Pace Academy

· Shasta County · Enterprise Elementary
Public Shasta County 🏛 Enterprise Elementary → CDS 4569971…
📄 Shareable scorecard →

Compare with peers

Most similar nearby schools

Phoenix Charter Academy → Shasta Collegiate Academy → Oakview High (alternative) → Mountain Lakes High → Stellar Secondary Charter Hs → Compare all similar →

No UC admissions data on file for Pace Academy.

This school doesn't appear in UCOP's source-school records (it may send few or no applicants to UC). Its enrollment trend and similar-school comparison are still below.

Enrollment trend & projection

Total enrollment
83 (2018)37 (2026)
-55.4%

If this trend holds (-9.6%/yr, Total enrollment)

At per-pupil funding of $ / student:

Horizon Projected Total enrollment Change Funding impact / yr
1 yr (2027) ~33 -4 $0
3 yr (2029) ~27 -10 $0
5 yr (2031) ~22 -15 $0

Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.

Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25

Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the Shasta County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.

Stability rate
51.6%
33 of 64 students

31 of 64 students who enrolled at Pace Academy this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (48.4% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.

Shasta County median
81.9% · school is in the 17th percentile of 30 HS
Statewide median
88.7% · in the 12th percentile of 2,648 HS

Stability by student group

Socio. disadvantaged (57) 50.9%
White (34) 55.9%

Nearest peer high schools

Shasta Collegiate Academy 38.1% Oakview High (alternative) 50.0% Mountain Lakes High 36.8%

Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.

Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25

Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: total enrollment.

Chronic absent
55.9%
33 of 59 students

Absenteeism is up 22.0 pp since 2017-18. A rising absenteeism trend often precedes formal departure — worth investigating which subgroups are driving it.

Shasta County median
18.5% · school is worse than 87% of 30 HS
Statewide median
20.9%
Chronic absenteeism by year (raw %)

Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).

District financial profile — Enterprise Elementary (FY2020)

From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.

Total revenue
$62.1M
+20.8% since FY2017
Per-pupil revenue
$16,877
3,680 students enrolled
Revenue mix
State: 59.6%
Local: 20.4%
Federal: 20.0%
Instruction share
57.1%
of current spending · $7,778/pupil
Long-term debt
$34.2M
+74.2% since FY2017
Total revenue by year ($M)
Total expenditure by year ($M)

Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the Enterprise Elementary as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).

Pace Academy — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot

Public · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools

  • At its recent rate (-9.6%/yr), enrollment projects to ~27 by 2029 — about 10 fewer students than today.

Enrollment projection

37 students (2026)
~27 projected (2029)
at -9.6%/yr

That's about 10 fewer students. At per-student funding of $ per student, that's roughly $0 in annual state funding at risk.

Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423 per ADA) — adjust to your district's actual per-pupil figure. Projection extrapolates the recent annual rate — not a forecast of intent.

Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools

School Type Size UC Reach Enroll. trend
Pace Academy Public 37
Peer-group median -14%
Phoenix Charter Academy Public 19
Shasta Collegiate Academy Public 75 -48%
Oakview High (alternative) Public 64 -3%
Mountain Lakes High Public 64 +12%
Stellar Secondary Charter Hs Public
North Valley High Public 75 +0%
California Heritage Youthbuild Academy Ii Public 156 -55%
Anderson New Technology High Public 130 -26%
Rocky Point Charter Public 160
North State Aspire Academy Public 10

UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →

Is your school winning the families it should?

An Enrollment Trend Audit benchmarks your enrollment against nearby schools, shows who's gaining and losing families, and lays out a plan to make families choose you — built around the outcomes your families value. Built for principals, heads of school, and district leaders.

Request an Enrollment Trend Audit →