Compare with peers
Most similar nearby schools
Del Campo High School → Center High School → Antelope High School → Roseville High School → Mira Loma High School → Compare all similar →📋 At a glance
- 📚 11 AP courses offered — Elite
- ✅ Dual-enrollment program (college credit while in HS)
- ✅ Gifted & talented program
- 🔢 2 calculus classes · 6 physics · 24 chemistry
- 🎓 AP rigor: 86th percentile nationally
- 🎓 4-yr grad rate: 94% (69th percentile nationally)
Composed from federal CRDC offerings, EDFacts ACGR, and other public data. Full breakdowns below.
How Foothill High compares for families
Real college outcomes data available below.
- ▸ Statewide11.2% UC Reach — 6.9 points below the California median of 18.1%.
- ▸ vs Similar SchoolsRight at the peer median (13.3% UC Reach) across the 5 most similar nearby schools.
🎓 Academic rigor
AP + advanced-course offerings
Elite — exceptional AP + advanced course breadth
86th percentile nationally
✅ Gifted/talented program
Source: federal Civil Rights Data Collection (CRDC 2020-21). CRDC reports what's offered + enrolled — it doesn't collect AP exam pass rates (College Board owns that data and doesn't release it school-level).
SAT / ACT participation
CRDC federal data · 2020-21Source: federal Civil Rights Data Collection (CRDC 2020-21). Volume — not score — is what's reported here. A higher count means more students at this school are entering the college admissions pipeline. Note: 2020-21 was COVID-disrupted; some districts (especially those that stayed remote longer) report unusually low or zero takers.
🎓 4-year graduation rate · federal EDFacts
What % of students graduate on time?
69th percentile nationally
Source: federal EDFacts ACGR (Adjusted Cohort Graduation Rate), 2019 vintage via Urban Institute. EDFacts publishes a range (low-high) to preserve privacy on small cohorts; we display the midpoint.
🏛️ Federal Title I context
High-poverty school
Title I Schoolwide eligible
≥75% of students qualify for free/reduced lunch. These schools qualify for the highest tier of federal Title I funding and typically receive extra wraparound services. Academic outcomes vary widely — check the state assessment + grad-rate tiles.
Source: NCES Common Core of Data, free/reduced-price lunch eligibility. The actual Title I designation is a district decision and may differ from eligibility — but the federal eligibility math is what we show here. We don't claim to assert whether the district formally chose to enroll this school in Title I.
Foothill High sent 178 applications to the six most selective University of California campuses and 20.2% were admitted, producing a UC Reach of 11.2% — 6.9 percentage points below the California median of 18.1%, higher than 23% of California high schools..
-2.1 pp vs. peer median (13.3%) · Ranked #6 of 10 similar schools
18.1%
13.3%
51.2%
11.2%
Higher than 23% of California high schools (978 ranked, ≥50 seniors)
Foothill High's UC Reach of 11.2% is below the California median (18.1%). The top 10% of CA schools achieve 51.2% or higher.
Overall, Foothill High's UC Reach is higher than 23% of California high schools (978 ranked).
UC funnel — which kids are getting in at what GPA
Combining the school's applicant pool GPA, admit pool GPA, actual admit rate, and statewide CA admit rates by individual GPA band, we can read which GPA tiers tend to get in — and which don't.
| Campus | 4.00+ GPA | 3.70–3.99 GPA | 3.30–3.69 GPA | < 3.30 GPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UC San Diego | Strong shot | Moderate | Long odds | Filtered out |
| UC Santa Barbara | Strong shot | Real shot | Long odds | Filtered out |
| UC Davis | Strong shot | Strong shot | Real shot | Filtered out |
The numbers behind it
| Campus | Applicant GPA | Admit GPA | Lift ⓘ | Admit rate | vs peer schools @ same GPA ⓘ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UC San Diego | 3.66 | 4.12 | +0.46 | 31.0% | Peers +0.43 · matches |
| UC Santa Barbara | 3.75 | 3.95 | +0.20 | 66.7% | Peers +0.36 · wider |
| UC Davis | 3.64 | 3.95 | +0.31 | 39.6% | Peers +0.38 · wider |
📊 Statewide CA admit rates by individual GPA band, 2025 (for reference)
| GPA band | UCB | UCLA | UCSD | UCSB | UCI | UCD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4.00+ | 17.0% | 15.1% | 45.2% | 62.3% | 46.3% | 65.9% |
| 3.70–3.99 | 3.1% | 1.6% | 9.3% | 17.6% | 17.0% | 31.1% |
| 3.30–3.69 | 0.8% | 0.5% | 1.5% | 2.8% | 2.4% | 10.3% |
| 3.00–3.29 | 0.4% | 0.3% | 0.2% | 0.4% | 0.3% | 1.9% |
| < 3.00 | 0.7% | 0.4% | 0.3% | 0.2% | 0.1% | 0.7% |
Where Foothill High sits vs. all California schools ⓘ
Overall, this school admits its UC applicants 8.7 points above what their GPAs predict (39.6% actual vs. 30.8% expected).
