — not an individual student GPA. "CA peer avg" is the application-weighted statewide admit rate at this school-pool GPA, fit separately per campus. At any given pool GPA, real admit rates span widely (UCSD ranges 8% → 65% across CA schools) because UCs use comprehensive review — context-of-opportunity, geography, demographics, and applicant essays all weigh in beyond GPA. A large negative residual flags this school is admitted at a meaningfully lower rate than other CA schools at the same pool GPA — not that students here were "rejected at expected rate X." "Over" / "Under" use a ±5-point band. Campuses with fewer than 5 applicants are omitted.

Where Whitney High School sits vs. all California schools

Overall, this school admits its UC applicants in line with what their GPAs predict (22.7% actual vs. 22.4% expected).

UC Outcomes Trend — 2018–2025

UC Admit Rate %
UC Reach % (where available)
UC Admits (count, right axis)

Class size from CDE grade 12 enrollment. Campus-level data — applicant/admit totals may count a student at multiple campuses more than once.

Campus Breakdown — 2025

Campus Applicants Admits Enrollees Admit Rate UC Reach Yield Avg GPA (App) Avg GPA (Adm)
UC Berkeley → Elite 71 11 7 15.5% 2.4% 63.6% 4.01 4.21
UCLA → Elite 82 7 5 8.5% 1.6% 71.4% 4.02 4.21
UC San Diego → Selective 98 21 3 21.4% 4.7% 14.3% 3.98 4.24
UC Santa Barbara → Selective 88 27 7 30.7% 6.0% 25.9% 3.94 4.24
UC Irvine → Selective 94 15 5 16.0% 3.3% 33.3% 3.98 4.22
UC Davis → 96 39 10 40.6% 8.7% 25.6% 3.98 4.18
⚠ Campus-level totals may count one student admitted to multiple UC campuses more than once. Admit Volume metrics are not the same as UC Reach, which requires unique-student counts. See methodology →

What This Means

A large share of the senior class applies to UC, indicating strong college-going culture and UC pipeline development.
A large share of the class applies to UC, so the admit rate runs lower than the application volume alone might suggest — expected when many students apply broadly, including to reach campuses. UC Reach (which credits every admit relative to the class) is the truer read of how the class fares: a strong Reach alongside a moderate admit rate is healthy, not a contradiction.
Students are earning UC admission but enrolling elsewhere at a notable rate. This may reflect competition from private colleges, out-of-state flagships, cost considerations, or UC campus fit. Student outcome surveys can clarify.
The school generates broad UC access, but fewer students are reaching the most selective UC campuses (UCLA, Berkeley, UCSD, UCSB, UCI). Targeted academic enrichment and campus-fit advising may help.
Berkeley/UCLA admit volume is modest relative to overall UC reach. This is common and reflects the highly selective nature of those campuses, but may be a target area for the school's highest-performing students.
UC Reach has improved meaningfully compared to the prior year — a positive trajectory worth monitoring and reinforcing.
Note: admit counts used here are campus-level totals. A student admitted to both UCLA and UCSD is counted twice. When UCOP unique-student data becomes available it will be loaded automatically and the labels will update.
Compare with other schools → See Placer County rankings →

Is your school winning the families it should?

An Enrollment Trend Audit benchmarks your enrollment against nearby schools, shows who's gaining and losing families, and lays out a plan to make families choose you — built around the outcomes your families value. Built for principals, heads of school, and district leaders.

Request an Enrollment Trend Audit →