Paradise Charter Middle

· Butte County · Paradise Unified
Public Butte County 🏛 Paradise Unified → CDS 0461531…
📄 Shareable scorecard →

Compare with peers

Most similar nearby schools

Hometech Charter → Achieve Charter School Of Paradise Inc. → Children's Community Charter → Paradise Junior High → Forest Ranch Charter → Compare all similar →

No UC admissions data on file for Paradise Charter Middle.

This school doesn't appear in UCOP's source-school records (it may send few or no applicants to UC). Its enrollment trend and similar-school comparison are still below.

Enrollment trend & projection

Total enrollment
158 (2018)145 (2026)
-8.2%

If this trend holds (-1.1%/yr, Total enrollment)

At per-pupil funding of $ / student:

Horizon Projected Total enrollment Change Funding impact / yr
1 yr (2027) ~143 -2 $0
3 yr (2029) ~140 -5 $0
5 yr (2031) ~137 -8 $0

Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.

Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25

Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the Butte County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.

Stability rate
90.8%
138 of 152 students

14 of 152 students who enrolled at Paradise Charter Middle this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (9.2% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.

Butte County median
85.4% · school is in the 84th percentile of 25 HS
Statewide median
88.7% · in the 63rd percentile of 2,648 HS

Stability by student group

White (119) 92.4%
Socio. disadvantaged (84) 86.9%
Students w/ disabilities (29) 82.8%

Nearest peer high schools

Hometech Charter 55.5% Achieve Charter School Of Paradise Inc. 74.6% Children's Community Charter 86.0% Paradise Junior High 73.7% Forest Ranch Charter 83.9%

Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.

Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25

Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: total enrollment.

Chronic absent
20.8%
31 of 149 students

Absenteeism is up 11.2 pp since 2016-17. A rising absenteeism trend often precedes formal departure — worth investigating which subgroups are driving it.

Butte County median
20.8% · school is worse than 48% of 25 HS
Statewide median
20.9%
Chronic absenteeism by year (raw %)

Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).

District financial profile — Paradise Unified (FY2020)

From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.

Total revenue
$52.2M
+12.0% since FY2017
Per-pupil revenue
$34,081
1,533 students enrolled
Revenue mix
State: 68.1%
Local: 15.7%
Federal: 16.3%
Instruction share
59.8%
of current spending · $12,235/pupil
Long-term debt
$10.0M
+1932.5% since FY2017
Total revenue by year ($M)
Total expenditure by year ($M)

Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the Paradise Unified as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).

Paradise Charter Middle — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot

Public · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools

  • At its recent rate (-1.1%/yr), enrollment projects to ~140 by 2029 — about 5 fewer students than today.

Enrollment projection

145 students (2026)
~140 projected (2029)
at -1.1%/yr

That's about 5 fewer students. At per-student funding of $ per student, that's roughly $0 in annual state funding at risk.

Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423 per ADA) — adjust to your district's actual per-pupil figure. Projection extrapolates the recent annual rate — not a forecast of intent.

Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools

School Type Size UC Reach Enroll. trend
Paradise Charter Middle Public 145
Peer-group median 7.8% -20%
Hometech Charter Public 145 +41%
Achieve Charter School Of Paradise Inc. Public 169
Children's Community Charter Public 220
Paradise Junior High Public 223
Forest Ranch Charter Public 105
Blue Oak Charter Public 197
Ridgeview High (continuation) Public 56 -37%
Fair View High (continuation) Public 100 -20%
Paradise High School Public 502 3.0% -46%
Inspire School Of Arts And Sciences Public 299 12.5% -18%

UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →

Is your school winning the families it should?

An Enrollment Trend Audit benchmarks your enrollment against nearby schools, shows who's gaining and losing families, and lays out a plan to make families choose you — built around the outcomes your families value. Built for principals, heads of school, and district leaders.

Request an Enrollment Trend Audit →