Palomar High

· San Diego County · Sweetwater Union High
Public San Diego County 🏛 Sweetwater Union High → CDS 3768411…
📄 Shareable scorecard →

Compare with peers

Most similar nearby schools

Maac Community Charter → King-Chavez Community High → Urban Corps Of San Diego County Charter → Twain High → Jcs Manzanita → Compare all similar →

No UC admissions data on file for Palomar High.

This school doesn't appear in UCOP's source-school records (it may send few or no applicants to UC). Its enrollment trend and similar-school comparison are still below.

Enrollment trend & projection

Total enrollment (9–12)
273 (2018)222 (2026)
-18.7%
Grade 12 (graduating class)
223 (2018)177 (2026)
-20.6%

If this trend holds (-2.6%/yr, Total enrollment)

At per-pupil funding of $ / student:

Horizon Projected Total enrollment Change Funding impact / yr
1 yr (2027) ~216 -6 $0
3 yr (2029) ~205 -17 $0
5 yr (2031) ~195 -27 $0

Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.

Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25

Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the San Diego County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.

Critical
Compounding decline on both vectors.

Enrollment -20.6% vs. county -7.8% AND stability (42.6%) below the county median. Recruitment and retention both under pressure — likely a foundational rather than tactical problem. Chronic absenteeism is also at 82.5% (up +72.9 pts from 2016-17) — engagement and demand are both signaling decline.

-20.6%  school enrollment (2018–2026)
-7.8%  San Diego County baseline
-12.8pp  gap vs. county
42.6%  retention (county median 88.5%)
Enrollment — indexed to 100 at 2018
Stability rate by year (raw %)
Stability rate
42.6%
187 of 439 students

252 of 439 students who enrolled at Palomar High this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (57.4% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.

San Diego County median
88.5% · school is in the 9th percentile of 121 HS
Statewide median
87.2% · in the 14th percentile of 1,688 HS

Stability by student group

Hispanic / Latino (350) 40.9%
Socio. disadvantaged (340) 47.6%
English learners (148) 41.2%
Students w/ disabilities (103) 47.6%
White (47) 55.3%

Nearest peer high schools

Maac Community Charter 40.1% King-Chavez Community High 85.5% Urban Corps Of San Diego County Charter 43.0% Twain High 39.3% Jcs Manzanita 75.0%

Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.

Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25

Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: grades 9–12.

Chronic absent
82.5%
334 of 405 students

Absenteeism is up 72.9 pp since 2016-17. A rising absenteeism trend often precedes formal departure — worth investigating which subgroups are driving it.

San Diego County median
18.9% · school is worse than 97% of 117 HS
Statewide median
22.9%
Chronic absenteeism by year (raw %)

Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).

SBAC academic outcomes — grade 11, 2025

Share of grade-11 students meeting or exceeding the California standard on Smarter Balanced ELA and Math. This is the academic-readiness signal that pairs with UC Reach (post-grad outcomes), stability (retention), and absenteeism (engagement). Note: statewide median Math is only ~20% — a school at 20% isn't an outlier; one at 45%+ genuinely is.

ELA — met or exceeded
n = 101
9.9%
incl. 1.0% exceeded
-50.7 pts vs. San Diego County median (60.6%) · CA median 54.3% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 79.3%
Math — met or exceeded
n = 102
1.0%
incl. 0.0% exceeded
-23.4 pts vs. San Diego County median (24.4%) · CA median 21.1% · Top 10% statewide ≥ 53.6%

Source: California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) Smarter Balanced research files. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥30 tested students.

Student composition — 2025-26

HS grades 9–12 racial/ethnic composition and program subgroups, from CDE Census Day Enrollment. Two-year shift shown when ≥1 pt — surfaces how the community served has changed since 2023-24.

Race / ethnicity

Hispanic / Latino 85% +2.2
White 8% +1.4
Black / African Am. 3% -1.1
Two or more 2% -1.2
Filipino 1%
Asian 0%
American Indian 0%

Program subgroups

Students w/ disabilities 90% +3.5
English learners 39% +5.1
Socioeconomically disadv. 22% -3.1

Source: California Department of Education, Census Day Enrollment 2025-26 (HS grades 9–12). Δ shown when shift is ≥1 pt since 2023-24. Categories below 0.5% omitted.

District financial profile — Sweetwater Union High (FY2020)

From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.

Total revenue
$646.0M
+11.4% since FY2017
Per-pupil revenue
$17,430
37,060 students enrolled
Revenue mix
State: 58.9%
Local: 32.0%
Federal: 9.1%
Instruction share
53.4%
of current spending · $7,362/pupil
Long-term debt
$482.5M
+22.4% since FY2017
Total revenue by year ($M)
Total expenditure by year ($M)

Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the Sweetwater Union High as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).

Palomar High — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot

Public · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools

  • Senior-class enrollment is down 21% (223→177 from 2018 to 2026), outpacing the peer-group median of -38%.
  • At its recent rate (-2.6%/yr), enrollment projects to ~205 by 2029 — about 17 fewer students than today.

Enrollment projection

222 students (2026)
~205 projected (2029)
at -2.6%/yr

That's about 17 fewer students. At per-student funding of $ per student, that's roughly $0 in annual state funding at risk.

Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423 per ADA) — adjust to your district's actual per-pupil figure. Projection extrapolates the recent annual rate — not a forecast of intent.

Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools

School Type Size UC Reach Enroll. trend
Palomar High Public 222 -21%
Peer-group median 28.5% -38%
Maac Community Charter Public 151 -41%
King-Chavez Community High Public 255 4.8% -66%
Urban Corps Of San Diego County Charter Public 215 -60%
Twain High Public 236 -5%
Jcs Manzanita Public 245 -78%
Garfield High Public 164 -36%
Urban Discovery Academy Charter Public 310 -33%
America's Finest Charter Public 334 -6%
East Village Middle College Hs Public 158 52.2% +33%
Diego Hills Central Public Charter Public 301 -54%

UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →

Is your school winning the families it should?

An Enrollment Trend Audit benchmarks your enrollment against nearby schools, shows who's gaining and losing families, and lays out a plan to make families choose you — built around the outcomes your families value. Built for principals, heads of school, and district leaders.

Request an Enrollment Trend Audit →