Sierra High (continuation)
📄 Shareable scorecard →Compare with peers
Most similar nearby schools
Cedar Continuation High → Coulterville High → Raymond Granite High → Mountain High → South Fork High → Compare all similar →No UC admissions data on file for Sierra High (continuation).
This school doesn't appear in UCOP's source-school records (it may send few or no applicants to UC). Its enrollment trend and similar-school comparison are still below.
Enrollment trend & projection
If this trend holds (+2.3%/yr, Total enrollment)
At per-pupil funding of $ / student:
| Horizon | Projected Total enrollment | Change | Funding impact / yr |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 yr (2027) | ~6 | +0 | $0 |
| 3 yr (2029) | ~6 | +0 | $0 |
| 5 yr (2031) | ~7 | +1 | $0 |
Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.
Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25
Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the Mono County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.
Enrollment growth is beating Mono County (+0.0% vs. -42.4%), but 10 of 13 students didn't maintain continuous enrollment. Why are families leaving once enrolled? Chronic absenteeism is also at 92.3% (up +18.6 pts from 2016-17) — engagement and demand are both signaling decline.
10 of 13 students who enrolled at Sierra High (continuation) this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (76.9% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.
Nearest peer high schools
Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.
Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25
Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: grades 9–12.
Absenteeism is up 18.6 pp since 2016-17. A rising absenteeism trend often precedes formal departure — worth investigating which subgroups are driving it.
Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).
Student composition — 2025-26
HS grades 9–12 racial/ethnic composition and program subgroups, from CDE Census Day Enrollment. Two-year shift shown when ≥1 pt — surfaces how the community served has changed since 2023-24.
Race / ethnicity
Program subgroups
Source: California Department of Education, Census Day Enrollment 2025-26 (HS grades 9–12). Δ shown when shift is ≥1 pt since 2023-24. Categories below 0.5% omitted.
District financial profile — Mammoth Unified (FY2020)
From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.
Local: 77.7%
Federal: 7.4%
Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the Mammoth Unified as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).
Sierra High (continuation) — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot
Public · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools
- ▸Senior-class enrollment is up 0% (2→2 from 2018 to 2026), tracking the peer-group median of +0%.
Enrollment projection
Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools
| School | Type | Size | UC Reach | Enroll. trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sierra High (continuation) | Public | 6 | — | +0% |
| Peer-group median | — | +0% | ||
| Cedar Continuation High | Public | 5 | — | -86% |
| Coulterville High | Public | 5 | — | -67% |
| Raymond Granite High | Public | 4 | — | -50% |
| Mountain High | Public | 4 | — | +0% |
| South Fork High | Public | 4 | — | +0% |
| Long Barn High | Public | 10 | — | +33% |
| Cold Springs High | Public | 3 | — | +0% |
| Keith B. Bright High (juvenile Hall) | Public | 2 | — | — |
| Sierra Alternative High | Public | 15 | — | -25% |
| Yosemite Park High | Public | 2 | — | +0% |
UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →