No UC admissions data on file for Mountain High.

This school doesn't appear in UCOP's source-school records (it may send few or no applicants to UC). Its enrollment trend and similar-school comparison are still below.

Mountain High

· Tuolumne County · Summerville Union High · Public

Public Tuolumne County 🏛 Summerville Union High → CDS 5572413…
📄 Shareable scorecard →

📋 At a glance

Programs & features
Academic signals
  • 🎓 AP rigor: Bottom 14% of US high schools

Composed from federal CRDC offerings, EDFacts ACGR, and other public data. Full breakdowns below.

💡

How Mountain High compares for families

What families should know about Mountain High.

  • vs Similar SchoolsThe closest comparables nearby: South Fork High, Cold Springs High, Long Barn High and 2 more. See the sidebar to compare side-by-side.

SAT / ACT participation

CRDC federal data · 2020-21
SAT/ACT test-takers
0
11th-12th graders who took 1+ college admissions test
Test-taking intensity
0.0
takers per 100 students in grades 9-12

Source: federal Civil Rights Data Collection (CRDC 2020-21). Volume — not score — is what's reported here. A higher count means more students at this school are entering the college admissions pipeline. Note: 2020-21 was COVID-disrupted; some districts (especially those that stayed remote longer) report unusually low or zero takers.

🏛️ Federal Title I context

Lower-need school

Not Title I eligible (FRPL < 25%)

-100.0%
FRPL rate — % of students who qualify for the federal Free or Reduced-Price Lunch program. This is the underlying federal income-eligibility signal Title I designations are computed from (ESEA Sec. 1113).
0% (no FRPL) 35% TA · 40% Schoolwide 100% (universal FRPL)

<25% of students qualify for free/reduced lunch. Well below the Title I threshold; expect a higher-income student body on average.

Source: NCES Common Core of Data, free/reduced-price lunch eligibility. The actual Title I designation is a district decision and may differ from eligibility — but the federal eligibility math is what we show here. We don't claim to assert whether the district formally chose to enroll this school in Title I.

Student composition — 2025-26

HS grades 9–12 racial/ethnic composition and program subgroups, from CDE Census Day Enrollment. Two-year shift shown when ≥1 pt — surfaces how the community served has changed since 2023-24.

Race / ethnicity

Hispanic / Latino 50%
White 25%
Two or more 25% -75.0

Program subgroups

Source: California Department of Education, Census Day Enrollment 2025-26 (HS grades 9–12). Δ shown when shift is ≥1 pt since 2023-24. Categories below 0.5% omitted.

Chronic absenteeism — 2020-21

Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: grades 9–12.

Chronic absent
57.1%
8 of 14 students

Roughly one in three students is chronically absent. A floor this high signals systemic engagement problems beyond what any single intervention can fix.

Tuolumne County median
17.5% · school is worse than 80% of 5 HS
Statewide median
13.3%

Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2020-21. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).

Enrollment trend & projection

Total enrollment (9–12)
3 (2018)4 (2026)
+33.3%
Grade 12 (graduating class)
1 (2018)1 (2022)
+0.0%

If this trend holds (+3.7%/yr, Total enrollment)

At per-pupil funding of $ / student:

Horizon Projected Total enrollment Change Funding impact / yr
1 yr (2027) ~4 +0 $0
3 yr (2029) ~4 +0 $0
5 yr (2031) ~5 +1 $0

Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.

Mountain High — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot

Public · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools

  • Senior-class enrollment is up 0% (1→1 from 2018 to 2022), tracking the peer-group median of +0%.

Enrollment projection

4 students (2026)
~4 projected (2029)
at +3.7%/yr

Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools

School Type Size UC Reach Enroll. trend
Mountain High Public 4 +0%
Peer-group median +0%
South Fork High Public 4 +0%
Cold Springs High Public 3 +0%
Long Barn High Public 10 +33%
Coulterville High Public 5 -67%
Sentinel High Public 4 -88%
Alpine County Opportunity Public 5
Yosemite Park High Public 2 +0%
Vista High (continuation) Public 16 -25%
Dickens (billy Joe) High (continuation) Public 17 -43%
Pride Continuation Public 18 +7%

UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →

Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25

Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the Tuolumne County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.

Mixed signal
Demand outpacing county is masking internal churn.

Enrollment growth is beating Tuolumne County (+0.0% vs. -14.2%), but 4 of 6 students didn't maintain continuous enrollment. Why are families leaving once enrolled? Chronic absenteeism is also at 53.3% (up -3.8 pts from 2020-21) — engagement and demand are both signaling decline.

+0.0%  school enrollment (2018–2022)
-14.2%  Tuolumne County baseline
+14.2pp  gap vs. county
33.3%  retention (county median 76.8%)
Enrollment — indexed to 100 at 2018
Stability rate by year (raw %)
Stability rate
33.3%
2 of 6 students

4 of 6 students who enrolled at Mountain High this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (66.7% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.

Tuolumne County median
76.8% · school is in the 25th percentile of 4 HS
Statewide median
87.2% · in the 9th percentile of 1,688 HS

Nearest peer high schools

South Fork High 33.3% Cold Springs High 20.0% Long Barn High 58.3% Coulterville High 44.4% Sentinel High 44.4%

Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.

District financial profile — Summerville Union High (FY2020)

From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.

Total revenue
$14.3M
-13.3% since FY2017
Per-pupil revenue
$22,670
631 students enrolled
Revenue mix
State: 48.0%
Local: 46.3%
Federal: 5.7%
Instruction share
52.5%
of current spending · $8,022/pupil
Long-term debt
$16.3M
0.0% since FY2017
Total revenue by year ($M)
Total expenditure by year ($M)

Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the Summerville Union High as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).

Researching colleges for your kid at Mountain High?

Get a personalized College Plan Audit — find Reach, Target, and Safety colleges matched to your kid's GPA, test scores, intended major, and your family's budget. Free.

Start the College Plan Audit →

For school leaders looking at enrollment trends: request an Enrollment Trend Audit →