Oasis High (alternative)

· San Diego County · Fallbrook Union High
Public San Diego County 🏛 Fallbrook Union High → CDS 3768122…
📄 Shareable scorecard →

Compare with peers

Most similar nearby schools

Ivy High (continuation) → Vista Visions Academy → Harbor Springs Charter School → Oak Glen High → Alta Vista High (continuation) → Compare all similar →

No UC admissions data on file for Oasis High (alternative).

This school doesn't appear in UCOP's source-school records (it may send few or no applicants to UC). Its enrollment trend and similar-school comparison are still below.

Enrollment trend & projection

Total enrollment (9–12)
85 (2018)80 (2026)
-5.9%
Grade 12 (graduating class)
30 (2018)38 (2026)
+26.7%

If this trend holds (-0.8%/yr, Total enrollment)

At per-pupil funding of $ / student:

Horizon Projected Total enrollment Change Funding impact / yr
1 yr (2027) ~79 -1 $0
3 yr (2029) ~78 -2 $0
5 yr (2031) ~77 -3 $0

Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.

Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25

Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the San Diego County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.

Mixed signal
Demand outpacing county is masking internal churn.

Enrollment growth is beating San Diego County (+26.7% vs. -7.8%), but 49 of 109 students didn't maintain continuous enrollment. Why are families leaving once enrolled?

+26.7%  school enrollment (2018–2026)
-7.8%  San Diego County baseline
+34.5pp  gap vs. county
55.0%  retention (county median 88.5%)
Enrollment — indexed to 100 at 2018
Stability rate by year (raw %)
Stability rate
55.0%
60 of 109 students

49 of 109 students who enrolled at Oasis High (alternative) this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (45.0% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.

San Diego County median
88.5% · school is in the 17th percentile of 121 HS
Statewide median
87.2% · in the 19th percentile of 1,688 HS

Stability by student group

Socio. disadvantaged (81) 55.6%
Hispanic / Latino (69) 56.5%
White (32) 46.9%

Nearest peer high schools

Ivy High (continuation) 51.9% Vista Visions Academy 45.1% Harbor Springs Charter School 70.0% Oak Glen High 57.0% Alta Vista High (continuation) 51.9%

Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.

Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25

Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: grades 9–12.

Chronic absent
9.7%
10 of 103 students

Absenteeism is up 9.7 pp since 2016-17. A rising absenteeism trend often precedes formal departure — worth investigating which subgroups are driving it.

San Diego County median
18.9% · school is better than 87% of 117 HS
Statewide median
22.9%
Chronic absenteeism by year (raw %)

Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).

SBAC academic outcomes — grade 11, 2025

Share of grade-11 students meeting or exceeding the California standard on Smarter Balanced ELA and Math. This is the academic-readiness signal that pairs with UC Reach (post-grad outcomes), stability (retention), and absenteeism (engagement). Note: statewide median Math is only ~20% — a school at 20% isn't an outlier; one at 45%+ genuinely is.

ELA — met or exceeded
n = 37
62.2%
incl. 21.6% exceeded
+1.6 pts above San Diego County median (60.6%) · CA median 54.3% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 79.3%
Math — met or exceeded
n = 37
16.2%
incl. 2.7% exceeded
-8.2 pts vs. San Diego County median (24.4%) · CA median 21.1% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 53.6%

Source: California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) Smarter Balanced research files. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥30 tested students.

Student composition — 2025-26

HS grades 9–12 racial/ethnic composition and program subgroups, from CDE Census Day Enrollment. Two-year shift shown when ≥1 pt — surfaces how the community served has changed since 2023-24.

Race / ethnicity

Hispanic / Latino 71% +12.0
White 20% -13.8
Not reported 4%
Black / African Am. 2% +1.1
Two or more 2% +1.1

Program subgroups

Students w/ disabilities 66% +35.2

Source: California Department of Education, Census Day Enrollment 2025-26 (HS grades 9–12). Δ shown when shift is ≥1 pt since 2023-24. Categories below 0.5% omitted.

District financial profile — Fallbrook Union High (FY2020)

From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.

Total revenue
$42.0M
+18.5% since FY2017
Per-pupil revenue
$19,467
2,155 students enrolled
Revenue mix
State: 38.6%
Local: 38.9%
Federal: 22.5%
Instruction share
58.2%
of current spending · $9,048/pupil
Long-term debt
$19.8M
+28.6% since FY2017
Total revenue by year ($M)
Total expenditure by year ($M)

Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the Fallbrook Union High as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).

Oasis High (alternative) — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot

Public · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools

  • Senior-class enrollment is up 27% (30→38 from 2018 to 2026), outpacing the peer-group median of -3%.
  • At its recent rate (-0.8%/yr), enrollment projects to ~78 by 2029 — about 2 fewer students than today.

Enrollment projection

80 students (2026)
~78 projected (2029)
at -0.8%/yr

That's about 2 fewer students. At per-student funding of $ per student, that's roughly $0 in annual state funding at risk.

Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423 per ADA) — adjust to your district's actual per-pupil figure. Projection extrapolates the recent annual rate — not a forecast of intent.

Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools

School Type Size UC Reach Enroll. trend
Oasis High (alternative) Public 80 +27%
Peer-group median -3%
Ivy High (continuation) Public 71 -41%
Vista Visions Academy Public 62 +150%
Harbor Springs Charter School Public 70 +0%
Oak Glen High Public 73 +12%
Alta Vista High (continuation) Public 55 -59%
Foothills High School Public 61 -31%
Rancho Vista High Public 117 -2%
Surfside High (continuation) Public 111 +4%
Sunset High (continuation) Public 82 -27%
Major General Raymond Murray High Public 143 -4%

UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →

Is your school winning the families it should?

An Enrollment Trend Audit benchmarks your enrollment against nearby schools, shows who's gaining and losing families, and lays out a plan to make families choose you — built around the outcomes your families value. Built for principals, heads of school, and district leaders.

Request an Enrollment Trend Audit →