Teach Tech Charter High School
Los Angeles · Los Angeles County · Los Angeles Unified · Public
📄 Shareable scorecard →📋 At a glance
- Program details not reported to CRDC
- Academic signals not yet ingested for this school
Composed from federal CRDC offerings, EDFacts ACGR, and other public data. Full breakdowns below.
How Teach Tech Charter High School compares for families
Mid-pack college outcomes within California.
- ▸ Statewide21.9% UC Reach — right around the California median of 18.1%.
- ▸ vs Similar SchoolsBeats the peer median (21.9% UC Reach vs 14.9% median) across the 5 most similar nearby schools.
Teach Tech Charter High School sent 127 applications to the six most selective University of California campuses and 16.5% were admitted, producing a UC Reach of 21.9% — 3.8 percentage points above the California median of 18.1%, higher than 60% of California high schools..
+7.0 pp above peer median (14.9%) · Ranked #2 of 4 similar schools
18.1%
51.2%
21.9%
Higher than 60% of California high schools (978 ranked, ≥50 seniors)
Teach Tech Charter High School's UC Reach of 21.9% is above the California median (18.1%). The top 10% of CA schools achieve 51.2% or higher.
For context, the elite tier (top 1%) clears 97.3% — a gap of 75 pp from where this school sits.
Overall, Teach Tech Charter High School's UC Reach is higher than 60% of California high schools (978 ranked).
UC funnel — which kids are getting in at what GPA
Combining the school's applicant pool GPA, admit pool GPA, actual admit rate, and statewide CA admit rates by individual GPA band, we can read which GPA tiers tend to get in — and which don't.
| Campus | 4.00+ GPA | 3.70–3.99 GPA | 3.30–3.69 GPA | < 3.30 GPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UC San Diego | Strong shot | Moderate | Long odds | Filtered out |
| UC Santa Barbara | Strong shot | Real shot | Long odds | Filtered out |
The numbers behind it
| Campus | Applicant GPA | Admit GPA | Lift ⓘ | Admit rate | vs peer schools @ same GPA ⓘ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UC San Diego | 3.85 | 4.13 | +0.28 | 57.7% | Peers +0.34 · wider |
| UC Santa Barbara | 3.77 | 4.13 | +0.36 | 42.9% | Peers +0.36 · matches |
📊 Statewide CA admit rates by individual GPA band, 2025 (for reference)
| GPA band | UCB | UCLA | UCSD | UCSB | UCI | UCD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4.00+ | 17.0% | 15.1% | 45.2% | 62.3% | 46.3% | 65.9% |
| 3.70–3.99 | 3.1% | 1.6% | 9.3% | 17.6% | 17.0% | 31.1% |
| 3.30–3.69 | 0.8% | 0.5% | 1.5% | 2.8% | 2.4% | 10.3% |
| 3.00–3.29 | 0.4% | 0.3% | 0.2% | 0.4% | 0.3% | 1.9% |
| < 3.00 | 0.7% | 0.4% | 0.3% | 0.2% | 0.1% | 0.7% |
UC Outcomes Trend — 2018–2025
Class size from CDE grade 12 enrollment. Campus-level data — applicant/admit totals may count a student at multiple campuses more than once.
Campus Breakdown — 2025
| Campus | Applicants | Admits | Enrollees | Admit Rate | UC Reach | Yield | Avg GPA (App) | Avg GPA (Adm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UC Berkeley → Elite | 15 | —† | —† | —† | —† | — | 3.81 | —† |
| UCLA → Elite | 38 | —† | —† | —† | —† | — | 3.77 | —† |
| UC San Diego → Selective | 26 | 15 | —† | 57.7% | 15.6% | — | 3.85 | 4.13 |
| UC Santa Barbara → Selective | 14 | 6 | —† | 42.9% | 6.2% | — | 3.77 | 4.13 |
| UC Irvine → Selective | 29 | —† | —† | —† | —† | — | 3.71 | —† |
| UC Davis → | 5 | —† | —† | —† | —† | — | 3.61 | —† |
SBAC academic outcomes — grade 11, 2025
Share of grade-11 students meeting or exceeding the California standard on Smarter Balanced ELA and Math. This is the academic-readiness signal that pairs with UC Reach (post-grad outcomes), stability (retention), and absenteeism (engagement). Note: statewide median Math is only ~20% — a school at 20% isn't an outlier; one at 45%+ genuinely is.
Source: California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) Smarter Balanced research files. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥30 tested students.
Student composition — 2025-26
HS grades 9–12 racial/ethnic composition and program subgroups, from CDE Census Day Enrollment. Two-year shift shown when ≥1 pt — surfaces how the community served has changed since 2023-24.
Race / ethnicity
Program subgroups
Source: California Department of Education, Census Day Enrollment 2025-26 (HS grades 9–12). Δ shown when shift is ≥1 pt since 2023-24. Categories below 0.5% omitted.
Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25
Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: grades 9–12.
Absenteeism is up 26.9 pp since 2016-17. A rising absenteeism trend often precedes formal departure — worth investigating which subgroups are driving it.
Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).
Enrollment trend & projection
If this trend holds (+2.6%/yr, Total enrollment)
At per-pupil funding of $ / student:
| Horizon | Projected Total enrollment | Change | Funding impact / yr |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 yr (2027) | ~354 | +9 | $0 |
| 3 yr (2029) | ~372 | +27 | $0 |
| 5 yr (2031) | ~391 | +46 | $0 |
Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.
Teach Tech Charter High School — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot
Public · Los Angeles · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools
- ▸On UC Reach, Teach Tech Charter High School sits near the top of its similar-school group (ranked #2 of 4): 22% vs. a peer median of 15%.
- ▸Its UC Reach has risen 14 points since 2018.
- ▸Senior-class enrollment is up 122% (36→80 from 2018 to 2026), outpacing the peer-group median of -32%.
- ▸Enrollment has been growing (+2.6%/yr); projects to ~372 by 2029.
Enrollment projection
Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools
| School | Type | Size | UC Reach | Enroll. trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Teach Tech Charter High School | Public | 345 | 21.9% | +122% |
| Peer-group median | 14.9% | -32% | ||
| Animo City Of Champions Charter High | Public | 306 | — | -50% |
| Alliance Piera Barbaglia Shaheen Health Services Academy | Public | 395 | — | +18% |
| Barack Obama Global Preparation Academy | Public | 354 | — | — |
| Middle College High School | Public | 369 | 38.0% | +1% |
| Ednovate - South La College Prep | Public | 413 | — | -32% |
| Icef View Park Preparatory High | Public | 319 | 3.7% | -42% |
| City Honors International Preparatory High | Public | 284 | — | -12% |
| Morningside High School | Public | 454 | 14.9% | -37% |
| New Opportunities Charter | Public | 439 | — | -49% |
| Environmental Charter High - Gardena | Public | 446 | — | -13% |
UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →
Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25
Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the Los Angeles County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.
Enrollment growth is beating Los Angeles County (+122.2% vs. -8.2%), but 81 of 429 students didn't maintain continuous enrollment. Why are families leaving once enrolled? Chronic absenteeism is also at 43.6% (up +26.9 pts from 2016-17) — engagement and demand are both signaling decline.
81 of 429 students who enrolled at Teach Tech Charter High School this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (18.9% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.
Stability by student group
Nearest peer high schools
Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.
District financial profile — Los Angeles Unified (FY2020)
From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.
Local: 29.8%
Federal: 18.5%
Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the Los Angeles Unified as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).