Chester Junior/Senior High

· Plumas County · Plumas Unified
Public Plumas County 🏛 Plumas Unified → CDS 3266969…
📄 Shareable scorecard →

Compare with peers

Most similar nearby schools

Westwood High School → Plumas Charter School → Anderson New Technology High → Thompson Peak Charter → Hometech Charter → Compare all similar →

No UC admissions data on file for Chester Junior/Senior High.

This school doesn't appear in UCOP's source-school records (it may send few or no applicants to UC). Its enrollment trend and similar-school comparison are still below.

Enrollment trend & projection

Total enrollment (9–12)
173 (2018)124 (2026)
-28.3%
Grade 12 (graduating class)
25 (2018)21 (2026)
-16.0%

If this trend holds (-4.1%/yr, Total enrollment)

At per-pupil funding of $ / student:

Horizon Projected Total enrollment Change Funding impact / yr
1 yr (2027) ~119 -5 $0
3 yr (2029) ~109 -15 $0
5 yr (2031) ~101 -23 $0

Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.

Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25

Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the Plumas County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.

Critical
Material decline in demand.

Enrollment -16.0% vs. county +10.8% — losing 1.5× the county rate. Each enrolled family matters more, but the engine of new enrollment is breaking down. Chronic absenteeism is also at 33.8% (up +21.4 pts from 2016-17) — engagement and demand are both signaling decline.

-16.0%  school enrollment (2018–2026)
+10.8%  Plumas County baseline
-26.8pp  gap vs. county
89.1%  retention (county median 87.7%)
Enrollment — indexed to 100 at 2018
Stability rate
89.1%
82 of 92 students

10 of 92 students who enrolled at Chester Junior/Senior High this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (10.9% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.

Plumas County median
87.7% · school is in the 100th percentile of 3 HS
Statewide median
87.2% · in the 60th percentile of 1,688 HS

Stability by student group

White (99) 85.9%
Socio. disadvantaged (71) 77.5%
Students w/ disabilities (24) 87.5%

Nearest peer high schools

Westwood High School 75.9% Plumas Charter School 83.1% Anderson New Technology High 62.0% Thompson Peak Charter 66.7% Hometech Charter 55.5%

Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.

Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25

Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: grades 9–12.

Chronic absent
35.2%
31 of 88 students

Absenteeism is up 22.8 pp since 2016-17. A rising absenteeism trend often precedes formal departure — worth investigating which subgroups are driving it.

Plumas County median
27.1% · school is worse than 67% of 3 HS
Statewide median
22.9%

Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).

SBAC academic outcomes — grade 11, 2025

Share of grade-11 students meeting or exceeding the California standard on Smarter Balanced ELA and Math. This is the academic-readiness signal that pairs with UC Reach (post-grad outcomes), stability (retention), and absenteeism (engagement). Note: statewide median Math is only ~20% — a school at 20% isn't an outlier; one at 45%+ genuinely is.

ELA — met or exceeded
n = 19
31.6%
incl. 5.3% exceeded
-20.8 pts vs. Plumas County median (52.4%) · CA median 54.3% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 79.3%
Math — met or exceeded
n = 17
23.5%
incl. 11.8% exceeded
+15.8 pts above Plumas County median (7.7%) · CA median 21.1% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 53.6%

Source: California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) Smarter Balanced research files. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥30 tested students.

Student composition — 2025-26

HS grades 9–12 racial/ethnic composition and program subgroups, from CDE Census Day Enrollment. Two-year shift shown when ≥1 pt — surfaces how the community served has changed since 2023-24.

Race / ethnicity

White 69% -8.3
Hispanic / Latino 14% +5.1
Two or more 9% +4.5
Not reported 5%
American Indian 3% +1.5

Program subgroups

Students w/ disabilities 33% -19.5

Source: California Department of Education, Census Day Enrollment 2025-26 (HS grades 9–12). Δ shown when shift is ≥1 pt since 2023-24. Categories below 0.5% omitted.

District financial profile — Plumas Unified (FY2020)

From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.

Total revenue
$37.3M
+11.4% since FY2017
Per-pupil revenue
$22,478
1,661 students enrolled
Revenue mix
State: 17.5%
Local: 71.1%
Federal: 11.3%
Instruction share
45.4%
of current spending · $7,808/pupil
Long-term debt
$54.3M
+205.0% since FY2017
Total revenue by year ($M)
Total expenditure by year ($M)

Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the Plumas Unified as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).

Chester Junior/Senior High — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot

Public · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools

  • Senior-class enrollment is down 16% (25→21 from 2018 to 2026), outpacing the peer-group median of -20%.
  • At its recent rate (-4.1%/yr), enrollment projects to ~109 by 2029 — about 15 fewer students than today.

Enrollment projection

124 students (2026)
~109 projected (2029)
at -4.1%/yr

That's about 15 fewer students. At per-student funding of $ per student, that's roughly $0 in annual state funding at risk.

Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423 per ADA) — adjust to your district's actual per-pupil figure. Projection extrapolates the recent annual rate — not a forecast of intent.

Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools

School Type Size UC Reach Enroll. trend
Chester Junior/Senior High Public 124 -16%
Peer-group median -20%
Westwood High School Public 49 +11%
Plumas Charter School Public 141 -19%
Anderson New Technology High Public 130 -26%
Thompson Peak Charter Public 174 -32%
Hometech Charter Public 145 +41%
Mt. Lassen Charter Public 147 +57%
Salisbury High (continuation) Public 104 +21%
Fair View High (continuation) Public 100 -20%
California Heritage Youthbuild Academy Ii Public 156 -55%
Prospect High (continuation) Public 81 -27%

UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →

Is your school winning the families it should?

An Enrollment Trend Audit benchmarks your enrollment against nearby schools, shows who's gaining and losing families, and lays out a plan to make families choose you — built around the outcomes your families value. Built for principals, heads of school, and district leaders.

Request an Enrollment Trend Audit →