Keith B. Bright High (juvenile Hall)

· Inyo County · Bishop Unified
Public Inyo County 🏛 Bishop Unified → CDS 1476687…
📄 Shareable scorecard →

Compare with peers

Most similar nearby schools

Cds Bishop High → Yosemite Park High → Raymond Granite High → Cedar Continuation High → Sierra High (continuation) → Compare all similar →

No UC admissions data on file for Keith B. Bright High (juvenile Hall).

This school doesn't appear in UCOP's source-school records (it may send few or no applicants to UC). Its enrollment trend and similar-school comparison are still below.

Enrollment trend & projection

Total enrollment
4 (2018)2 (2026)
-50.0%

If this trend holds (-8.3%/yr, Total enrollment)

At per-pupil funding of $ / student:

Horizon Projected Total enrollment Change Funding impact / yr
1 yr (2027) ~2 +0 $0
3 yr (2029) ~2 +0 $0
5 yr (2031) ~1 -1 $0

Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.

Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25

Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the Inyo County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.

Stability rate
25.0%
2 of 8 students

6 of 8 students who enrolled at Keith B. Bright High (juvenile Hall) this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (75.0% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.

Inyo County median
58.4% · school is in the 0th percentile of 2 HS
Statewide median
87.2% · in the 3rd percentile of 1,688 HS

Nearest peer high schools

Cds Bishop High 20.0% Yosemite Park High 33.3% Raymond Granite High 12.5% Cedar Continuation High 53.8% Sierra High (continuation) 23.1%

Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.

Chronic absenteeism — 2018-19

Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: grades 9–12.

Chronic absent
100.0%
7 of 7 students

Roughly one in three students is chronically absent. A floor this high signals systemic engagement problems beyond what any single intervention can fix.

Inyo County median
49.8% · school is worse than 100% of 2 HS
Statewide median
14.6%

Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2018-19. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).

Student composition — 2025-26

HS grades 9–12 racial/ethnic composition and program subgroups, from CDE Census Day Enrollment. Two-year shift shown when ≥1 pt — surfaces how the community served has changed since 2023-24.

Race / ethnicity

American Indian 100%

Program subgroups

Source: California Department of Education, Census Day Enrollment 2025-26 (HS grades 9–12). Δ shown when shift is ≥1 pt since 2023-24. Categories below 0.5% omitted.

District financial profile — Bishop Unified (FY2020)

From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.

Total revenue
$29.6M
+26.1% since FY2017
Per-pupil revenue
$15,034
1,969 students enrolled
Revenue mix
State: 33.3%
Local: 51.3%
Federal: 15.4%
Instruction share
60.3%
of current spending · $8,658/pupil
Long-term debt
$5.1M
-23.8% since FY2017
Total revenue by year ($M)
Total expenditure by year ($M)

Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the Bishop Unified as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).

Keith B. Bright High (juvenile Hall) — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot

Public · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools

  • We don't yet have enough UC-outcome or enrollment history for Keith B. Bright High (juvenile Hall) to build a full trend — but its similar-school comparison is below.

Enrollment projection

2 students (2026)
~2 projected (2029)
at -8.3%/yr

Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools

School Type Size UC Reach Enroll. trend
Keith B. Bright High (juvenile Hall) Public 2
Peer-group median -48%
Cds Bishop High Public 1 -75%
Yosemite Park High Public 2 +0%
Raymond Granite High Public 4 -50%
Cedar Continuation High Public 5 -86%
Sierra High (continuation) Public 6 +0%
Palisade Glacier High (continuation) Public 20 -47%
Big Pine High Public 27 -64%
Esperanza High Public 12 -50%
Sierra Alternative High Public 15 -25%
Mountain Oaks High Public 17 -29%

UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →

Is your school winning the families it should?

An Enrollment Trend Audit benchmarks your enrollment against nearby schools, shows who's gaining and losing families, and lays out a plan to make families choose you — built around the outcomes your families value. Built for principals, heads of school, and district leaders.

Request an Enrollment Trend Audit →