No UC admissions data on file for Tehama Elearning Academy.
This school doesn't appear in UCOP's source-school records (it may send few or no applicants to UC). Its enrollment trend and similar-school comparison are still below.
Tehama Elearning Academy
· Tehama County · Tehama County Department of Education · Public
📄 Shareable scorecard →Compare with peers
Most similar nearby schools
Salisbury High (continuation) → Anderson New Technology High → Los Molinos High School → California Heritage Youthbuild Academy Ii → Northern Summit Academy Shasta → Compare all similar →📋 At a glance
- Program details not reported to CRDC
- Academic signals not yet ingested for this school
Composed from federal CRDC offerings, EDFacts ACGR, and other public data. Full breakdowns below.
How Tehama Elearning Academy compares for families
What families should know about Tehama Elearning Academy.
- ▸ vs Similar SchoolsThe closest comparables nearby: Salisbury High (continuation), Anderson New Technology High, Los Molinos High School and 2 more. See the sidebar to compare side-by-side.
For Parents
Follow Tehama Elearning Academy
Get an email when Tehama Elearning Academy's numbers change — new admissions results, enrollment shifts, test scores. A few updates a year, no spam.
SBAC academic outcomes — grade 11, 2025
Share of grade-11 students meeting or exceeding the California standard on Smarter Balanced ELA and Math. This is the academic-readiness signal that pairs with UC Reach (post-grad outcomes), stability (retention), and absenteeism (engagement). Note: statewide median Math is only ~20% — a school at 20% isn't an outlier; one at 45%+ genuinely is.
Source: California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) Smarter Balanced research files. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥30 tested students.
Student composition — 2025-26
HS grades 9–12 racial/ethnic composition and program subgroups, from CDE Census Day Enrollment. Two-year shift shown when ≥1 pt — surfaces how the community served has changed since 2023-24.
Race / ethnicity
Program subgroups
Source: California Department of Education, Census Day Enrollment 2025-26 (HS grades 9–12). Δ shown when shift is ≥1 pt since 2023-24. Categories below 0.5% omitted.
Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25
Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: grades 9–12.
Absenteeism is down 16.1 pp since 2016-17. Engagement improving — a positive trajectory worth understanding and reinforcing.
Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).
Enrollment trend & projection
If this trend holds (+3.1%/yr, Total enrollment)
At per-pupil funding of $ / student:
| Horizon | Projected Total enrollment | Change | Funding impact / yr |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 yr (2027) | ~134 | +4 | $0 |
| 3 yr (2029) | ~142 | +12 | $0 |
| 5 yr (2031) | ~151 | +21 | $0 |
Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.
Tehama Elearning Academy — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot
Public · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools
- ▸Senior-class enrollment is up 86% (22→41 from 2018 to 2026), outpacing the peer-group median of -2%.
- ▸Enrollment has been growing (+3.1%/yr); projects to ~142 by 2029.
Enrollment projection
Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools
| School | Type | Size | UC Reach | Enroll. trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tehama Elearning Academy | Public | 130 | — | +86% |
| Peer-group median | 5.6% | -2% | ||
| Salisbury High (continuation) | Public | 104 | — | +21% |
| Anderson New Technology High | Public | 130 | — | -26% |
| Los Molinos High School | Public | 213 | 5.6% | -2% |
| California Heritage Youthbuild Academy Ii | Public | 156 | — | -55% |
| Northern Summit Academy Shasta | Public | 209 | — | +48% |
| North Valley High | Public | 75 | — | +0% |
| Oakview High (alternative) | Public | 64 | — | -3% |
| Chester Junior/Senior High | Public | 124 | — | -16% |
| Stellar Charter | Public | 239 | — | -14% |
| Pioneer Continuation High | Public | 202 | — | +13% |
UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →
Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25
Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the Tehama County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.
Tehama Elearning Academy outperformed Tehama County on enrollment (school +86.4% vs. county +5.8%) AND maintains 73.0% stability. Replicable model — worth documenting what's working. Chronic absenteeism is rising (25.0%, +-15.8 pts since 2016-17) — a watch signal worth monitoring as a leading indicator.
37 of 137 students who enrolled at Tehama Elearning Academy this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (27.0% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.
Stability by student group
Nearest peer high schools
Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.
District financial profile — Tehama County Department of Education (FY2020)
From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.
Local: 32.3%
Federal: 14.7%
Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the Tehama County Department of Education as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).
For School Admins
The full Reach Report for Tehama Elearning Academy
A board- and LCAP-ready intelligence brief: your enrollment retention and college outcomes, benchmarked against your closest competitors, with a 5-year forecast, concrete steps to act on, and the rigor + outcomes story you can share with your families. Built from primary public data — prepared for you, not auto-generated.
- ✓Your 5-year enrollment forecast (currently 3.1%/yr) with the revenue at stake
- ✓Student-retention benchmarking vs your county median — and the LCAP evidence to back your goals