Mt. Tallac High

· El Dorado County · Lake Tahoe Unified
Public El Dorado County 🏛 Lake Tahoe Unified → CDS 0961903…
📄 Shareable scorecard →

Compare with peers

Most similar nearby schools

Independence High (continuation) → Confluence Continuation High → Sierra High (continuation) → Coleville High School → Bitney Prep High → Compare all similar →

No UC admissions data on file for Mt. Tallac High.

This school doesn't appear in UCOP's source-school records (it may send few or no applicants to UC). Its enrollment trend and similar-school comparison are still below.

Enrollment trend & projection

Total enrollment (9–12)
78 (2018)63 (2026)
-19.2%
Grade 12 (graduating class)
38 (2018)42 (2026)
+10.5%

If this trend holds (-2.6%/yr, Total enrollment)

At per-pupil funding of $ / student:

Horizon Projected Total enrollment Change Funding impact / yr
1 yr (2027) ~61 -2 $0
3 yr (2029) ~58 -5 $0
5 yr (2031) ~55 -8 $0

Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.

Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25

Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the El Dorado County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.

Action needed
Mid-year exits eroding share alongside county-wide pressure.

Tracking El Dorado County on enrollment (+10.5% vs. +8.6%), but stability (26.0%) is below the county median. Retention is the levered fix. Chronic absenteeism is also at 91.9% (up +18.4 pts from 2016-17) — engagement and demand are both signaling decline.

+10.5%  school enrollment (2018–2026)
+8.6%  El Dorado County baseline
+1.9pp  gap vs. county
26.0%  retention (county median 89.2%)
Enrollment — indexed to 100 at 2018
Stability rate by year (raw %)
Stability rate
26.0%
20 of 77 students

57 of 77 students who enrolled at Mt. Tallac High this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (74.0% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.

El Dorado County median
89.2% · school is in the 0th percentile of 10 HS
Statewide median
87.2% · in the 4th percentile of 1,688 HS

Stability by student group

Socio. disadvantaged (59) 27.1%
Hispanic / Latino (44) 34.1%
White (26) 11.5%

Nearest peer high schools

Independence High (continuation) 32.2% Confluence Continuation High 52.9% Sierra High (continuation) 48.8% Coleville High School 91.7% Bitney Prep High 77.5%

Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.

Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25

Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: grades 9–12.

Chronic absent
91.9%
68 of 74 students

Absenteeism is up 18.4 pp since 2016-17. A rising absenteeism trend often precedes formal departure — worth investigating which subgroups are driving it.

El Dorado County median
16.9% · school is worse than 100% of 10 HS
Statewide median
22.9%
Chronic absenteeism by year (raw %)

Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).

SBAC academic outcomes — grade 11, 2025

Share of grade-11 students meeting or exceeding the California standard on Smarter Balanced ELA and Math. This is the academic-readiness signal that pairs with UC Reach (post-grad outcomes), stability (retention), and absenteeism (engagement). Note: statewide median Math is only ~20% — a school at 20% isn't an outlier; one at 45%+ genuinely is.

ELA — met or exceeded
n = 21
4.8%
incl. 0.0% exceeded
-63.0 pts vs. El Dorado County median (67.8%) · CA median 54.3% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 79.3%
Math — met or exceeded
n = 21
0.0%
incl. 0.0% exceeded
-30.9 pts vs. El Dorado County median (30.9%) · CA median 21.1% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 53.6%

Source: California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) Smarter Balanced research files. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥30 tested students.

Student composition — 2025-26

HS grades 9–12 racial/ethnic composition and program subgroups, from CDE Census Day Enrollment. Two-year shift shown when ≥1 pt — surfaces how the community served has changed since 2023-24.

Race / ethnicity

Hispanic / Latino 65% +10.4
White 24% -12.1
American Indian 5%
Two or more 3% -1.5
Black / African Am. 2%
Not reported 2%

Program subgroups

Students w/ disabilities 75% +10.5

Source: California Department of Education, Census Day Enrollment 2025-26 (HS grades 9–12). Δ shown when shift is ≥1 pt since 2023-24. Categories below 0.5% omitted.

District financial profile — Lake Tahoe Unified (FY2020)

From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.

Total revenue
$57.8M
+6.5% since FY2017
Per-pupil revenue
$15,510
3,725 students enrolled
Revenue mix
State: 42.1%
Local: 48.8%
Federal: 9.1%
Instruction share
57.4%
of current spending · $8,295/pupil
Long-term debt
$103.5M
+1.8% since FY2017
Total revenue by year ($M)
Total expenditure by year ($M)

Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the Lake Tahoe Unified as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).

Mt. Tallac High — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot

Public · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools

  • Senior-class enrollment is up 10% (38→42 from 2018 to 2026), outpacing the peer-group median of -3%.
  • At its recent rate (-2.6%/yr), enrollment projects to ~58 by 2029 — about 5 fewer students than today.

Enrollment projection

63 students (2026)
~58 projected (2029)
at -2.6%/yr

That's about 5 fewer students. At per-student funding of $ per student, that's roughly $0 in annual state funding at risk.

Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423 per ADA) — adjust to your district's actual per-pupil figure. Projection extrapolates the recent annual rate — not a forecast of intent.

Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools

School Type Size UC Reach Enroll. trend
Mt. Tallac High Public 63 +10%
Peer-group median -3%
Independence High (continuation) Public 53 -7%
Confluence Continuation High Public 75 +104%
Sierra High (continuation) Public 32 -23%
Coleville High School Public 44 +0%
Bitney Prep High Public 93 +35%
Silver Springs High (continuation) Public 94 -29%
Independence Continuation Public 97 -3%
Loyalton High School Public 106 +43%
Vantage Point Charter Public 37 -36%
Folsom Lake High Public 36 -3%

UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →

Is your school winning the families it should?

An Enrollment Trend Audit benchmarks your enrollment against nearby schools, shows who's gaining and losing families, and lays out a plan to make families choose you — built around the outcomes your families value. Built for principals, heads of school, and district leaders.

Request an Enrollment Trend Audit →