Strathmore High School

Porterville · Tulare County · Porterville Unified
Public Tulare County 🏛 Porterville Unified → ~55 seniors CDS 5475523…
📄 Shareable scorecard →

Compare with peers

Most similar nearby schools

Porterville Military Academy → Butterfield Charter → Harmony Magnet Academy → Citrus High → Sequoia High → Compare all similar →

Enrollment trend & projection

Total enrollment (9–12)
375 (2018)292 (2026)
-22.1%
Grade 12 (graduating class)
68 (2018)75 (2026)
+10.3%

If this trend holds (-3.1%/yr, Total enrollment)

At per-pupil funding of $ / student:

Horizon Projected Total enrollment Change Funding impact / yr
1 yr (2027) ~283 -9 $0
3 yr (2029) ~266 -26 $0
5 yr (2031) ~250 -42 $0

Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.

Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25

Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the Tulare County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.

Mixed signal
Demand outpacing county is masking internal churn.

Enrollment growth is beating Tulare County (+10.3% vs. +2.2%), but 57 of 324 students didn't maintain continuous enrollment. Why are families leaving once enrolled?

+10.3%  school enrollment (2018–2026)
+2.2%  Tulare County baseline
+8.1pp  gap vs. county
82.4%  retention (county median 85.8%)
Enrollment — indexed to 100 at 2018
Stability rate by year (raw %)
Stability rate
82.4%
267 of 324 students

57 of 324 students who enrolled at Strathmore High School this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (17.6% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.

Tulare County median
85.8% · school is in the 35th percentile of 31 HS
Statewide median
87.2% · in the 35th percentile of 1,688 HS

Stability by student group

Socio. disadvantaged (288) 83.3%
Hispanic / Latino (284) 83.8%
English learners (105) 81.9%
Students w/ disabilities (41) 75.6%
White (36) 69.4%

Nearest peer high schools

Porterville Military Academy 89.6% Butterfield Charter 44.5% Harmony Magnet Academy 95.8% Citrus High 32.8% Sequoia High 27.4%

Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.

Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25

Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: grades 9–12.

Chronic absent
18.6%
57 of 306 students

Absenteeism is up 3.4 pp since 2016-17. A rising absenteeism trend often precedes formal departure — worth investigating which subgroups are driving it.

Tulare County median
17.1% · school is worse than 61% of 31 HS
Statewide median
22.9%
Chronic absenteeism by year (raw %)

Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).

SBAC academic outcomes — grade 11, 2025

Share of grade-11 students meeting or exceeding the California standard on Smarter Balanced ELA and Math. This is the academic-readiness signal that pairs with UC Reach (post-grad outcomes), stability (retention), and absenteeism (engagement). Note: statewide median Math is only ~20% — a school at 20% isn't an outlier; one at 45%+ genuinely is.

ELA — met or exceeded
n = 78
38.5%
incl. 16.7% exceeded
-18.6 pts vs. Tulare County median (57.1%) · CA median 54.3% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 79.3%
Math — met or exceeded
n = 78
12.8%
incl. 1.3% exceeded
-6.4 pts vs. Tulare County median (19.2%) · CA median 21.1% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 53.6%

Source: California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) Smarter Balanced research files. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥30 tested students.

Student composition — 2025-26

HS grades 9–12 racial/ethnic composition and program subgroups, from CDE Census Day Enrollment. Two-year shift shown when ≥1 pt — surfaces how the community served has changed since 2023-24.

Race / ethnicity

Hispanic / Latino 84% -5.1
White 14% +6.2
Two or more 1%

Program subgroups

Students w/ disabilities 87% +15.1
English learners 30% -10.0
Socioeconomically disadv. 5% -3.8

Source: California Department of Education, Census Day Enrollment 2025-26 (HS grades 9–12). Δ shown when shift is ≥1 pt since 2023-24. Categories below 0.5% omitted.

District financial profile — Porterville Unified (FY2020)

From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.

Total revenue
$276.7M
+34.5% since FY2017
Per-pupil revenue
$19,253
14,372 students enrolled
Revenue mix
State: 72.0%
Local: 12.3%
Federal: 15.7%
Instruction share
59.9%
of current spending · $8,081/pupil
Long-term debt
$49.3M
-20.7% since FY2017
Total revenue by year ($M)
Total expenditure by year ($M)

Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the Porterville Unified as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).

