Mendota Continuation High

· Fresno County · Mendota Unified
Public Fresno County 🏛 Mendota Unified → CDS 1075127…
📄 Shareable scorecard →

Compare with peers

Most similar nearby schools

El Puente High → Granada High → Enterprise High → Easton Continuation High → Madera County Independent Academy → Compare all similar →

No UC admissions data on file for Mendota Continuation High.

This school doesn't appear in UCOP's source-school records (it may send few or no applicants to UC). Its enrollment trend and similar-school comparison are still below.

Enrollment trend & projection

Total enrollment (9–12)
13 (2018)23 (2026)
+76.9%
Grade 12 (graduating class)
3 (2018)13 (2026)
+333.3%

If this trend holds (+7.4%/yr, Total enrollment)

At per-pupil funding of $ / student:

Horizon Projected Total enrollment Change Funding impact / yr
1 yr (2027) ~25 +2 $0
3 yr (2029) ~28 +5 $0
5 yr (2031) ~33 +10 $0

Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.

Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25

Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the Fresno County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.

Mixed signal
Demand outpacing county is masking internal churn.

Enrollment growth is beating Fresno County (+333.3% vs. +6.7%), but 31 of 42 students didn't maintain continuous enrollment. Why are families leaving once enrolled? Chronic absenteeism is also at 88.6% (up +24.1 pts from 2016-17) — engagement and demand are both signaling decline.

+333.3%  school enrollment (2018–2026)
+6.7%  Fresno County baseline
+326.6pp  gap vs. county
26.2%  retention (county median 85.0%)
Enrollment — indexed to 100 at 2018
Stability rate by year (raw %)
Stability rate
26.2%
11 of 42 students

31 of 42 students who enrolled at Mendota Continuation High this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (73.8% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.

Fresno County median
85.0% · school is in the 4th percentile of 55 HS
Statewide median
87.2% · in the 4th percentile of 1,688 HS

Stability by student group

Socio. disadvantaged (41) 26.8%
Hispanic / Latino (40) 25.0%
English learners (24) 25.0%

Nearest peer high schools

El Puente High 3.0% Granada High 27.5% Enterprise High 45.3% Easton Continuation High 16.7% Madera County Independent Academy 50.5%

Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.

Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25

Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: grades 9–12.

Chronic absent
88.6%
31 of 35 students

Absenteeism is up 24.1 pp since 2016-17. A rising absenteeism trend often precedes formal departure — worth investigating which subgroups are driving it.

Fresno County median
21.5% · school is worse than 98% of 55 HS
Statewide median
22.9%
Chronic absenteeism by year (raw %)

Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).

SBAC academic outcomes — grade 11, 2024

Share of grade-11 students meeting or exceeding the California standard on Smarter Balanced ELA and Math. This is the academic-readiness signal that pairs with UC Reach (post-grad outcomes), stability (retention), and absenteeism (engagement). Note: statewide median Math is only ~20% — a school at 20% isn't an outlier; one at 45%+ genuinely is.

ELA — met or exceeded
n = 13
15.4%
incl. 7.7% exceeded
-35.3 pts vs. Fresno County median (50.7%) · CA median 52.4% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 78.4%
Math — met or exceeded
n = 14
0.0%
incl. 0.0% exceeded
-13.1 pts vs. Fresno County median (13.1%) · CA median 18.5% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 52.1%

Source: California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) Smarter Balanced research files. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥30 tested students.

Student composition — 2025-26

HS grades 9–12 racial/ethnic composition and program subgroups, from CDE Census Day Enrollment. Two-year shift shown when ≥1 pt — surfaces how the community served has changed since 2023-24.

Race / ethnicity

Hispanic / Latino 100%

Program subgroups

Students w/ disabilities 56% -27.7

Source: California Department of Education, Census Day Enrollment 2025-26 (HS grades 9–12). Δ shown when shift is ≥1 pt since 2023-24. Categories below 0.5% omitted.

District financial profile — Mendota Unified (FY2020)

From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.

Total revenue
$65.2M
+27.4% since FY2017
Per-pupil revenue
$17,773
3,668 students enrolled
Revenue mix
State: 71.2%
Local: 10.5%
Federal: 18.3%
Instruction share
63.7%
of current spending · $8,868/pupil
Long-term debt
$34.1M
-0.5% since FY2017
Total revenue by year ($M)
Total expenditure by year ($M)

Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the Mendota Unified as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).

Mendota Continuation High — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot

Public · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools

  • Senior-class enrollment is up 333% (3→13 from 2018 to 2026), outpacing the peer-group median of -20%.
  • Enrollment has been growing (+7.4%/yr); projects to ~28 by 2029.

Enrollment projection

23 students (2026)
~28 projected (2029)
at +7.4%/yr

Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools

School Type Size UC Reach Enroll. trend
Mendota Continuation High Public 23 +333%
Peer-group median -20%
El Puente High Public 12 -20%
Granada High Public 22 -33%
Enterprise High Public 52 -25%
Easton Continuation High Public 18 +75%
Madera County Independent Academy Public 52
Rio Del Rey High (continuation) Public 9 -80%
Westside High Public 62 +25%
Violet Heintz Education Academy Public 32 -62%
Gateway High (continuation) Public 53 +230%
Marc High Public 13 +0%

UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →

Is your school winning the families it should?

An Enrollment Trend Audit benchmarks your enrollment against nearby schools, shows who's gaining and losing families, and lays out a plan to make families choose you — built around the outcomes your families value. Built for principals, heads of school, and district leaders.

Request an Enrollment Trend Audit →