Sherman Thomas Charter

· Madera County · Madera Unified
Public Madera County 🏛 Madera Unified → CDS 2065243…
📄 Shareable scorecard →

Compare with peers

Most similar nearby schools

Madera County Independent Academy → Mountain Vista High → Independence Continuation High → Gateway High (continuation) → Enterprise High → Compare all similar →

No UC admissions data on file for Sherman Thomas Charter.

This school doesn't appear in UCOP's source-school records (it may send few or no applicants to UC). Its enrollment trend and similar-school comparison are still below.

Enrollment trend & projection

Total enrollment (9–12)
57 (2018)78 (2026)
+36.8%
Grade 12 (graduating class)
12 (2018)18 (2026)
+50.0%

If this trend holds (+4.0%/yr, Total enrollment)

At per-pupil funding of $ / student:

Horizon Projected Total enrollment Change Funding impact / yr
1 yr (2027) ~81 +3 $0
3 yr (2029) ~88 +10 $0
5 yr (2031) ~95 +17 $0

Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.

Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25

Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the Madera County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.

Mixed signal
Demand outpacing county is masking internal churn.

Enrollment growth is beating Madera County (+50.0% vs. +6.9%), but 20 of 82 students didn't maintain continuous enrollment. Why are families leaving once enrolled?

+50.0%  school enrollment (2018–2026)
+6.9%  Madera County baseline
+43.1pp  gap vs. county
75.6%  retention (county median 86.3%)
Enrollment — indexed to 100 at 2018
Stability rate by year (raw %)
Stability rate
75.6%
62 of 82 students

20 of 82 students who enrolled at Sherman Thomas Charter this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (24.4% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.

Madera County median
86.3% · school is in the 20th percentile of 10 HS
Statewide median
87.2% · in the 26th percentile of 1,688 HS

Stability by student group

Hispanic / Latino (60) 71.7%
Socio. disadvantaged (53) 67.9%

Nearest peer high schools

Madera County Independent Academy 50.5% Mountain Vista High 57.1% Independence Continuation High 40.0% Gateway High (continuation) 52.3% Enterprise High 45.3%

Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.

Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25

Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: grades 9–12.

Chronic absent
20.0%
16 of 80 students

Absenteeism is down 3.7 pp since 2016-17. Engagement improving — a positive trajectory worth understanding and reinforcing.

Madera County median
30.5% · school is better than 80% of 10 HS
Statewide median
22.9%
Chronic absenteeism by year (raw %)

Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).

SBAC academic outcomes — grade 11, 2025

Share of grade-11 students meeting or exceeding the California standard on Smarter Balanced ELA and Math. This is the academic-readiness signal that pairs with UC Reach (post-grad outcomes), stability (retention), and absenteeism (engagement). Note: statewide median Math is only ~20% — a school at 20% isn't an outlier; one at 45%+ genuinely is.

ELA — met or exceeded
n = 21
66.7%
incl. 23.8% exceeded
+12.4 pts above Madera County median (54.3%) · CA median 54.3% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 79.3%
Math — met or exceeded
n = 21
23.8%
incl. 9.5% exceeded
+9.7 pts above Madera County median (14.1%) · CA median 21.1% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 53.6%

Source: California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) Smarter Balanced research files. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥30 tested students.

Student composition — 2025-26

HS grades 9–12 racial/ethnic composition and program subgroups, from CDE Census Day Enrollment. Two-year shift shown when ≥1 pt — surfaces how the community served has changed since 2023-24.

Race / ethnicity

Hispanic / Latino 78% +10.6
White 19% -9.0
Asian 1%
Black / African Am. 1% -1.5

Program subgroups

Students w/ disabilities 54% +13.0

Source: California Department of Education, Census Day Enrollment 2025-26 (HS grades 9–12). Δ shown when shift is ≥1 pt since 2023-24. Categories below 0.5% omitted.

District financial profile — Madera Unified (FY2020)

From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.

Total revenue
$368.3M
+28.0% since FY2017
Per-pupil revenue
$18,470
19,941 students enrolled
Revenue mix
State: 69.5%
Local: 15.4%
Federal: 15.1%
Instruction share
55.8%
of current spending · $8,116/pupil
Long-term debt
$288.4M
+93.9% since FY2017
Total revenue by year ($M)
Total expenditure by year ($M)

Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the Madera Unified as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).

Sherman Thomas Charter — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot

Public · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools

  • Senior-class enrollment is up 50% (12→18 from 2018 to 2026), outpacing the peer-group median of +0%.
  • Enrollment has been growing (+4.0%/yr); projects to ~88 by 2029.

Enrollment projection

78 students (2026)
~88 projected (2029)
at +4.0%/yr

Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools

School Type Size UC Reach Enroll. trend
Sherman Thomas Charter Public 78 +50%
Peer-group median +0%
Madera County Independent Academy Public 52
Mountain Vista High Public 123 +0%
Independence Continuation High Public 50 +162%
Gateway High (continuation) Public 53 +230%
Enterprise High Public 52 -25%
Pershing Continuation High Public 105 -15%
Chawanakee Academy Charter Public 164 -43%
Dewolf Continuation High Public 194 +84%
Elm High Public 47 -60%
Minarets Charter High School Public 173 +4%

UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →

Is your school winning the families it should?

An Enrollment Trend Audit benchmarks your enrollment against nearby schools, shows who's gaining and losing families, and lays out a plan to make families choose you — built around the outcomes your families value. Built for principals, heads of school, and district leaders.

Request an Enrollment Trend Audit →