Bridgepoint High

· Alameda County · Newark Unified
Public Alameda County 🏛 Newark Unified → CDS 0161234…
📄 Shareable scorecard →

Compare with peers

Most similar nearby schools

Vista Alternative → Valley High (continuation) → Milpitas Middle College Hs → Oxford Day Academy → Alta Vista High → Compare all similar →

No UC admissions data on file for Bridgepoint High.

This school doesn't appear in UCOP's source-school records (it may send few or no applicants to UC). Its enrollment trend and similar-school comparison are still below.

Enrollment trend & projection

Total enrollment (9–12)
62 (2018)52 (2026)
-16.1%
Grade 12 (graduating class)
40 (2018)31 (2026)
-22.5%

If this trend holds (-2.2%/yr, Total enrollment)

At per-pupil funding of $ / student:

Horizon Projected Total enrollment Change Funding impact / yr
1 yr (2027) ~51 -1 $0
3 yr (2029) ~49 -3 $0
5 yr (2031) ~47 -5 $0

Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.

Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25

Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the Alameda County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.

Critical
Compounding decline on both vectors.

Enrollment -22.5% vs. county +0.6% AND stability (58.8%) below the county median. Recruitment and retention both under pressure — likely a foundational rather than tactical problem. Chronic absenteeism is also at 60.5% (up +0.9 pts from 2016-17) — engagement and demand are both signaling decline.

-22.5%  school enrollment (2018–2026)
+0.6%  Alameda County baseline
-23.1pp  gap vs. county
58.8%  retention (county median 89.9%)
Enrollment — indexed to 100 at 2018
Stability rate by year (raw %)
Stability rate
58.8%
50 of 85 students

35 of 85 students who enrolled at Bridgepoint High this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (41.2% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.

Alameda County median
89.9% · school is in the 17th percentile of 70 HS
Statewide median
87.2% · in the 21st percentile of 1,688 HS

Stability by student group

Socio. disadvantaged (66) 59.1%
Hispanic / Latino (63) 63.5%
English learners (31) 61.3%
Students w/ disabilities (28) 71.4%

Nearest peer high schools

Vista Alternative 31.6% Valley High (continuation) 51.8% Milpitas Middle College Hs 71.2% Oxford Day Academy 82.8% Alta Vista High 49.0%

Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.

Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25

Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: grades 9–12.

Chronic absent
60.5%
46 of 76 students

Roughly one in three students is chronically absent. A floor this high signals systemic engagement problems beyond what any single intervention can fix.

Alameda County median
25.4% · school is worse than 81% of 69 HS
Statewide median
22.9%
Chronic absenteeism by year (raw %)

Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).

SBAC academic outcomes — grade 11, 2025

Share of grade-11 students meeting or exceeding the California standard on Smarter Balanced ELA and Math. This is the academic-readiness signal that pairs with UC Reach (post-grad outcomes), stability (retention), and absenteeism (engagement). Note: statewide median Math is only ~20% — a school at 20% isn't an outlier; one at 45%+ genuinely is.

ELA — met or exceeded
n = 14
0.0%
incl. 0.0% exceeded
-55.4 pts vs. Alameda County median (55.4%) · CA median 54.3% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 79.3%
Math — met or exceeded
n = 14
0.0%
incl. 0.0% exceeded
-24.2 pts vs. Alameda County median (24.2%) · CA median 21.1% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 53.6%

Source: California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) Smarter Balanced research files. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥30 tested students.

Student composition — 2025-26

HS grades 9–12 racial/ethnic composition and program subgroups, from CDE Census Day Enrollment. Two-year shift shown when ≥1 pt — surfaces how the community served has changed since 2023-24.

Race / ethnicity

Hispanic / Latino 69% +3.6
White 17% +10.0
Filipino 6%
Asian 2% -5.4
Black / African Am. 2% -2.3
Two or more 2% -1.2
Not reported 2%

Program subgroups

Students w/ disabilities 31% -39.0
Socioeconomically disadv. 23% -2.9

Source: California Department of Education, Census Day Enrollment 2025-26 (HS grades 9–12). Δ shown when shift is ≥1 pt since 2023-24. Categories below 0.5% omitted.

District financial profile — Newark Unified (FY2020)

From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.

Total revenue
$95.3M
+16.4% since FY2017
Per-pupil revenue
$17,313
5,507 students enrolled
Revenue mix
State: 37.5%
Local: 51.3%
Federal: 11.2%
Instruction share
54.9%
of current spending · $7,346/pupil
Long-term debt
$99.0M
-13.9% since FY2017
Total revenue by year ($M)
Total expenditure by year ($M)

Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the Newark Unified as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).

Bridgepoint High — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot

Public · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools

  • Senior-class enrollment is down 22% (40→31 from 2018 to 2026), trailing the peer-group median of -12%.
  • At its recent rate (-2.2%/yr), enrollment projects to ~49 by 2029 — about 3 fewer students than today.

Enrollment projection

52 students (2026)
~49 projected (2029)
at -2.2%/yr

That's about 3 fewer students. At per-student funding of $ per student, that's roughly $0 in annual state funding at risk.

Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423 per ADA) — adjust to your district's actual per-pupil figure. Projection extrapolates the recent annual rate — not a forecast of intent.

Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools

School Type Size UC Reach Enroll. trend
Bridgepoint High Public 52 -22%
Peer-group median 20.0% -12%
Vista Alternative Public 47 -10%
Valley High (continuation) Public 45 -9%
Milpitas Middle College Hs Public 73 20.0% +56%
Oxford Day Academy Public 82 +60%
Alta Vista High Public 74 -33%
Core Learning Academy At Conley-Caraballo High Public 111 -34%
Crossroads High (alternative) Public 18 -65%
Redwood Continuation High Public 87 -13%
Royal Sunset (continuation) Public 99 -26%
Village High Public 104 +22%

UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →

Is your school winning the families it should?

An Enrollment Trend Audit benchmarks your enrollment against nearby schools, shows who's gaining and losing families, and lays out a plan to make families choose you — built around the outcomes your families value. Built for principals, heads of school, and district leaders.

Request an Enrollment Trend Audit →