Valley High (continuation)

· Alameda County · Dublin Unified
Public Alameda County 🏛 Dublin Unified → CDS 0175093…
📄 Shareable scorecard →

Compare with peers

Most similar nearby schools

Del Amigo High (continuation) → Vineyard Alternative School → Vista Alternative → Bridgepoint High → Del Valle Continuation High → Compare all similar →

No UC admissions data on file for Valley High (continuation).

This school doesn't appear in UCOP's source-school records (it may send few or no applicants to UC). Its enrollment trend and similar-school comparison are still below.

Enrollment trend & projection

Total enrollment (9–12)
56 (2018)45 (2026)
-19.6%
Grade 12 (graduating class)
33 (2018)30 (2026)
-9.1%

If this trend holds (-2.7%/yr, Total enrollment)

At per-pupil funding of $ / student:

Horizon Projected Total enrollment Change Funding impact / yr
1 yr (2027) ~44 -1 $0
3 yr (2029) ~41 -4 $0
5 yr (2031) ~39 -6 $0

Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.

Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25

Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the Alameda County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.

Critical
Bleeding from both ends.

Enrollment down 9.1% vs. county +0.6%, AND stability (51.8%) below the county median. Fewer families are choosing the school, and the ones who do aren't staying through year-end. Chronic absenteeism is also at 79.2% (up +11.5 pts from 2016-17) — engagement and demand are both signaling decline.

-9.1%  school enrollment (2018–2026)
+0.6%  Alameda County baseline
-9.7pp  gap vs. county
51.8%  retention (county median 89.9%)
Enrollment — indexed to 100 at 2018
Stability rate by year (raw %)
Stability rate
51.8%
29 of 56 students

27 of 56 students who enrolled at Valley High (continuation) this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (48.2% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.

Alameda County median
89.9% · school is in the 16th percentile of 70 HS
Statewide median
87.2% · in the 18th percentile of 1,688 HS

Stability by student group

Socio. disadvantaged (30) 50.0%
Hispanic / Latino (25) 56.0%

Nearest peer high schools

Del Amigo High (continuation) 32.2% Vineyard Alternative School 65.3% Vista Alternative 31.6% Bridgepoint High 58.8% Del Valle Continuation High 30.1%

Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.

Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25

Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: grades 9–12.

Chronic absent
79.2%
42 of 53 students

Absenteeism is up 11.5 pp since 2016-17. A rising absenteeism trend often precedes formal departure — worth investigating which subgroups are driving it.

Alameda County median
25.4% · school is worse than 91% of 69 HS
Statewide median
22.9%
Chronic absenteeism by year (raw %)

Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).

SBAC academic outcomes — grade 11, 2025

Share of grade-11 students meeting or exceeding the California standard on Smarter Balanced ELA and Math. This is the academic-readiness signal that pairs with UC Reach (post-grad outcomes), stability (retention), and absenteeism (engagement). Note: statewide median Math is only ~20% — a school at 20% isn't an outlier; one at 45%+ genuinely is.

ELA — met or exceeded
n = 24
8.3%
incl. 0.0% exceeded
-47.1 pts vs. Alameda County median (55.4%) · CA median 54.3% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 79.3%
Math — met or exceeded
n = 24
0.0%
incl. 0.0% exceeded
-24.2 pts vs. Alameda County median (24.2%) · CA median 21.1% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 53.6%

Source: California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) Smarter Balanced research files. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥30 tested students.

Student composition — 2025-26

HS grades 9–12 racial/ethnic composition and program subgroups, from CDE Census Day Enrollment. Two-year shift shown when ≥1 pt — surfaces how the community served has changed since 2023-24.

Race / ethnicity

Hispanic / Latino 42% +6.0
Black / African Am. 18% +5.0
White 16% -7.8
Two or more 13% +2.7
Asian 11% -1.7

Program subgroups

Students w/ disabilities 58% +25.9

Source: California Department of Education, Census Day Enrollment 2025-26 (HS grades 9–12). Δ shown when shift is ≥1 pt since 2023-24. Categories below 0.5% omitted.

District financial profile — Dublin Unified (FY2020)

From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.

Total revenue
$217.5M
+30.3% since FY2017
Per-pupil revenue
$17,223
12,625 students enrolled
Revenue mix
State: 44.9%
Local: 51.5%
Federal: 3.6%
Instruction share
60.7%
of current spending · $7,512/pupil
Long-term debt
$541.7M
+23.9% since FY2017
Total revenue by year ($M)
Total expenditure by year ($M)

Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the Dublin Unified as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).

Valley High (continuation) — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot

Public · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools

  • Senior-class enrollment is down 9% (33→30 from 2018 to 2026), outpacing the peer-group median of -17%.
  • At its recent rate (-2.7%/yr), enrollment projects to ~41 by 2029 — about 4 fewer students than today.

Enrollment projection

45 students (2026)
~41 projected (2029)
at -2.7%/yr

That's about 4 fewer students. At per-student funding of $ per student, that's roughly $0 in annual state funding at risk.

Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423 per ADA) — adjust to your district's actual per-pupil figure. Projection extrapolates the recent annual rate — not a forecast of intent.

Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools

School Type Size UC Reach Enroll. trend
Valley High (continuation) Public 45 -9%
Peer-group median -17%
Del Amigo High (continuation) Public 39 -16%
Vineyard Alternative School Public 57 -37%
Vista Alternative Public 47 -10%
Bridgepoint High Public 52 -22%
Del Valle Continuation High Public 83 -19%
Village High Public 104 +22%
Redwood Continuation High Public 87 -13%
Royal Sunset (continuation) Public 99 -26%
Core Learning Academy At Conley-Caraballo High Public 111 -34%
Alternatives in Action Hs Public 86 +440%

UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →

Is your school winning the families it should?

An Enrollment Trend Audit benchmarks your enrollment against nearby schools, shows who's gaining and losing families, and lays out a plan to make families choose you — built around the outcomes your families value. Built for principals, heads of school, and district leaders.

Request an Enrollment Trend Audit →