Rio Linda High

· Sacramento County · Twin Rivers Unified
Public Sacramento County 🏛 Twin Rivers Unified → CDS 3476505…
📄 Shareable scorecard →

Compare with peers

Most similar nearby schools

Rio Linda Senior High School → Mira Loma High School → Antelope High School → Westlake Charter → Foothill High → Compare all similar →

No UC admissions data on file for Rio Linda High.

This school doesn't appear in UCOP's source-school records (it may send few or no applicants to UC). Its enrollment trend and similar-school comparison are still below.

Enrollment trend & projection

Total enrollment (9–12)
1,659 (2018)1,641 (2026)
-1.1%
Grade 12 (graduating class)
376 (2018)372 (2026)
-1.1%

If this trend holds (-0.1%/yr, Total enrollment)

At per-pupil funding of $ / student:

Horizon Projected Total enrollment Change Funding impact / yr
1 yr (2027) ~1,639 -2 $0
3 yr (2029) ~1,634 -7 $0
5 yr (2031) ~1,630 -11 $0

Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.

Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25

Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the Sacramento County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.

Action needed
Demand declining faster than county; retention only average.

Enrollment is shrinking faster than Sacramento County (school -1.1% vs. county +3.0%) with stability (80.7%) near the county median. Two problems compounding — the recruitment side is the higher-leverage starting point. Chronic absenteeism is also at 35.1% (up +23.2 pts from 2016-17) — engagement and demand are both signaling decline.

-1.1%  school enrollment (2018–2026)
+3.0%  Sacramento County baseline
-4.1pp  gap vs. county
80.7%  retention (county median 80.8%)
Enrollment — indexed to 100 at 2018
Stability rate by year (raw %)
Stability rate
80.7%
1,394 of 1,728 students

334 of 1,728 students who enrolled at Rio Linda High this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (19.3% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.

Sacramento County median
80.8% · school is in the 49th percentile of 77 HS
Statewide median
87.2% · in the 31st percentile of 1,688 HS

Stability by student group

Socio. disadvantaged (1,491) 80.3%
Hispanic / Latino (886) 81.3%
English learners (357) 76.8%
White (317) 84.5%
Students w/ disabilities (255) 80.0%
Asian (242) 86.0%

Nearest peer high schools

Mira Loma High School 84.4% Antelope High School 90.1% Westlake Charter 92.3% Foothill High 77.1%

Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.

Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25

Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: grades 9–12.

Chronic absent
35.1%
584 of 1,664 students

Absenteeism is up 23.2 pp since 2016-17. A rising absenteeism trend often precedes formal departure — worth investigating which subgroups are driving it.

Sacramento County median
25.8% · school is worse than 68% of 75 HS
Statewide median
22.9%
Chronic absenteeism by year (raw %)

Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).

SBAC academic outcomes — grade 11, 2025

Share of grade-11 students meeting or exceeding the California standard on Smarter Balanced ELA and Math. This is the academic-readiness signal that pairs with UC Reach (post-grad outcomes), stability (retention), and absenteeism (engagement). Note: statewide median Math is only ~20% — a school at 20% isn't an outlier; one at 45%+ genuinely is.

ELA — met or exceeded
n = 329
56.5%
incl. 24.9% exceeded
+10.4 pts above Sacramento County median (46.1%) · CA median 54.3% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 79.3%
Math — met or exceeded
n = 329
23.4%
incl. 11.2% exceeded
+5.7 pts above Sacramento County median (17.7%) · CA median 21.1% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 53.6%

Source: California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) Smarter Balanced research files. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥30 tested students.

Student composition — 2025-26

HS grades 9–12 racial/ethnic composition and program subgroups, from CDE Census Day Enrollment. Two-year shift shown when ≥1 pt — surfaces how the community served has changed since 2023-24.

Race / ethnicity

Hispanic / Latino 51% +1.0
White 19%
Asian 14%
Black / African Am. 7%
Two or more 4%
Not reported 2%
Pacific Islander 1%
Filipino 1%
American Indian 0%

Program subgroups

Students w/ disabilities 67% -15.3
English learners 18% -1.9
Socioeconomically disadv. 14%
Homeless 3% -2.4

Source: California Department of Education, Census Day Enrollment 2025-26 (HS grades 9–12). Δ shown when shift is ≥1 pt since 2023-24. Categories below 0.5% omitted.

District financial profile — Twin Rivers Unified (FY2020)

From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.

Total revenue
$536.8M
+15.0% since FY2017
Per-pupil revenue
$21,914
24,497 students enrolled
Revenue mix
State: 61.8%
Local: 18.8%
Federal: 19.4%
Instruction share
56.3%
of current spending · $9,076/pupil
Long-term debt
$362.4M
0.0% since FY2017
Total revenue by year ($M)
Total expenditure by year ($M)

Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the Twin Rivers Unified as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).

Rio Linda High — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot

Public · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools

  • Senior-class enrollment is down 1% (376→372 from 2018 to 2026), trailing the peer-group median of +2%.
  • At its recent rate (-0.1%/yr), enrollment projects to ~1634 by 2029 — about 7 fewer students than today.

Enrollment projection

1641 students (2026)
~1634 projected (2029)
at -0.1%/yr

That's about 7 fewer students. At per-student funding of $ per student, that's roughly $0 in annual state funding at risk.

Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423 per ADA) — adjust to your district's actual per-pupil figure. Projection extrapolates the recent annual rate — not a forecast of intent.

Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools

School Type Size UC Reach Enroll. trend
Rio Linda High Public 1641 -1%
Peer-group median 12.8% +2%
Rio Linda Senior High School Public 1641 9.4% +1%
Mira Loma High School Public 1679 45.4% -5%
Antelope High School Public 1781 14.3% +1%
Westlake Charter Public 1492 38.1% -17%
Foothill High Public 1432 11.2% +34%
Natomas Charter Public 1899 39.6% +17%
Del Campo High School Public 1531 7.7% -4%
Grant Union High Public 2124 15.7% +20%
Center High School Public 1257 8.8% +3%
Hiram W Johnson High School Public 1637 8.3% +18%

UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →

Is your school winning the families it should?

An Enrollment Trend Audit benchmarks your enrollment against nearby schools, shows who's gaining and losing families, and lays out a plan to make families choose you — built around the outcomes your families value. Built for principals, heads of school, and district leaders.

Request an Enrollment Trend Audit →