Compare with peers
Most similar nearby schools
Shasta Collegiate Academy → Mountain Lakes High → Alps View High (continuation) → Oakview High (alternative) → Tehama Oaks High → Compare all similar →No UC admissions data on file for Phoenix Charter Academy.
This school doesn't appear in UCOP's source-school records (it may send few or no applicants to UC). Its enrollment trend and similar-school comparison are still below.
Enrollment trend & projection
If this trend holds (+14.6%/yr, Total enrollment)
At per-pupil funding of $ / student:
| Horizon | Projected Total enrollment | Change | Funding impact / yr |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 yr (2023) | ~22 | +3 | $0 |
| 3 yr (2025) | ~29 | +10 | $0 |
| 5 yr (2027) | ~38 | +19 | $0 |
Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.
Phoenix Charter Academy — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot
Public · Redding · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools
- ▸Enrollment has been growing (+14.6%/yr); projects to ~29 by 2025.
Enrollment projection
Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools
| School | Type | Size | UC Reach | Enroll. trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phoenix Charter Academy | Public | 19 | — | — |
| Peer-group median | — | +0% | ||
| Shasta Collegiate Academy | Public | 75 | — | -48% |
| Mountain Lakes High | Public | 64 | — | +12% |
| Alps View High (continuation) | Public | 20 | — | +200% |
| Oakview High (alternative) | Public | 64 | — | -3% |
| Tehama Oaks High | Public | 13 | — | -67% |
| North Valley High | Public | 75 | — | +0% |
| Elk Creek High | Public | 22 | — | +0% |
| Academy For Change | Public | 25 | — | +300% |
| Mountain View High (continuation) | Public | 14 | — | -83% |
| Northern Summit Academy | Public | 3 | — | — |
UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →