Pittman Charter

· San Joaquin County · Stockton Unified
Public San Joaquin County 🏛 Stockton Unified → CDS 3968676…
📄 Shareable scorecard →

Compare with peers

Most similar nearby schools

Team Charter → Stockton Early College Academy → Aspire Langston Hughes Academy → Aspire Port City Academy → Aspire Benjamin Holt College Preparatory Academy → Compare all similar →

No UC admissions data on file for Pittman Charter.

This school doesn't appear in UCOP's source-school records (it may send few or no applicants to UC). Its enrollment trend and similar-school comparison are still below.

Enrollment trend & projection

Total enrollment
685 (2018)603 (2026)
-12.0%

If this trend holds (-1.6%/yr, Total enrollment)

At per-pupil funding of $ / student:

Horizon Projected Total enrollment Change Funding impact / yr
1 yr (2027) ~593 -10 $0
3 yr (2029) ~575 -28 $0
5 yr (2031) ~557 -46 $0

Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.

Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25

Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the San Joaquin County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.

Stability rate
92.8%
591 of 637 students

46 of 637 students who enrolled at Pittman Charter this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (7.2% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.

San Joaquin County median
87.1% · school is in the 75th percentile of 67 HS
Statewide median
88.7% · in the 75th percentile of 2,648 HS

Stability by student group

Hispanic / Latino (571) 93.5%
Socio. disadvantaged (565) 93.6%
English learners (257) 91.4%
Students w/ disabilities (72) 91.7%
Black / African Am. (35) 85.7%

Nearest peer high schools

Team Charter 84.8% Stockton Early College Academy 99.5% Aspire Langston Hughes Academy 90.1% Aspire Port City Academy 94.6% Aspire Benjamin Holt College Preparatory Academy 95.8%

Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.

Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25

Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: total enrollment.

Chronic absent
20.4%
128 of 627 students

Absenteeism is in the typical CA HS range. Worth monitoring alongside the demand and retention signals above.

San Joaquin County median
21.6% · school is better than 55% of 67 HS
Statewide median
20.9%
Chronic absenteeism by year (raw %)

Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).

District financial profile — Stockton Unified (FY2020)

From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.

Total revenue
$693.2M
+25.1% since FY2017
Per-pupil revenue
$19,153
36,190 students enrolled
Revenue mix
State: 67.3%
Local: 17.4%
Federal: 15.4%
Instruction share
54.4%
of current spending · $8,960/pupil
Long-term debt
$435.3M
+2.5% since FY2017
Total revenue by year ($M)
Total expenditure by year ($M)

Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the Stockton Unified as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).

Pittman Charter — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot

Public · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools

  • At its recent rate (-1.6%/yr), enrollment projects to ~575 by 2029 — about 28 fewer students than today.

Enrollment projection

603 students (2026)
~575 projected (2029)
at -1.6%/yr

That's about 28 fewer students. At per-student funding of $ per student, that's roughly $0 in annual state funding at risk.

Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423 per ADA) — adjust to your district's actual per-pupil figure. Projection extrapolates the recent annual rate — not a forecast of intent.

Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools

School Type Size UC Reach Enroll. trend
Pittman Charter Public 603
Peer-group median 37.3% +25%
Team Charter Public 469
Stockton Early College Academy Public 446 64.2% +14%
Aspire Langston Hughes Academy Public 809 28.7% +36%
Aspire Port City Academy Public 444
Aspire Benjamin Holt College Preparatory Academy Public 698 +129%
Health Careers Academy Hs Public 407 37.3% -11%
John Mccandless Charter Public 437
Aspire Arts & Sciences Academy Public 441
Aspire River Oaks Charter Public 451
Aspire Rosa Parks Academy Public 401

UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →

Is your school winning the families it should?

An Enrollment Trend Audit benchmarks your enrollment against nearby schools, shows who's gaining and losing families, and lays out a plan to make families choose you — built around the outcomes your families value. Built for principals, heads of school, and district leaders.

Request an Enrollment Trend Audit →