Peninsula High (continuation)

· San Mateo County · San Mateo Union High
Public San Mateo County 🏛 San Mateo Union High → CDS 4169047…
📄 Shareable scorecard →

Compare with peers

Most similar nearby schools

Baden High (continuation) → Thornton High → Lincoln High (continuation) → Academy (the)- Sf @mcateer → Redwood High → Compare all similar →

No UC admissions data on file for Peninsula High (continuation).

This school doesn't appear in UCOP's source-school records (it may send few or no applicants to UC). Its enrollment trend and similar-school comparison are still below.

Enrollment trend & projection

Total enrollment (9–12)
141 (2018)119 (2026)
-15.6%
Grade 12 (graduating class)
89 (2018)72 (2026)
-19.1%

If this trend holds (-2.1%/yr, Total enrollment)

At per-pupil funding of $ / student:

Horizon Projected Total enrollment Change Funding impact / yr
1 yr (2027) ~117 -2 $0
3 yr (2029) ~112 -7 $0
5 yr (2031) ~107 -12 $0

Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.

Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25

Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the San Mateo County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.

Critical
Compounding decline on both vectors.

Enrollment -19.1% vs. county -5.3% AND stability (62.6%) below the county median. Recruitment and retention both under pressure — likely a foundational rather than tactical problem. Chronic absenteeism is also at 78.4% (up +12.6 pts from 2017-18) — engagement and demand are both signaling decline.

-19.1%  school enrollment (2018–2026)
-5.3%  San Mateo County baseline
-13.8pp  gap vs. county
62.6%  retention (county median 93.0%)
Enrollment — indexed to 100 at 2018
Stability rate by year (raw %)
Stability rate
62.6%
112 of 179 students

67 of 179 students who enrolled at Peninsula High (continuation) this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (37.4% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.

San Mateo County median
93.0% · school is in the 14th percentile of 28 HS
Statewide median
87.2% · in the 22nd percentile of 1,688 HS

Stability by student group

Hispanic / Latino (133) 63.2%
Socio. disadvantaged (115) 58.3%
English learners (65) 55.4%
Students w/ disabilities (26) 73.1%

Nearest peer high schools

Baden High (continuation) 35.9% Thornton High 33.3% Lincoln High (continuation) 50.7% Academy (the)- Sf @mcateer 89.4% Redwood High 41.3%

Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.

Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25

Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: grades 9–12.

Chronic absent
78.4%
138 of 176 students

Absenteeism is up 12.6 pp since 2017-18. A rising absenteeism trend often precedes formal departure — worth investigating which subgroups are driving it.

San Mateo County median
20.1% · school is worse than 93% of 28 HS
Statewide median
22.9%
Chronic absenteeism by year (raw %)

Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).

SBAC academic outcomes — grade 11, 2025

Share of grade-11 students meeting or exceeding the California standard on Smarter Balanced ELA and Math. This is the academic-readiness signal that pairs with UC Reach (post-grad outcomes), stability (retention), and absenteeism (engagement). Note: statewide median Math is only ~20% — a school at 20% isn't an outlier; one at 45%+ genuinely is.

ELA — met or exceeded
n = 35
11.4%
incl. 0.0% exceeded
-48.6 pts vs. San Mateo County median (60.0%) · CA median 54.3% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 79.3%
Math — met or exceeded
n = 34
5.9%
incl. 2.9% exceeded
-26.6 pts vs. San Mateo County median (32.5%) · CA median 21.1% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 53.6%

Source: California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) Smarter Balanced research files. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥30 tested students.

Student composition — 2025-26

HS grades 9–12 racial/ethnic composition and program subgroups, from CDE Census Day Enrollment. Two-year shift shown when ≥1 pt — surfaces how the community served has changed since 2023-24.

Race / ethnicity

Hispanic / Latino 75% -6.9
Pacific Islander 7% +1.3
White 6% +1.6
Two or more 6% +2.1
Filipino 4% +2.6
Asian 2% -1.0
Black / African Am. 1%

Program subgroups

Students w/ disabilities 70% +13.2
English learners 43% -11.9
Socioeconomically disadv. 13% +6.9

Source: California Department of Education, Census Day Enrollment 2025-26 (HS grades 9–12). Δ shown when shift is ≥1 pt since 2023-24. Categories below 0.5% omitted.

District financial profile — San Mateo Union High (FY2020)

From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.

Total revenue
$262.3M
+20.1% since FY2017
Per-pupil revenue
$28,504
9,203 students enrolled
Revenue mix
State: 11.5%
Local: 85.0%
Federal: 3.6%
Instruction share
52.6%
of current spending · $10,712/pupil
Long-term debt
$689.8M
+2.0% since FY2017
Total revenue by year ($M)
Total expenditure by year ($M)

Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the San Mateo Union High as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).

Peninsula High (continuation) — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot

Public · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools

  • Senior-class enrollment is down 19% (89→72 from 2018 to 2026), outpacing the peer-group median of -32%.
  • At its recent rate (-2.1%/yr), enrollment projects to ~112 by 2029 — about 7 fewer students than today.

Enrollment projection

119 students (2026)
~112 projected (2029)
at -2.1%/yr

That's about 7 fewer students. At per-student funding of $ per student, that's roughly $0 in annual state funding at risk.

Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423 per ADA) — adjust to your district's actual per-pupil figure. Projection extrapolates the recent annual rate — not a forecast of intent.

Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools

School Type Size UC Reach Enroll. trend
Peninsula High (continuation) Public 119 -19%
Peer-group median 8.5% -32%
Baden High (continuation) Public 111 +60%
Thornton High Public 106 -37%
Lincoln High (continuation) Public 112 -31%
Academy (the)- Sf @mcateer Public 98 -72%
Redwood High Public 157 -32%
Kipp San Francisco College Preparatory Public 177 -40%
Downtown High Public 182 +352%
Wells (ida B.) High Public 192 +150%
Independence High Public 204 6.7% +138%
Tide Academy Public 199 10.3% -43%

UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →

Is your school winning the families it should?

An Enrollment Trend Audit benchmarks your enrollment against nearby schools, shows who's gaining and losing families, and lays out a plan to make families choose you — built around the outcomes your families value. Built for principals, heads of school, and district leaders.

Request an Enrollment Trend Audit →