Elm High

· Fresno County · Washington Unified
Public Fresno County 🏛 Washington Unified → CDS 1076778…
📄 Shareable scorecard →

Compare with peers

Most similar nearby schools

Violet Heintz Education Academy → Enterprise High → San Joaquin Valley High → Easton Continuation High → Independence Continuation High → Compare all similar →

No UC admissions data on file for Elm High.

This school doesn't appear in UCOP's source-school records (it may send few or no applicants to UC). Its enrollment trend and similar-school comparison are still below.

Enrollment trend & projection

Total enrollment (9–12)
92 (2018)47 (2026)
-48.9%
Grade 12 (graduating class)
47 (2018)19 (2026)
-59.6%

If this trend holds (-8.1%/yr, Total enrollment)

At per-pupil funding of $ / student:

Horizon Projected Total enrollment Change Funding impact / yr
1 yr (2027) ~43 -4 $0
3 yr (2029) ~37 -10 $0
5 yr (2031) ~31 -16 $0

Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.

Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25

Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the Fresno County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.

Critical
Compounding decline on both vectors.

Enrollment -59.6% vs. county +6.7% AND stability (15.3%) below the county median. Recruitment and retention both under pressure — likely a foundational rather than tactical problem. Chronic absenteeism is also at 86.3% (up +53.9 pts from 2016-17) — engagement and demand are both signaling decline.

-59.6%  school enrollment (2018–2026)
+6.7%  Fresno County baseline
-66.3pp  gap vs. county
15.3%  retention (county median 85.0%)
Enrollment — indexed to 100 at 2018
Stability rate by year (raw %)
Stability rate
15.3%
18 of 118 students

100 of 118 students who enrolled at Elm High this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (84.7% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.

Fresno County median
85.0% · school is in the 2nd percentile of 55 HS
Statewide median
87.2% · in the 1st percentile of 1,688 HS

Stability by student group

Socio. disadvantaged (107) 16.8%
Hispanic / Latino (104) 14.4%
English learners (23) 8.7%

Nearest peer high schools

Violet Heintz Education Academy 20.7% Enterprise High 45.3% San Joaquin Valley High 24.1% Easton Continuation High 16.7% Independence Continuation High 40.0%

Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.

Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25

Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: grades 9–12.

Chronic absent
86.3%
88 of 102 students

Absenteeism is up 53.9 pp since 2016-17. A rising absenteeism trend often precedes formal departure — worth investigating which subgroups are driving it.

Fresno County median
21.5% · school is worse than 96% of 55 HS
Statewide median
22.9%
Chronic absenteeism by year (raw %)

Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).

SBAC academic outcomes — grade 11, 2025

Share of grade-11 students meeting or exceeding the California standard on Smarter Balanced ELA and Math. This is the academic-readiness signal that pairs with UC Reach (post-grad outcomes), stability (retention), and absenteeism (engagement). Note: statewide median Math is only ~20% — a school at 20% isn't an outlier; one at 45%+ genuinely is.

ELA — met or exceeded
n = 26
11.5%
incl. 3.9% exceeded
-43.7 pts vs. Fresno County median (55.2%) · CA median 54.3% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 79.3%
Math — met or exceeded
n = 26
11.5%
incl. 7.7% exceeded
-6.6 pts vs. Fresno County median (18.1%) · CA median 21.1% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 53.6%

Source: California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) Smarter Balanced research files. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥30 tested students.

Student composition — 2025-26

HS grades 9–12 racial/ethnic composition and program subgroups, from CDE Census Day Enrollment. Two-year shift shown when ≥1 pt — surfaces how the community served has changed since 2023-24.

Race / ethnicity

Hispanic / Latino 85% +2.8
White 6% -1.2
Black / African Am. 6% +1.3
Asian 2% -1.7

Program subgroups

Students w/ disabilities 96% +28.6

Source: California Department of Education, Census Day Enrollment 2025-26 (HS grades 9–12). Δ shown when shift is ≥1 pt since 2023-24. Categories below 0.5% omitted.

District financial profile — Washington Unified (FY2020)

From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.

Total revenue
$47.3M
-5.4% since FY2017
Per-pupil revenue
$18,516
2,557 students enrolled
Revenue mix
State: 65.6%
Local: 18.6%
Federal: 15.8%
Instruction share
55.1%
of current spending · $8,264/pupil
Long-term debt
$43.7M
+63.5% since FY2017
Total revenue by year ($M)
Total expenditure by year ($M)

Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the Washington Unified as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).

Elm High — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot

Public · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools

  • Senior-class enrollment is down 60% (47→19 from 2018 to 2026), trailing the peer-group median of +23%.
  • At its recent rate (-8.1%/yr), enrollment projects to ~37 by 2029 — about 10 fewer students than today.

Enrollment projection

47 students (2026)
~37 projected (2029)
at -8.1%/yr

That's about 10 fewer students. At per-student funding of $ per student, that's roughly $0 in annual state funding at risk.

Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423 per ADA) — adjust to your district's actual per-pupil figure. Projection extrapolates the recent annual rate — not a forecast of intent.

Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools

School Type Size UC Reach Enroll. trend
Elm High Public 47 -60%
Peer-group median +23%
Violet Heintz Education Academy Public 32 -62%
Enterprise High Public 52 -25%
San Joaquin Valley High Public 55 +33%
Easton Continuation High Public 18 +75%
Independence Continuation High Public 50 +162%
Oasis Continuation High Public 58 +62%
Kings River High (continuation) Public 71 -12%
Pershing Continuation High Public 105 -15%
Heartland High (continuation) Public 95 +29%
Fowler Academy Continuation Public 16 +17%

UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →

Is your school winning the families it should?

An Enrollment Trend Audit benchmarks your enrollment against nearby schools, shows who's gaining and losing families, and lays out a plan to make families choose you — built around the outcomes your families value. Built for principals, heads of school, and district leaders.

Request an Enrollment Trend Audit →