University of California outcomes · Class of 2025
UC Reach
N/A
UC Application Reach
23.6%
13 applications
In context: CA median 78.3% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 245.8% · higher than 6% of CA HS.
UC Admit Rate
N/A
None / 13 applications
UC Yield Rate
N/A
None enrolled of None admitted
Yield vs. Enrollment Reach: Yield answers "of UC admits, what % chose UC?" — denominator is just the admits. A small admitted cohort can post a low yield even when the school sends a healthy share of its class to UC.
UC Enrollment Reach
N/A
None enrollees / 55 seniors
Enrollment Reach vs. Yield: Reach answers "of the whole senior class, what % ended up at UC?" — denominator is everyone. High Yield with low Enrollment Reach is common at elite privates: most admits matriculate, but the school sends most of its class to non-UC selective colleges.
Student-Counselor Ratio
292:1
1.0 FTE counselors · 292 students
In context: CA median 338:1 · 46 fewer students per counselor · ASCA target 250:1.
A-G Completion
38%
19 of 50 graduates · 2024-25 cohort
In context: CA median 55.9% · -17.9 pp vs. median · Tulare Co. 42.2%.
Selective UC Reach (UCSD, UCSB, UCI, UCD)
N/A
Elite UC Reach (UCB + UCLA)
N/A
Senior Class Size
55
CDE grade 12 (exact)
Total School Enrollment
286
All grades · CDE Census Day
Economic Connectedness
0.48
4th percentile in CA · cross‑class friendships

Strathmore High School — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot

Public · Porterville · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools

  • On UC Reach, Strathmore High School sits near the bottom of its similar-school group (ranked #4 of 4): 7% vs. a peer median of 20%.
  • Senior-class enrollment is up 10% (68→75 from 2018 to 2026), outpacing the peer-group median of -4%.
  • At its recent rate (-3.1%/yr), enrollment projects to ~266 by 2029 — about 26 fewer students than today.

Enrollment projection

292 students (2026)
~266 projected (2029)
at -3.1%/yr

That's about 26 fewer students. At per-student funding of $ per student, that's roughly $0 in annual state funding at risk.

Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423 per ADA) — adjust to your district's actual per-pupil figure. Projection extrapolates the recent annual rate — not a forecast of intent.

Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools

School Type Size UC Reach Enroll. trend
Strathmore High School Public 292 7.0% +10%
Peer-group median 19.8% -4%
Porterville Military Academy Public 285 +52%
Butterfield Charter Public 365 -0%
Harmony Magnet Academy Public 498 27.0% -12%
Citrus High Public 145 -7%
Sequoia High Public 241 -29%
La Sierra High Public 188 -52%
Accelerated Charter High Public 151 -1%
Visalia Charter Independent Study Public 551 -15%
Farmersville High School Public 678 13.8% +0%
Lindsay High School Public 1064 19.8% +9%

UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →

Avg. Applicant GPA · top-6 UCs
3.61

UC Outcomes Trend — 2018–2025

UC Admit Rate %
UC Reach % (where available)
UC Admits (count, right axis)

Class size from CDE grade 12 enrollment. Campus-level data — applicant/admit totals may count a student at multiple campuses more than once.

Campus Breakdown — 2025

Campus Applicants Admits Enrollees Admit Rate UC Reach Yield Avg GPA (App) Avg GPA (Adm)
UC Irvine → Selective 6 3.71
UC Davis → 7 3.53
⚠ Campus-level totals may count one student admitted to multiple UC campuses more than once. Admit Volume metrics are not the same as UC Reach, which requires unique-student counts. See methodology →

What This Means

Note: admit counts used here are campus-level totals. A student admitted to both UCLA and UCSD is counted twice. When UCOP unique-student data becomes available it will be loaded automatically and the labels will update.
Compare with other schools → See Tulare County rankings →

Is your school winning the families it should?

An Enrollment Trend Audit benchmarks your enrollment against nearby schools, shows who's gaining and losing families, and lays out a plan to make families choose you — built around the outcomes your families value. Built for principals, heads of school, and district leaders.

Request an Enrollment Trend Audit →