Rancho Vista High

· Riverside County · Temecula Valley Unified
Public Riverside County 🏛 Temecula Valley Unified → CDS 3375192…
📄 Shareable scorecard →

Compare with peers

Most similar nearby schools

Harbor Springs Charter School → All Tribes Charter → Oasis High (alternative) → Murrieta Canyon Academy → Susan H. Nelson High School → Compare all similar →

No UC admissions data on file for Rancho Vista High.

This school doesn't appear in UCOP's source-school records (it may send few or no applicants to UC). Its enrollment trend and similar-school comparison are still below.

Enrollment trend & projection

Total enrollment (9–12)
127 (2018)117 (2026)
-7.9%
Grade 12 (graduating class)
88 (2018)86 (2026)
-2.3%

If this trend holds (-1.0%/yr, Total enrollment)

At per-pupil funding of $ / student:

Horizon Projected Total enrollment Change Funding impact / yr
1 yr (2027) ~116 -1 $0
3 yr (2029) ~113 -4 $0
5 yr (2031) ~111 -6 $0

Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.

Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25

Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the Riverside County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.

Action needed
Mid-year exits eroding share alongside county-wide pressure.

Tracking Riverside County on enrollment (-2.3% vs. -2.7%), but stability (36.0%) is below the county median. Retention is the levered fix. Chronic absenteeism is also at 77.7% (up +9.1 pts from 2016-17) — engagement and demand are both signaling decline.

-2.3%  school enrollment (2018–2026)
-2.7%  Riverside County baseline
+0.4pp  gap vs. county
36.0%  retention (county median 85.4%)
Enrollment — indexed to 100 at 2018
Stability rate by year (raw %)
Stability rate
36.0%
90 of 250 students

160 of 250 students who enrolled at Rancho Vista High this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (64.0% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.

Riverside County median
85.4% · school is in the 13th percentile of 94 HS
Statewide median
87.2% · in the 10th percentile of 1,688 HS

Stability by student group

Socio. disadvantaged (155) 38.1%
Hispanic / Latino (140) 40.0%
Students w/ disabilities (64) 28.1%
White (54) 27.8%
English learners (38) 44.7%

Nearest peer high schools

Harbor Springs Charter School 70.0% All Tribes Charter 98.0% Oasis High (alternative) 55.0% Murrieta Canyon Academy 46.8% Susan H. Nelson High School 47.0%

Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.

Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25

Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: grades 9–12.

Chronic absent
77.7%
185 of 238 students

Absenteeism is up 9.1 pp since 2016-17. A rising absenteeism trend often precedes formal departure — worth investigating which subgroups are driving it.

Riverside County median
28.9% · school is worse than 95% of 94 HS
Statewide median
22.9%
Chronic absenteeism by year (raw %)

Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).

SBAC academic outcomes — grade 11, 2025

Share of grade-11 students meeting or exceeding the California standard on Smarter Balanced ELA and Math. This is the academic-readiness signal that pairs with UC Reach (post-grad outcomes), stability (retention), and absenteeism (engagement). Note: statewide median Math is only ~20% — a school at 20% isn't an outlier; one at 45%+ genuinely is.

ELA — met or exceeded
n = 58
24.1%
incl. 5.2% exceeded
-25.6 pts vs. Riverside County median (49.7%) · CA median 54.3% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 79.3%
Math — met or exceeded
n = 56
1.8%
incl. 0.0% exceeded
-13.9 pts vs. Riverside County median (15.7%) · CA median 21.1% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 53.6%

Source: California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) Smarter Balanced research files. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥30 tested students.

Student composition — 2025-26

HS grades 9–12 racial/ethnic composition and program subgroups, from CDE Census Day Enrollment. Two-year shift shown when ≥1 pt — surfaces how the community served has changed since 2023-24.

Race / ethnicity

Hispanic / Latino 56%
White 20% -1.4
Black / African Am. 10% +2.7
Two or more 5% -3.9
Filipino 4%
American Indian 3% +1.2
Asian 1%
Pacific Islander 1%

Program subgroups

Students w/ disabilities 71% +8.0
Socioeconomically disadv. 22% +8.4

Source: California Department of Education, Census Day Enrollment 2025-26 (HS grades 9–12). Δ shown when shift is ≥1 pt since 2023-24. Categories below 0.5% omitted.

District financial profile — Temecula Valley Unified (FY2020)

From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.

Total revenue
$374.2M
+7.3% since FY2017
Per-pupil revenue
$14,010
26,710 students enrolled
Revenue mix
State: 61.9%
Local: 30.6%
Federal: 7.5%
Instruction share
64.8%
of current spending · $8,081/pupil
Long-term debt
$177.0M
+105.6% since FY2017
Total revenue by year ($M)
Total expenditure by year ($M)

Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the Temecula Valley Unified as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).

Rancho Vista High — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot

Public · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools

  • Senior-class enrollment is down 2% (88→86 from 2018 to 2026), tracking the peer-group median of -2%.
  • At its recent rate (-1.0%/yr), enrollment projects to ~113 by 2029 — about 4 fewer students than today.

Enrollment projection

117 students (2026)
~113 projected (2029)
at -1.0%/yr

That's about 4 fewer students. At per-student funding of $ per student, that's roughly $0 in annual state funding at risk.

Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423 per ADA) — adjust to your district's actual per-pupil figure. Projection extrapolates the recent annual rate — not a forecast of intent.

Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools

School Type Size UC Reach Enroll. trend
Rancho Vista High Public 117 -2%
Peer-group median -2%
Harbor Springs Charter School Public 70 +0%
All Tribes Charter Public 113 -26%
Oasis High (alternative) Public 80 +27%
Murrieta Canyon Academy Public 212 -40%
Susan H. Nelson High School Public 332 +28%
Ivy High (continuation) Public 71 -41%
Mountain Heights Academy Public 105 -41%
Oak Glen High Public 73 +12%
San Jacinto Middle College High Public 136 +2300%
Major General Raymond Murray High Public 143 -4%

UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →

Is your school winning the families it should?

An Enrollment Trend Audit benchmarks your enrollment against nearby schools, shows who's gaining and losing families, and lays out a plan to make families choose you — built around the outcomes your families value. Built for principals, heads of school, and district leaders.

Request an Enrollment Trend Audit →