Oakview High (alternative)

· Shasta County · Anderson Union High
Public Shasta County 🏛 Anderson Union High → CDS 4569856…
📄 Shareable scorecard →

Compare with peers

Most similar nearby schools

North Valley High → Shasta Collegiate Academy → Anderson New Technology High → Mountain Lakes High → California Heritage Youthbuild Academy Ii → Compare all similar →

No UC admissions data on file for Oakview High (alternative).

This school doesn't appear in UCOP's source-school records (it may send few or no applicants to UC). Its enrollment trend and similar-school comparison are still below.

Enrollment trend & projection

Total enrollment (9–12)
98 (2018)64 (2026)
-34.7%
Grade 12 (graduating class)
37 (2018)36 (2026)
-2.7%

If this trend holds (-5.2%/yr, Total enrollment)

At per-pupil funding of $ / student:

Horizon Projected Total enrollment Change Funding impact / yr
1 yr (2027) ~61 -3 $0
3 yr (2029) ~55 -9 $0
5 yr (2031) ~49 -15 $0

Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.

Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25

Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the Shasta County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.

Critical
Compounding decline on both vectors.

Enrollment -2.7% vs. county +12.3% AND stability (50.0%) below the county median. Recruitment and retention both under pressure — likely a foundational rather than tactical problem. Chronic absenteeism is also at 60.0% (up +60.0 pts from 2016-17) — engagement and demand are both signaling decline.

-2.7%  school enrollment (2018–2026)
+12.3%  Shasta County baseline
-15.0pp  gap vs. county
50.0%  retention (county median 79.1%)
Enrollment — indexed to 100 at 2018
Stability rate by year (raw %)
Stability rate
50.0%
64 of 128 students

64 of 128 students who enrolled at Oakview High (alternative) this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (50.0% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.

Shasta County median
79.1% · school is in the 25th percentile of 20 HS
Statewide median
87.2% · in the 17th percentile of 1,688 HS

Stability by student group

White (88) 52.3%
Socio. disadvantaged (86) 48.8%
Students w/ disabilities (30) 46.7%
Hispanic / Latino (24) 29.2%

Nearest peer high schools

North Valley High 28.5% Shasta Collegiate Academy 38.1% Anderson New Technology High 62.0% Mountain Lakes High 36.8% California Heritage Youthbuild Academy Ii 50.4%

Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.

Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25

Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: grades 9–12.

Chronic absent
60.0%
69 of 115 students

Absenteeism is up 60.0 pp since 2016-17. A rising absenteeism trend often precedes formal departure — worth investigating which subgroups are driving it.

Shasta County median
25.2% · school is worse than 80% of 20 HS
Statewide median
22.9%
Chronic absenteeism by year (raw %)

Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).

SBAC academic outcomes — grade 11, 2025

Share of grade-11 students meeting or exceeding the California standard on Smarter Balanced ELA and Math. This is the academic-readiness signal that pairs with UC Reach (post-grad outcomes), stability (retention), and absenteeism (engagement). Note: statewide median Math is only ~20% — a school at 20% isn't an outlier; one at 45%+ genuinely is.

ELA — met or exceeded
n = 25
12.0%
incl. 4.0% exceeded
-43.4 pts vs. Shasta County median (55.4%) · CA median 54.3% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 79.3%
Math — met or exceeded
n = 25
12.0%
incl. 4.0% exceeded
-21.1 pts vs. Shasta County median (33.1%) · CA median 21.1% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 53.6%

Source: California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) Smarter Balanced research files. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥30 tested students.

Student composition — 2025-26

HS grades 9–12 racial/ethnic composition and program subgroups, from CDE Census Day Enrollment. Two-year shift shown when ≥1 pt — surfaces how the community served has changed since 2023-24.

Race / ethnicity

White 70% -1.3
Hispanic / Latino 17% +3.5
Two or more 5% +2.6
Asian 3% +1.0
American Indian 3% -6.4
Black / African Am. 2%

Program subgroups

Students w/ disabilities 34% -29.8

Source: California Department of Education, Census Day Enrollment 2025-26 (HS grades 9–12). Δ shown when shift is ≥1 pt since 2023-24. Categories below 0.5% omitted.

District financial profile — Anderson Union High (FY2020)

From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.

Total revenue
$26.7M
+9.0% since FY2017
Per-pupil revenue
$16,498
1,619 students enrolled
Revenue mix
State: 49.9%
Local: 38.2%
Federal: 11.9%
Instruction share
51.3%
of current spending · $7,265/pupil
Long-term debt
$11.2M
-0.4% since FY2017
Total revenue by year ($M)
Total expenditure by year ($M)

Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the Anderson Union High as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).

Oakview High (alternative) — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot

Public · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools

  • Senior-class enrollment is down 3% (37→36 from 2018 to 2026), trailing the peer-group median of +0%.
  • At its recent rate (-5.2%/yr), enrollment projects to ~55 by 2029 — about 9 fewer students than today.

Enrollment projection

64 students (2026)
~55 projected (2029)
at -5.2%/yr

That's about 9 fewer students. At per-student funding of $ per student, that's roughly $0 in annual state funding at risk.

Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423 per ADA) — adjust to your district's actual per-pupil figure. Projection extrapolates the recent annual rate — not a forecast of intent.

Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools

School Type Size UC Reach Enroll. trend
Oakview High (alternative) Public 64 -3%
Peer-group median +0%
North Valley High Public 75 +0%
Shasta Collegiate Academy Public 75 -48%
Anderson New Technology High Public 130 -26%
Mountain Lakes High Public 64 +12%
California Heritage Youthbuild Academy Ii Public 156 -55%
Northern Summit Academy Shasta Public 209 +48%
Salisbury High (continuation) Public 104 +21%
Phoenix Charter Academy Public 19
Stellar Charter Public 239 -14%
Redding Collegiate Academy Public 229 +343%

UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →

Is your school winning the families it should?

An Enrollment Trend Audit benchmarks your enrollment against nearby schools, shows who's gaining and losing families, and lays out a plan to make families choose you — built around the outcomes your families value. Built for principals, heads of school, and district leaders.

Request an Enrollment Trend Audit →