Granada High

· Merced County · Le Grand Union High
Public Merced County 🏛 Le Grand Union High → CDS 2465730…
📄 Shareable scorecard →

Compare with peers

Most similar nearby schools

Gateway High (continuation) → Mendota Continuation High → Monarch Academy → Spring Hill High (continuation) → El Puente High → Compare all similar →

No UC admissions data on file for Granada High.

This school doesn't appear in UCOP's source-school records (it may send few or no applicants to UC). Its enrollment trend and similar-school comparison are still below.

Enrollment trend & projection

Total enrollment (9–12)
32 (2018)22 (2026)
-31.2%
Grade 12 (graduating class)
12 (2018)8 (2026)
-33.3%

If this trend holds (-4.6%/yr, Total enrollment)

At per-pupil funding of $ / student:

Horizon Projected Total enrollment Change Funding impact / yr
1 yr (2027) ~21 -1 $0
3 yr (2029) ~19 -3 $0
5 yr (2031) ~17 -5 $0

Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.

Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25

Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the Merced County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.

Critical
Compounding decline on both vectors.

Enrollment -33.3% vs. county +7.6% AND stability (27.5%) below the county median. Recruitment and retention both under pressure — likely a foundational rather than tactical problem. Chronic absenteeism is also at 44.4% (up +4.4 pts from 2017-18) — engagement and demand are both signaling decline.

-33.3%  school enrollment (2018–2026)
+7.6%  Merced County baseline
-40.9pp  gap vs. county
27.5%  retention (county median 87.2%)
Enrollment — indexed to 100 at 2018
Stability rate by year (raw %)
Stability rate
27.5%
11 of 40 students

29 of 40 students who enrolled at Granada High this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (72.5% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.

Merced County median
87.2% · school is in the 11th percentile of 19 HS
Statewide median
87.2% · in the 5th percentile of 1,688 HS

Stability by student group

Socio. disadvantaged (40) 27.5%
Hispanic / Latino (38) 28.9%

Nearest peer high schools

Gateway High (continuation) 52.3% Mendota Continuation High 26.2% Monarch Academy 90.0% Spring Hill High (continuation) 28.6% El Puente High 3.0%

Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.

Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25

Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: grades 9–12.

Chronic absent
44.4%
16 of 36 students

Absenteeism is up 4.4 pp since 2017-18. A rising absenteeism trend often precedes formal departure — worth investigating which subgroups are driving it.

Merced County median
26.3% · school is worse than 84% of 19 HS
Statewide median
22.9%
Chronic absenteeism by year (raw %)

Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).

SBAC academic outcomes — grade 11, 2024

Share of grade-11 students meeting or exceeding the California standard on Smarter Balanced ELA and Math. This is the academic-readiness signal that pairs with UC Reach (post-grad outcomes), stability (retention), and absenteeism (engagement). Note: statewide median Math is only ~20% — a school at 20% isn't an outlier; one at 45%+ genuinely is.

ELA — met or exceeded
n = 29
20.7%
incl. 3.5% exceeded
-23.4 pts vs. Merced County median (44.1%) · CA median 52.4% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 78.4%
Math — met or exceeded
n = 29
3.5%
incl. 0.0% exceeded
-8.1 pts vs. Merced County median (11.5%) · CA median 18.5% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 52.1%

Source: California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) Smarter Balanced research files. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥30 tested students.

Student composition — 2025-26

HS grades 9–12 racial/ethnic composition and program subgroups, from CDE Census Day Enrollment. Two-year shift shown when ≥1 pt — surfaces how the community served has changed since 2023-24.

Race / ethnicity

Hispanic / Latino 100% +6.1

Program subgroups

Students w/ disabilities 54% -12.2

Source: California Department of Education, Census Day Enrollment 2025-26 (HS grades 9–12). Δ shown when shift is ≥1 pt since 2023-24. Categories below 0.5% omitted.

District financial profile — Le Grand Union High (FY2020)

From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.

Total revenue
$10.5M
+21.0% since FY2017
Per-pupil revenue
$20,391
514 students enrolled
Revenue mix
State: 56.5%
Local: 25.6%
Federal: 17.9%
Instruction share
48.6%
of current spending · $9,607/pupil
Long-term debt
$5.3M
+121.9% since FY2017
Total revenue by year ($M)
Total expenditure by year ($M)

Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the Le Grand Union High as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).

Granada High — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot

Public · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools

  • Senior-class enrollment is down 33% (12→8 from 2018 to 2026), trailing the peer-group median of +100%.
  • At its recent rate (-4.6%/yr), enrollment projects to ~19 by 2029 — about 3 fewer students than today.

Enrollment projection

22 students (2026)
~19 projected (2029)
at -4.6%/yr

That's about 3 fewer students. At per-student funding of $ per student, that's roughly $0 in annual state funding at risk.

Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423 per ADA) — adjust to your district's actual per-pupil figure. Projection extrapolates the recent annual rate — not a forecast of intent.

Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools

School Type Size UC Reach Enroll. trend
Granada High Public 22 -33%
Peer-group median +100%
Gateway High (continuation) Public 53 +230%
Mendota Continuation High Public 23 +333%
Monarch Academy Public 37 +100%
Spring Hill High (continuation) Public 37 +1600%
El Puente High Public 12 -20%
Madera County Independent Academy Public 52
Don Pedro High Public 42 +43%
Independence High (alternative) Public 94 +95%
Independence Continuation High Public 50 +162%
Sherman Thomas Charter Public 78 +50%

UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →

Is your school winning the families it should?

An Enrollment Trend Audit benchmarks your enrollment against nearby schools, shows who's gaining and losing families, and lays out a plan to make families choose you — built around the outcomes your families value. Built for principals, heads of school, and district leaders.

Request an Enrollment Trend Audit →