UC Outcomes Trend — 2018–2025
Class size from CDE grade 12 enrollment. Campus-level data — applicant/admit totals may count a student at multiple campuses more than once.
Campus Breakdown — 2025
| Campus | Applicants | Admits | Enrollees | Admit Rate | UC Reach | Yield | Avg GPA (App) | Avg GPA (Adm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UC Berkeley → Elite | 32 | —† | —† | —† | —† | — | 3.64 | —† |
| UCLA → Elite | 39 | —† | —† | —† | —† | — | 3.66 | —† |
| UC San Diego → Selective | 29 | 9 | —† | 31.0% | 2.8% | — | 3.66 | 4.12 |
| UC Santa Barbara → Selective | 9 | 6 | —† | 66.7% | 1.9% | — | 3.75 | 3.95 |
| UC Irvine → Selective | 16 | —† | —† | —† | —† | — | 3.82 | —† |
| UC Davis → | 53 | 21 | 10 | 39.6% | 6.5% | 47.6% | 3.64 | 3.95 |
SBAC academic outcomes — grade 11, 2025
Share of grade-11 students meeting or exceeding the California standard on Smarter Balanced ELA and Math. This is the academic-readiness signal that pairs with UC Reach (post-grad outcomes), stability (retention), and absenteeism (engagement). Note: statewide median Math is only ~20% — a school at 20% isn't an outlier; one at 45%+ genuinely is.
Source: California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) Smarter Balanced research files. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥30 tested students.
Student composition — 2025-26
HS grades 9–12 racial/ethnic composition and program subgroups, from CDE Census Day Enrollment. Two-year shift shown when ≥1 pt — surfaces how the community served has changed since 2023-24.
Race / ethnicity
Program subgroups
Source: California Department of Education, Census Day Enrollment 2025-26 (HS grades 9–12). Δ shown when shift is ≥1 pt since 2023-24. Categories below 0.5% omitted.
Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25
Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: grades 9–12.
Absenteeism is up 19.2 pp since 2016-17. A rising absenteeism trend often precedes formal departure — worth investigating which subgroups are driving it.
Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).
Enrollment trend & projection
If this trend holds (+2.9%/yr, Total enrollment)
At per-pupil funding of $ / student:
| Horizon | Projected Total enrollment | Change | Funding impact / yr |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 yr (2027) | ~1,473 | +41 | $0 |
| 3 yr (2029) | ~1,558 | +126 | $0 |
| 5 yr (2031) | ~1,649 | +217 | $0 |
Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.
Foothill High — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot
Public · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools
- ▸On UC Reach, Foothill High sits in the middle of its similar-school group (ranked #6 of 10): 11% vs. a peer median of 13%.
- ▸Its UC Reach has slipped 4 points since 2018 — worth watching.
- ▸Across the top-6 UC campuses, Foothill High is admitting at roughly +9 percentage points above what its average applicant GPA (3.659) alone would predict (40% actual vs. 31% expected). That's a meaningful signal — it can reflect UC's track record with this school's graduates, students presenting strongly in UC's holistic review (essays, EC's, context), or institutional familiarity helping at the margin. The data can't distinguish which, but the pattern itself is real and worth understanding.
- ▸Senior-class enrollment is up 34% (229→306 from 2018 to 2026), outpacing the peer-group median of -2%.
- ▸Enrollment has been growing (+2.9%/yr); projects to ~1558 by 2029.
Enrollment projection
Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools
| School | Type | Size | UC Reach | Enroll. trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Foothill High | Public | 1432 | 11.2% | +34% |
| Peer-group median | 13.3% | -2% | ||
| Del Campo High School | Public | 1531 | 7.7% | -4% |
| Center High School | Public | 1257 | 8.8% | +3% |
| Antelope High School | Public | 1781 | 14.3% | +1% |
| Roseville High School | Public | 1458 | 13.3% | -25% |
| Mira Loma High School | Public | 1679 | 45.4% | -5% |
| Rio Linda Senior High School | Public | 1641 | 9.4% | +1% |
| Rio Linda High | Public | 1641 | — | -1% |
| Oakmont High School | Public | 1283 | 15.7% | -30% |
| El Camino Fundamental Hs | Public | 1171 | 14.3% | -6% |
| Rosemont High School | Public | 1426 | 10.0% | +13% |
UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →
Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25
Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the Sacramento County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.
Enrollment growth is beating Sacramento County (+33.6% vs. +3.0%), but 367 of 1603 students didn't maintain continuous enrollment. Why are families leaving once enrolled? Chronic absenteeism is also at 35.4% (up +19.2 pts from 2016-17) — engagement and demand are both signaling decline.
367 of 1,603 students who enrolled at Foothill High this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (22.9% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.
Stability by student group
Nearest peer high schools
Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.
District financial profile — Twin Rivers Unified (FY2020)
From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.
Local: 18.8%
Federal: 19.4%
Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the Twin Rivers Unified as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).