East Village Middle College Hs
📄 Shareable scorecard →Compare with peers
Most similar nearby schools
Garfield High → City Heights Preparatory Charter → Maac Community Charter → Urban Corps Of San Diego County Charter → Learning Choice Academy → Compare all similar →Enrollment trend & projection
If this trend holds (+6.8%/yr, Total enrollment)
At per-pupil funding of $ / student:
| Horizon | Projected Total enrollment | Change | Funding impact / yr |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 yr (2027) | ~169 | +11 | $0 |
| 3 yr (2029) | ~193 | +35 | $0 |
| 5 yr (2031) | ~220 | +62 | $0 |
Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.
Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25
Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the San Diego County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.
East Village Middle College Hs outperformed San Diego County on enrollment (school +33.3% vs. county -7.8%) AND maintains 95.1% stability. Replicable model — worth documenting what's working.
7 of 142 students who enrolled at East Village Middle College Hs this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (4.9% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.
Stability by student group
Nearest peer high schools
Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.
Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25
Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: grades 9–12.
Low and stable absenteeism — students are engaged and showing up. The leading indicator is healthy.
Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).
SBAC academic outcomes — grade 11, 2025
Share of grade-11 students meeting or exceeding the California standard on Smarter Balanced ELA and Math. This is the academic-readiness signal that pairs with UC Reach (post-grad outcomes), stability (retention), and absenteeism (engagement). Note: statewide median Math is only ~20% — a school at 20% isn't an outlier; one at 45%+ genuinely is.
Source: California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) Smarter Balanced research files. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥30 tested students.
Student composition — 2025-26
HS grades 9–12 racial/ethnic composition and program subgroups, from CDE Census Day Enrollment. Two-year shift shown when ≥1 pt — surfaces how the community served has changed since 2023-24.
Race / ethnicity
Program subgroups
Source: California Department of Education, Census Day Enrollment 2025-26 (HS grades 9–12). Δ shown when shift is ≥1 pt since 2023-24. Categories below 0.5% omitted.
District financial profile — San Diego Unified (FY2020)
From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.
Local: 65.2%
Federal: 10.6%
Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the San Diego Unified as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).
+44.5 pp above peer median (7.7%) · Ranked #1 of 3 similar schools
18.5%
7.7%
53.3%
52.2%
Higher than 90% of California high schools (1105 ranked, ≥50 seniors)
East Village Middle College Hs's UC Reach of 52.2% is in the top quartile statewide (median 18.5%; top 25% bar 32.0%) — but it's still below the top-10% bar of 53.3%.
Against similar schools, East Village Middle College Hs stands out clearly — the peer-group median is 7.7%.
For context, the elite tier (top 1%) clears 102.7% — a gap of 50 pp from where this school sits.
Overall, East Village Middle College Hs's UC Reach is higher than 90% of California high schools (1105 ranked).
East Village Middle College Hs — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot
Public · San Diego · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools
- ▸On UC Reach, East Village Middle College Hs sits near the top of its similar-school group (ranked #1 of 3): 52% vs. a peer median of 8%.
- ▸Its UC Reach has risen 23 points since 2021.
- ▸Senior-class enrollment is up 33% (24→32 from 2018 to 2026), outpacing the peer-group median of -34%.
- ▸Enrollment has been growing (+6.8%/yr); projects to ~193 by 2029.
Enrollment projection
Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools
| School | Type | Size | UC Reach | Enroll. trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| East Village Middle College Hs | Public | 158 | 52.2% | +33% |
| Peer-group median | 7.7% | -34% | ||
| Garfield High | Public | 164 | — | -36% |
| City Heights Preparatory Charter | Public | 157 | — | +175% |
| Maac Community Charter | Public | 151 | — | -41% |
| Urban Corps Of San Diego County Charter | Public | 215 | — | -60% |
| Learning Choice Academy | Public | 179 | — | -84% |
| King-Chavez Community High | Public | 255 | 4.8% | -66% |
| Twain High | Public | 236 | — | -5% |
| Urban Discovery Academy Charter | Public | 310 | — | -33% |
| Palomar High | Public | 222 | — | -21% |
| E3 Civic High | Public | 344 | 10.5% | -7% |
UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →
Admit rate vs. CA peer average, by campus ⓘ
How does this school's admit rate at each UC compare to other CA schools whose applicant pool averages the same GPA?
| Campus | Applicant GPA (avg) | Actual admit rate | CA peer avg | Δ | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UC Berkeley | 4.09 | 37.5% | 14.4% | +23.1pp | Over |
| UC San Diego | 3.97 | 50.0% | 20.6% | +29.4pp | Over |
| UC Santa Barbara | 3.88 | 37.5% | 27.9% | +9.6pp | Over |
UC Outcomes Trend — 2020–2025
Class size from CDE grade 12 enrollment. Campus-level data — applicant/admit totals may count a student at multiple campuses more than once.
Campus Breakdown — 2025
| Campus | Applicants | Admits | Enrollees | Admit Rate | UC Reach | Yield | Avg GPA (App) | Avg GPA (Adm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UC Berkeley → Elite | 8 | 3 | — | 37.5% | 13.0% | — | 4.09 | — |
| UCLA → Elite | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | 4.01 | — |
| UC San Diego → Selective | 12 | 6 | — | 50.0% | 26.1% | — | 3.97 | 4.21 |
| UC Santa Barbara → Selective | 8 | 3 | — | 37.5% | 13.0% | — | 3.88 | — |