Citrus High

· Tulare County · Porterville Unified
Public Tulare County 🏛 Porterville Unified → CDS 5475523…
📄 Shareable scorecard →

Compare with peers

Most similar nearby schools

Porterville Military Academy → Strathmore High School → Accelerated Charter High → Butterfield Charter → La Sierra High → Compare all similar →

No UC admissions data on file for Citrus High.

This school doesn't appear in UCOP's source-school records (it may send few or no applicants to UC). Its enrollment trend and similar-school comparison are still below.

Enrollment trend & projection

Total enrollment (9–12)
149 (2018)145 (2026)
-2.7%
Grade 12 (graduating class)
105 (2018)98 (2026)
-6.7%

If this trend holds (-0.3%/yr, Total enrollment)

At per-pupil funding of $ / student:

Horizon Projected Total enrollment Change Funding impact / yr
1 yr (2027) ~145 +0 $0
3 yr (2029) ~144 -1 $0
5 yr (2031) ~143 -2 $0

Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.

Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25

Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the Tulare County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.

Critical
Bleeding from both ends.

Enrollment down 6.7% vs. county +2.2%, AND stability (32.8%) below the county median. Fewer families are choosing the school, and the ones who do aren't staying through year-end. Chronic absenteeism is also at 72.2% (up -0.8 pts from 2016-17) — engagement and demand are both signaling decline.

-6.7%  school enrollment (2018–2026)
+2.2%  Tulare County baseline
-8.9pp  gap vs. county
32.8%  retention (county median 85.8%)
Enrollment — indexed to 100 at 2018
Stability rate by year (raw %)
Stability rate
32.8%
76 of 232 students

156 of 232 students who enrolled at Citrus High this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (67.2% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.

Tulare County median
85.8% · school is in the 16th percentile of 31 HS
Statewide median
87.2% · in the 8th percentile of 1,688 HS

Stability by student group

Socio. disadvantaged (228) 32.9%
Hispanic / Latino (191) 32.5%
English learners (60) 26.7%
White (24) 29.2%

Nearest peer high schools

Porterville Military Academy 89.6% Strathmore High School 82.4% Accelerated Charter High 22.4% Butterfield Charter 44.5% La Sierra High 58.1%

Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.

Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25

Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: grades 9–12.

Chronic absent
72.2%
156 of 216 students

Roughly one in three students is chronically absent. A floor this high signals systemic engagement problems beyond what any single intervention can fix.

Tulare County median
17.1% · school is worse than 90% of 31 HS
Statewide median
22.9%
Chronic absenteeism by year (raw %)

Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).

SBAC academic outcomes — grade 11, 2025

Share of grade-11 students meeting or exceeding the California standard on Smarter Balanced ELA and Math. This is the academic-readiness signal that pairs with UC Reach (post-grad outcomes), stability (retention), and absenteeism (engagement). Note: statewide median Math is only ~20% — a school at 20% isn't an outlier; one at 45%+ genuinely is.

ELA — met or exceeded
n = 48
8.3%
incl. 2.1% exceeded
-48.8 pts vs. Tulare County median (57.1%) · CA median 54.3% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 79.3%
Math — met or exceeded
n = 48
0.0%
incl. 0.0% exceeded
-19.2 pts vs. Tulare County median (19.2%) · CA median 21.1% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 53.6%

Source: California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) Smarter Balanced research files. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥30 tested students.

Student composition — 2025-26

HS grades 9–12 racial/ethnic composition and program subgroups, from CDE Census Day Enrollment. Two-year shift shown when ≥1 pt — surfaces how the community served has changed since 2023-24.

Race / ethnicity

Hispanic / Latino 83%
White 8% -1.1
American Indian 7% +2.8
Two or more 1%
Asian 1%

Program subgroups

Students w/ disabilities 97% +10.7
English learners 20% -14.1

Source: California Department of Education, Census Day Enrollment 2025-26 (HS grades 9–12). Δ shown when shift is ≥1 pt since 2023-24. Categories below 0.5% omitted.

District financial profile — Porterville Unified (FY2020)

From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.

Total revenue
$276.7M
+34.5% since FY2017
Per-pupil revenue
$19,253
14,372 students enrolled
Revenue mix
State: 72.0%
Local: 12.3%
Federal: 15.7%
Instruction share
59.9%
of current spending · $8,081/pupil
Long-term debt
$49.3M
-20.7% since FY2017
Total revenue by year ($M)
Total expenditure by year ($M)

Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the Porterville Unified as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).

Citrus High — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot

Public · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools

  • Senior-class enrollment is down 7% (105→98 from 2018 to 2026), outpacing the peer-group median of -17%.
  • At its recent rate (-0.3%/yr), enrollment projects to ~144 by 2029 — about 1 fewer students than today.

Enrollment projection

145 students (2026)
~144 projected (2029)
at -0.3%/yr

That's about 1 fewer students. At per-student funding of $ per student, that's roughly $0 in annual state funding at risk.

Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423 per ADA) — adjust to your district's actual per-pupil figure. Projection extrapolates the recent annual rate — not a forecast of intent.

Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools

School Type Size UC Reach Enroll. trend
Citrus High Public 145 -7%
Peer-group median 17.0% -17%
Porterville Military Academy Public 285 +52%
Strathmore High School Public 292 7.0% +10%
Accelerated Charter High Public 151 -1%
Butterfield Charter Public 365 -0%
La Sierra High Public 188 -52%
Harmony Magnet Academy Public 498 27.0% -12%
John J. Cairns Continuation Public 47 -56%
Alpaugh High School Public 117 -24%
Sequoia High Public 241 -29%
Valley High Public 67 -22%

UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →

Is your school winning the families it should?

An Enrollment Trend Audit benchmarks your enrollment against nearby schools, shows who's gaining and losing families, and lays out a plan to make families choose you — built around the outcomes your families value. Built for principals, heads of school, and district leaders.

Request an Enrollment Trend Audit →