Icef View Park Preparatory High
· Los Angeles County · Los Angeles Unified · Public
📄 Shareable scorecard →📋 At a glance
- Program details not reported to CRDC
- Academic signals not yet ingested for this school
Composed from federal CRDC offerings, EDFacts ACGR, and other public data. Full breakdowns below.
How Icef View Park Preparatory High compares for families
Real college outcomes data available below.
- ▸ Statewide3.7% UC Reach — 14.3 points below the California median of 18.0%.
- ▸ vs Similar SchoolsTrails the peer median (3.7% UC Reach vs 26.5% median) across the 5 most similar nearby schools.
Icef View Park Preparatory High sent 27 applications to the six most selective University of California campuses and 11.1% were admitted, producing a UC Reach of 3.7% — 14.3 percentage points below the California median of 18.0%, higher than 3% of California high schools..
-22.8 pp vs. peer median (26.5%) · Ranked #3 of 3 similar schools
18.0%
26.5%
49.0%
3.7%
Higher than 3% of California high schools (978 ranked, ≥50 seniors)
Icef View Park Preparatory High's UC Reach of 3.7% is below the California median (18.0%). The top 10% of CA schools achieve 49.0% or higher.
Against similar schools, Icef View Park Preparatory High trails the peer-group median (26.5%) — even though it looks strong vs. the state average.
Overall, Icef View Park Preparatory High's UC Reach is higher than 3% of California high schools (978 ranked).
Campus Breakdown — 2024
| Campus | Applicants | Admits | Enrollees | Admit Rate | UC Reach | Yield | Avg GPA (App) | Avg GPA (Adm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UC Berkeley → Elite | 5 | —† | —† | —† | —† | — | — | —† |
| UCLA → Elite | 8 | —† | —† | —† | —† | — | — | —† |
| UC San Diego → Selective | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| UC Santa Barbara → Selective | 7 | 3 | —† | 42.9% | 3.7% | — | — | —† |
| UC Irvine → Selective | 7 | —† | —† | —† | —† | — | — | —† |
| UC Davis → | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
SBAC academic outcomes — grade 11, 2025
Share of grade-11 students meeting or exceeding the California standard on Smarter Balanced ELA and Math. This is the academic-readiness signal that pairs with UC Reach (post-grad outcomes), stability (retention), and absenteeism (engagement). Note: statewide median Math is only ~20% — a school at 20% isn't an outlier; one at 45%+ genuinely is.
Source: California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) Smarter Balanced research files. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥30 tested students.
Student composition — 2025-26
HS grades 9–12 racial/ethnic composition and program subgroups, from CDE Census Day Enrollment. Two-year shift shown when ≥1 pt — surfaces how the community served has changed since 2023-24.
Race / ethnicity
Program subgroups
Source: California Department of Education, Census Day Enrollment 2025-26 (HS grades 9–12). Δ shown when shift is ≥1 pt since 2023-24. Categories below 0.5% omitted.
Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25
Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: grades 9–12.
Absenteeism is in the typical CA HS range. Worth monitoring alongside the demand and retention signals above.
Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).
Enrollment trend & projection
If this trend holds (-7.7%/yr, Total enrollment)
At per-pupil funding of $ / student:
| Horizon | Projected Total enrollment | Change | Funding impact / yr |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 yr (2027) | ~294 | -25 | $0 |
| 3 yr (2029) | ~251 | -68 | $0 |
| 5 yr (2031) | ~214 | -105 | $0 |
Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.
Icef View Park Preparatory High — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot
Public · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools
- ▸On UC Reach, Icef View Park Preparatory High sits near the bottom of its similar-school group (ranked #3 of 3): 4% vs. a peer median of 26%.
- ▸Senior-class enrollment is down 42% (149→86 from 2018 to 2026), trailing the peer-group median of -20%.
- ▸At its recent rate (-7.7%/yr), enrollment projects to ~251 by 2029 — about 68 fewer students than today.
Enrollment projection
That's about 68 fewer students. At per-student funding of $ per student, that's roughly $0 in annual state funding at risk.
Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423 per ADA) — adjust to your district's actual per-pupil figure. Projection extrapolates the recent annual rate — not a forecast of intent.
Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools
| School | Type | Size | UC Reach | Enroll. trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Icef View Park Preparatory High | Public | 319 | 3.7% | -42% |
| Peer-group median | 26.5% | -20% | ||
| Animo City Of Champions Charter High | Public | 306 | — | -50% |
| Barack Obama Global Preparation Academy | Public | 354 | — | — |
| City Honors International Preparatory High | Public | 284 | — | -12% |
| Teach Tech Charter High School | Public | 345 | 21.9% | +122% |
| Joseph Pomeroy Widney Career Preparatory And Transition Center | Public | 272 | — | -20% |
| Alliance Piera Barbaglia Shaheen Health Services Academy | Public | 395 | — | +18% |
| Matrix For Success Academy | Public | 265 | — | +780% |
| Early College Academy-La Trade Tech College | Public | 262 | 31.2% | -27% |
| New Opportunities Charter | Public | 439 | — | -49% |
| Ednovate - South La College Prep | Public | 413 | — | -32% |
UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →
Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25
Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the Los Angeles County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.
Enrollment -42.3% vs. county -8.2% AND stability (84.5%) below the county median. Recruitment and retention both under pressure — likely a foundational rather than tactical problem.
53 of 341 students who enrolled at Icef View Park Preparatory High this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (15.5% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.
Stability by student group
Nearest peer high schools
Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.
District financial profile — Los Angeles Unified (FY2020)
From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.
Local: 29.8%
Federal: 18.5%
Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the Los Angeles Unified as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).