Westside Preparatory Charter

· Sacramento County · Twin Rivers Unified
Public Sacramento County 🏛 Twin Rivers Unified → CDS 3476505…
📄 Shareable scorecard →

Compare with peers

Most similar nearby schools

Norwood Junior High → Higher Learning Academy → Highlands Community Charter → Natomas Pacific Pathways Prep Elementary → Natomas Pacific Pathways Prep Middle → Compare all similar →

No UC admissions data on file for Westside Preparatory Charter.

This school doesn't appear in UCOP's source-school records (it may send few or no applicants to UC). Its enrollment trend and similar-school comparison are still below.

Enrollment trend & projection

Total enrollment
385 (2018)484 (2026)
+25.7%

If this trend holds (+2.9%/yr, Total enrollment)

At per-pupil funding of $ / student:

Horizon Projected Total enrollment Change Funding impact / yr
1 yr (2027) ~498 +14 $0
3 yr (2029) ~527 +43 $0
5 yr (2031) ~558 +74 $0

Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.

Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25

Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the Sacramento County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.

Stability rate
89.2%
456 of 511 students

55 of 511 students who enrolled at Westside Preparatory Charter this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (10.8% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.

Sacramento County median
81.7% · school is in the 77th percentile of 100 HS
Statewide median
88.7% · in the 53rd percentile of 2,648 HS

Stability by student group

Socio. disadvantaged (418) 90.0%
Hispanic / Latino (208) 91.8%
White (126) 88.9%
English learners (95) 91.6%
Black / African Am. (61) 80.3%
Students w/ disabilities (60) 85.0%

Nearest peer high schools

Norwood Junior High 86.2% Higher Learning Academy 88.7% Highlands Community Charter 41.5% Natomas Pacific Pathways Prep Elementary 97.0% Natomas Pacific Pathways Prep Middle 98.1%

Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.

Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25

Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: total enrollment.

Chronic absent
15.5%
78 of 502 students

Absenteeism is up 10.6 pp since 2016-17. A rising absenteeism trend often precedes formal departure — worth investigating which subgroups are driving it.

Sacramento County median
25.8% · school is better than 77% of 99 HS
Statewide median
20.9%
Chronic absenteeism by year (raw %)

Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).

District financial profile — Twin Rivers Unified (FY2020)

From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.

Total revenue
$536.8M
+15.0% since FY2017
Per-pupil revenue
$21,914
24,497 students enrolled
Revenue mix
State: 61.8%
Local: 18.8%
Federal: 19.4%
Instruction share
56.3%
of current spending · $9,076/pupil
Long-term debt
$362.4M
0.0% since FY2017
Total revenue by year ($M)
Total expenditure by year ($M)

Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the Twin Rivers Unified as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).

Westside Preparatory Charter — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot

Public · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools

  • Enrollment has been growing (+2.9%/yr); projects to ~527 by 2029.

Enrollment projection

484 students (2026)
~527 projected (2029)
at +2.9%/yr

Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools

School Type Size UC Reach Enroll. trend
Westside Preparatory Charter Public 484
Peer-group median 4.3% -8%
Norwood Junior High Public 488
Higher Learning Academy Public 501
Highlands Community Charter Public 487 -77%
Natomas Pacific Pathways Prep Elementary Public 503
Natomas Pacific Pathways Prep Middle Public 518
Martin Luther King Jr. Technology Academy Public 434
Aspire Alexander Twilight Secondary Academy Public 508 +218%
Futures High School Public 394 4.3% -13%
Marconi Learning Academy Public 438 +222%
Heritage Peak Charter School Public 344 -8%

UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →

Is your school winning the families it should?

An Enrollment Trend Audit benchmarks your enrollment against nearby schools, shows who's gaining and losing families, and lays out a plan to make families choose you — built around the outcomes your families value. Built for principals, heads of school, and district leaders.

Request an Enrollment Trend Audit →