Central Unified Alternative/Opportunity

· Fresno County · Central Unified
Public Fresno County 🏛 Central Unified → CDS 1073965…
📄 Shareable scorecard →

Compare with peers

Most similar nearby schools

Design Science Middle College High → Ambassador Phillip V. Sanchez Ii Public Charter → Dewolf Continuation High → W.e.b. Dubois Public Charter → Endeavor Charter → Compare all similar →

No UC admissions data on file for Central Unified Alternative/Opportunity.

This school doesn't appear in UCOP's source-school records (it may send few or no applicants to UC). Its enrollment trend and similar-school comparison are still below.

Enrollment trend & projection

Total enrollment (9–12)
218 (2018)262 (2026)
+20.2%
Grade 12 (graduating class)
101 (2018)112 (2026)
+10.9%

If this trend holds (+2.3%/yr, Total enrollment)

At per-pupil funding of $ / student:

Horizon Projected Total enrollment Change Funding impact / yr
1 yr (2027) ~268 +6 $0
3 yr (2029) ~281 +19 $0
5 yr (2031) ~294 +32 $0

Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.

Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25

Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the Fresno County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.

Mixed signal
Demand outpacing county is masking internal churn.

Enrollment growth is beating Fresno County (+10.9% vs. +6.7%), but 231 of 386 students didn't maintain continuous enrollment. Why are families leaving once enrolled? Chronic absenteeism is also at 49.2% (up +29.5 pts from 2016-17) — engagement and demand are both signaling decline.

+10.9%  school enrollment (2018–2026)
+6.7%  Fresno County baseline
+4.2pp  gap vs. county
40.2%  retention (county median 85.0%)
Enrollment — indexed to 100 at 2018
Stability rate by year (raw %)
Stability rate
40.2%
155 of 386 students

231 of 386 students who enrolled at Central Unified Alternative/Opportunity this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (59.8% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.

Fresno County median
85.0% · school is in the 13th percentile of 55 HS
Statewide median
87.2% · in the 12th percentile of 1,688 HS

Stability by student group

Socio. disadvantaged (363) 40.2%
Hispanic / Latino (303) 44.6%
Students w/ disabilities (87) 52.9%
White (54) 38.9%
English learners (44) 43.2%
Black / African Am. (29) 41.4%

Nearest peer high schools

Design Science Middle College High 96.0% Ambassador Phillip V. Sanchez Ii Public Charter 44.3% Dewolf Continuation High 33.6% W.e.b. Dubois Public Charter 71.3% Endeavor Charter 84.7%

Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.

Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25

Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: grades 9–12.

Chronic absent
50.1%
180 of 359 students

Absenteeism is up 30.4 pp since 2016-17. A rising absenteeism trend often precedes formal departure — worth investigating which subgroups are driving it.

Fresno County median
21.5% · school is worse than 82% of 55 HS
Statewide median
22.9%
Chronic absenteeism by year (raw %)

Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).

SBAC academic outcomes — grade 11, 2025

Share of grade-11 students meeting or exceeding the California standard on Smarter Balanced ELA and Math. This is the academic-readiness signal that pairs with UC Reach (post-grad outcomes), stability (retention), and absenteeism (engagement). Note: statewide median Math is only ~20% — a school at 20% isn't an outlier; one at 45%+ genuinely is.

ELA — met or exceeded
n = 58
24.1%
incl. 3.5% exceeded
-31.1 pts vs. Fresno County median (55.2%) · CA median 54.3% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 79.3%
Math — met or exceeded
n = 58
3.5%
incl. 3.5% exceeded
-14.7 pts vs. Fresno County median (18.1%) · CA median 21.1% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 53.6%

Source: California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) Smarter Balanced research files. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥30 tested students.

Student composition — 2025-26

HS grades 9–12 racial/ethnic composition and program subgroups, from CDE Census Day Enrollment. Two-year shift shown when ≥1 pt — surfaces how the community served has changed since 2023-24.

Race / ethnicity

Hispanic / Latino 74% +2.6
White 10%
Asian 6%
Black / African Am. 6% -3.7
American Indian 1%
Filipino 1%

Program subgroups

Students w/ disabilities 83% +4.1
Socioeconomically disadv. 18% +3.4
English learners 6% -1.6

Source: California Department of Education, Census Day Enrollment 2025-26 (HS grades 9–12). Δ shown when shift is ≥1 pt since 2023-24. Categories below 0.5% omitted.

District financial profile — Central Unified (FY2020)

From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.

Total revenue
$250.6M
+20.4% since FY2017
Per-pupil revenue
$15,921
15,742 students enrolled
Revenue mix
State: 68.4%
Local: 18.3%
Federal: 13.3%
Instruction share
56.3%
of current spending · $7,523/pupil
Long-term debt
$207.1M
+46.8% since FY2017
Total revenue by year ($M)
Total expenditure by year ($M)

Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the Central Unified as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).

Central Unified Alternative/Opportunity — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot

Public · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools

  • Senior-class enrollment is up 11% (101→112 from 2018 to 2026), outpacing the peer-group median of -1%.
  • Enrollment has been growing (+2.3%/yr); projects to ~281 by 2029.

Enrollment projection

262 students (2026)
~281 projected (2029)
at +2.3%/yr

Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools

School Type Size UC Reach Enroll. trend
Central Unified Alternative/Opportunity Public 262 +11%
Peer-group median -1%
Design Science Middle College High Public 256 +0%
Ambassador Phillip V. Sanchez Ii Public Charter Public 254 +143%
Dewolf Continuation High Public 194 +84%
W.e.b. Dubois Public Charter Public 298 -62%
Endeavor Charter Public 343 +338%
Career Technical Education Charter Public 339 +9%
Carter G. Woodson Public Charter Public 369 -8%
Sierra Charter School Public 202 -2%
West Park Charter Academy Public 183 -61%
Gateway High (continuation) Public 220 -24%

UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →

Is your school winning the families it should?

An Enrollment Trend Audit benchmarks your enrollment against nearby schools, shows who's gaining and losing families, and lays out a plan to make families choose you — built around the outcomes your families value. Built for principals, heads of school, and district leaders.

Request an Enrollment Trend Audit →