Thomas Page Academy

· Sonoma County · Cotati-Rohnert Park Unified
Public Sonoma County 🏛 Cotati-Rohnert Park Unified → CDS 4973882…
📄 Shareable scorecard →

Compare with peers

Most similar nearby schools

Pathways Charter → Technology High School → Credo High School → Manzanita Elementary Charter → Spring Lake Charter → Compare all similar →

No UC admissions data on file for Thomas Page Academy.

This school doesn't appear in UCOP's source-school records (it may send few or no applicants to UC). Its enrollment trend and similar-school comparison are still below.

Enrollment trend & projection

Total enrollment
405 (2018)403 (2026)
-0.5%

If this trend holds (-0.1%/yr, Total enrollment)

At per-pupil funding of $ / student:

Horizon Projected Total enrollment Change Funding impact / yr
1 yr (2027) ~403 +0 $0
3 yr (2029) ~402 -1 $0
5 yr (2031) ~402 -1 $0

Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.

Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25

Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the Sonoma County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.

Stability rate
89.6%
412 of 460 students

48 of 460 students who enrolled at Thomas Page Academy this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (10.4% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.

Sonoma County median
92.0% · school is in the 25th percentile of 59 HS
Statewide median
88.7% · in the 56th percentile of 2,648 HS

Stability by student group

Socio. disadvantaged (358) 89.7%
Hispanic / Latino (291) 89.7%
English learners (156) 89.7%
Students w/ disabilities (87) 90.8%
White (83) 90.4%
Black / African Am. (22) 86.4%

Nearest peer high schools

Pathways Charter 64.4% Technology High School 96.8% Credo High School 91.6% Manzanita Elementary Charter 93.3% Spring Lake Charter 94.9%

Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.

Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25

Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: total enrollment.

Chronic absent
21.9%
98 of 447 students

Absenteeism is up 11.3 pp since 2016-17. A rising absenteeism trend often precedes formal departure — worth investigating which subgroups are driving it.

Sonoma County median
17.5% · school is worse than 66% of 58 HS
Statewide median
20.9%
Chronic absenteeism by year (raw %)

Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).

District financial profile — Cotati-Rohnert Park Unified (FY2020)

From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.

Total revenue
$90.2M
+1.6% since FY2017
Per-pupil revenue
$15,783
5,717 students enrolled
Revenue mix
State: 36.0%
Local: 56.2%
Federal: 7.8%
Instruction share
54.7%
of current spending · $7,516/pupil
Long-term debt
$171.1M
+10.8% since FY2017
Total revenue by year ($M)
Total expenditure by year ($M)

Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the Cotati-Rohnert Park Unified as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).

Thomas Page Academy — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot

Public · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools

  • At its recent rate (-0.1%/yr), enrollment projects to ~402 by 2029 — about 1 fewer students than today.

Enrollment projection

403 students (2026)
~402 projected (2029)
at -0.1%/yr

That's about 1 fewer students. At per-student funding of $ per student, that's roughly $0 in annual state funding at risk.

Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423 per ADA) — adjust to your district's actual per-pupil figure. Projection extrapolates the recent annual rate — not a forecast of intent.

Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools

School Type Size UC Reach Enroll. trend
Thomas Page Academy Public 403
Peer-group median 26.5% +10%
Pathways Charter Public 379 -32%
Technology High School Public 344 31.6% +10%
Credo High School Public 487 21.3% +235%
Manzanita Elementary Charter Public 395
Spring Lake Charter Public 393
Village Elementary Charter Public 388
Santa Rosa Charter School For The Arts Public 375
Loma Vista Immersion Academy Public 450
Wright Charter Public 342
Petaluma Junior High Public 492

UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →

Is your school winning the families it should?

An Enrollment Trend Audit benchmarks your enrollment against nearby schools, shows who's gaining and losing families, and lays out a plan to make families choose you — built around the outcomes your families value. Built for principals, heads of school, and district leaders.

Request an Enrollment Trend Audit →