No UC admissions data on file for Thornton High.

This school doesn't appear in UCOP's source-school records (it may send few or no applicants to UC). Its enrollment trend and similar-school comparison are still below.

Enrollment trend & projection

Total enrollment (9–12)
143 (2018)106 (2026)
-25.9%
Grade 12 (graduating class)
82 (2018)52 (2026)
-36.6%

If this trend holds (-3.7%/yr, Total enrollment)

At per-pupil funding of $ / student:

Horizon Projected Total enrollment Change Funding impact / yr
1 yr (2027) ~102 -4 $0
3 yr (2029) ~95 -11 $0
5 yr (2031) ~88 -18 $0

Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.

Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25

Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the San Mateo County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.

Critical
Compounding decline on both vectors.

Enrollment -36.6% vs. county -5.3% AND stability (33.3%) below the county median. Recruitment and retention both under pressure — likely a foundational rather than tactical problem. Chronic absenteeism is also at 63.3% (up +33.7 pts from 2016-17) — engagement and demand are both signaling decline.

-36.6%  school enrollment (2018–2026)
-5.3%  San Mateo County baseline
-31.3pp  gap vs. county
33.3%  retention (county median 93.0%)
Enrollment — indexed to 100 at 2018
Stability rate by year (raw %)
Stability rate
33.3%
65 of 195 students

130 of 195 students who enrolled at Thornton High this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (66.7% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.

San Mateo County median
93.0% · school is in the 4th percentile of 28 HS
Statewide median
87.2% · in the 9th percentile of 1,688 HS

Stability by student group

Hispanic / Latino (107) 37.4%
Socio. disadvantaged (100) 39.0%
English learners (55) 32.7%
Filipino (33) 27.3%
Students w/ disabilities (28) 32.1%
White (26) 30.8%

Nearest peer high schools

Baden High (continuation) 35.9% Academy (the)- Sf @mcateer 89.4% Peninsula High (continuation) 62.6% Gateway To College High At Laney College 62.8% Kipp San Francisco College Preparatory 85.9%

Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.

Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25

Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: grades 9–12.

Chronic absent
63.3%
112 of 177 students

Absenteeism is up 33.7 pp since 2016-17. A rising absenteeism trend often precedes formal departure — worth investigating which subgroups are driving it.

San Mateo County median
20.1% · school is worse than 89% of 28 HS
Statewide median
22.9%
Chronic absenteeism by year (raw %)

Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).

SBAC academic outcomes — grade 11, 2025

Share of grade-11 students meeting or exceeding the California standard on Smarter Balanced ELA and Math. This is the academic-readiness signal that pairs with UC Reach (post-grad outcomes), stability (retention), and absenteeism (engagement). Note: statewide median Math is only ~20% — a school at 20% isn't an outlier; one at 45%+ genuinely is.

ELA — met or exceeded
n = 34
14.7%
incl. 0.0% exceeded
-45.3 pts vs. San Mateo County median (60.0%) · CA median 54.3% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 79.3%
Math — met or exceeded
n = 37
2.7%
incl. 0.0% exceeded
-29.8 pts vs. San Mateo County median (32.5%) · CA median 21.1% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 53.6%

Source: California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) Smarter Balanced research files. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥30 tested students.

Student composition — 2025-26

HS grades 9–12 racial/ethnic composition and program subgroups, from CDE Census Day Enrollment. Two-year shift shown when ≥1 pt — surfaces how the community served has changed since 2023-24.

Race / ethnicity

Hispanic / Latino 53% +1.1
White 18% +11.9
Filipino 13% -7.5
Two or more 7% -2.9
Black / African Am. 5%
Asian 3%
American Indian 2% +1.0

Program subgroups

Students w/ disabilities 41% -15.4
English learners 26%

Source: California Department of Education, Census Day Enrollment 2025-26 (HS grades 9–12). Δ shown when shift is ≥1 pt since 2023-24. Categories below 0.5% omitted.

District financial profile — Jefferson Union High (FY2020)

From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.

Total revenue
$103.6M
+18.8% since FY2017
Per-pupil revenue
$24,457
4,236 students enrolled
Revenue mix
State: 12.6%
Local: 82.2%
Federal: 5.2%
Instruction share
52.2%
of current spending · $8,692/pupil
Long-term debt
$347.9M
+31.8% since FY2017
Total revenue by year ($M)
Total expenditure by year ($M)

Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the Jefferson Union High as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).

Thornton High — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot

Public · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools

  • Senior-class enrollment is down 37% (82→52 from 2018 to 2026), trailing the peer-group median of +24%.
  • At its recent rate (-3.7%/yr), enrollment projects to ~95 by 2029 — about 11 fewer students than today.

Enrollment projection

106 students (2026)
~95 projected (2029)
at -3.7%/yr

That's about 11 fewer students. At per-student funding of $ per student, that's roughly $0 in annual state funding at risk.

Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423 per ADA) — adjust to your district's actual per-pupil figure. Projection extrapolates the recent annual rate — not a forecast of intent.

Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools

School Type Size UC Reach Enroll. trend
Thornton High Public 106 -37%
Peer-group median 6.7% +24%
Baden High (continuation) Public 111 +60%
Academy (the)- Sf @mcateer Public 98 -72%
Peninsula High (continuation) Public 119 -19%
Gateway To College High At Laney College Public 100 -11%
Kipp San Francisco College Preparatory Public 177 -40%
Dewey High School Public 127 -52%
Downtown High Public 182 +352%
S.f. County Opportunity (hilltop) Public 59 +85%
Wells (ida B.) High Public 192 +150%
Independence High Public 204 6.7% +138%

UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →

Is your school winning the families it should?

An Enrollment Trend Audit benchmarks your enrollment against nearby schools, shows who's gaining and losing families, and lays out a plan to make families choose you — built around the outcomes your families value. Built for principals, heads of school, and district leaders.

Request an Enrollment Trend Audit →