Mountain Home Charter (alternative)

· Madera County · Yosemite Unified
Public Madera County 🏛 Yosemite Unified → CDS 2076414…
📄 Shareable scorecard →

Compare with peers

Most similar nearby schools

Yosemite High School → Glacier High School Charter → Minarets High School → Minarets Charter High School → Chawanakee Academy Charter → Compare all similar →

No UC admissions data on file for Mountain Home Charter (alternative).

This school doesn't appear in UCOP's source-school records (it may send few or no applicants to UC). Its enrollment trend and similar-school comparison are still below.

Enrollment trend & projection

Total enrollment
351 (2018)233 (2026)
-33.6%

If this trend holds (-5.0%/yr, Total enrollment)

At per-pupil funding of $ / student:

Horizon Projected Total enrollment Change Funding impact / yr
1 yr (2027) ~221 -12 $0
3 yr (2029) ~200 -33 $0
5 yr (2031) ~180 -53 $0

Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.

Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25

Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the Madera County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.

Stability rate
91.9%
204 of 222 students

18 of 222 students who enrolled at Mountain Home Charter (alternative) this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (8.1% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.

Madera County median
87.1% · school is in the 92nd percentile of 13 HS
Statewide median
88.7% · in the 70th percentile of 2,648 HS

Stability by student group

White (164) 95.1%
Socio. disadvantaged (98) 93.9%
Students w/ disabilities (34) 82.4%
Hispanic / Latino (29) 65.5%

Nearest peer high schools

Yosemite High School 82.0% Glacier High School Charter 77.4% Minarets High School 87.1% Minarets Charter High School 87.6% Chawanakee Academy Charter 65.4%

Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.

Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25

Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: total enrollment.

Chronic absent
0.9%
2 of 222 students

Low and stable absenteeism — students are engaged and showing up. The leading indicator is healthy.

Madera County median
29.1% · school is better than 100% of 13 HS
Statewide median
20.9%
Chronic absenteeism by year (raw %)

Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).

District financial profile — Yosemite Unified (FY2020)

From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.

Total revenue
$24.3M
-1.1% since FY2017
Per-pupil revenue
$17,813
1,364 students enrolled
Revenue mix
State: 44.9%
Local: 42.7%
Federal: 12.4%
Instruction share
48.4%
of current spending · $7,173/pupil
Long-term debt
$5.6M
-32.1% since FY2017
Total revenue by year ($M)
Total expenditure by year ($M)

Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the Yosemite Unified as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).

Mountain Home Charter (alternative) — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot

Public · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools

  • At its recent rate (-5.0%/yr), enrollment projects to ~200 by 2029 — about 33 fewer students than today.

Enrollment projection

233 students (2026)
~200 projected (2029)
at -5.0%/yr

That's about 33 fewer students. At per-student funding of $ per student, that's roughly $0 in annual state funding at risk.

Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423 per ADA) — adjust to your district's actual per-pupil figure. Projection extrapolates the recent annual rate — not a forecast of intent.

Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools

School Type Size UC Reach Enroll. trend
Mountain Home Charter (alternative) Public 233
Peer-group median 7.5% -23%
Yosemite High School Public 509 18.1% -37%
Glacier High School Charter Public 97 -23%
Minarets High School Public 296 +56%
Minarets Charter High School Public 173 +4%
Chawanakee Academy Charter Public 164 -43%
Sierra Junior High Public 173
Sierra High Public 358 7.5% -38%
Mariposa County High School Public 459 3.6% +45%
Ahwahnee High School Public 50 +156%
Gateway High (continuation) Public 220 -24%

UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →

Is your school winning the families it should?

An Enrollment Trend Audit benchmarks your enrollment against nearby schools, shows who's gaining and losing families, and lays out a plan to make families choose you — built around the outcomes your families value. Built for principals, heads of school, and district leaders.

Request an Enrollment Trend Audit →