Mckinleyville High School
Mckinleyville · Humboldt County · Northern Humboldt Union High · Public
📄 Shareable scorecard →Compare with peers
Most similar nearby schools
Alder Grove Charter School 2 → Arcata High School → Northern United - Humboldt Charter → Eureka Senior High → Eureka Senior High School → Compare all similar →📋 At a glance
- 📚 9 AP courses offered — Strong
- 🔢 3 calculus classes · 1 physics · 2 chemistry
- 🎓 AP rigor: 64th percentile nationally
- 🎓 4-yr grad rate: 90% (Bottom 49% of US high schools by 4-yr grad rate)
Composed from federal CRDC offerings, EDFacts ACGR, and other public data. Full breakdowns below.
How Mckinleyville High School compares for families
Real college outcomes data available below.
- ▸ Statewide2.5% UC Reach — 15.6 points below the California median of 18.1%.
- ▸ vs Similar SchoolsTrails the peer median (2.5% UC Reach vs 6.2% median) across the 5 most similar nearby schools.
🎓 Academic rigor
AP + advanced-course offerings
Strong — solid AP program + advanced courses
64th percentile nationally
Source: federal Civil Rights Data Collection (CRDC 2020-21). CRDC reports what's offered + enrolled — it doesn't collect AP exam pass rates (College Board owns that data and doesn't release it school-level).
SAT / ACT participation
CRDC federal data · 2020-21Source: federal Civil Rights Data Collection (CRDC 2020-21). Volume — not score — is what's reported here. A higher count means more students at this school are entering the college admissions pipeline. Note: 2020-21 was COVID-disrupted; some districts (especially those that stayed remote longer) report unusually low or zero takers.
🎓 4-year graduation rate · federal EDFacts
What % of students graduate on time?
Bottom 49% of US high schools by 4-yr grad rate
Source: federal EDFacts ACGR (Adjusted Cohort Graduation Rate), 2019 vintage via Urban Institute. EDFacts publishes a range (low-high) to preserve privacy on small cohorts; we display the midpoint.
🏛️ Federal Title I context
Title I Schoolwide eligible
≥40% FRPL — qualifies for Title I Schoolwide program
40-74% of students qualify for free/reduced lunch. The district can use Title I funds across the whole school under federal Schoolwide Program rules.
Source: NCES Common Core of Data, free/reduced-price lunch eligibility. The actual Title I designation is a district decision and may differ from eligibility — but the federal eligibility math is what we show here. We don't claim to assert whether the district formally chose to enroll this school in Title I.
Mckinleyville High School sent 20 applications to the six most selective University of California campuses and 15.0% were admitted, producing a UC Reach of 2.5% — 15.6 percentage points below the California median of 18.1%, higher than 1% of California high schools..
-3.7 pp vs. peer median (6.2%) · Ranked #8 of 8 similar schools
18.1%
6.2%
51.2%
2.5%
Higher than 1% of California high schools (978 ranked, ≥50 seniors)
Mckinleyville High School's UC Reach of 2.5% is below the California median (18.1%). The top 10% of CA schools achieve 51.2% or higher.
Overall, Mckinleyville High School's UC Reach is higher than 1% of California high schools (978 ranked).
UC funnel — which kids are getting in at what GPA
Combining the school's applicant pool GPA, admit pool GPA, actual admit rate, and statewide CA admit rates by individual GPA band, we can read which GPA tiers tend to get in — and which don't.
| Campus | 4.00+ GPA | 3.70–3.99 GPA | 3.30–3.69 GPA | < 3.30 GPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UC Berkeley | Real shot | Long odds | Filtered out | Filtered out |
| UC Davis | Strong shot | Strong shot | Real shot | Filtered out |
The numbers behind it
| Campus | Applicant GPA | Admit GPA | Lift ⓘ | Admit rate | vs peer schools @ same GPA ⓘ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UC Berkeley (2023) | 4.17 | 4.27 | +0.10 | 66.7% | Peers +0.13 · matches |
| UC Davis (2024) | 4.09 | 4.22 | +0.13 | 66.7% | Peers +0.16 · matches |
📊 Statewide CA admit rates by individual GPA band, 2025 (for reference)
| GPA band | UCB | UCLA | UCSD | UCSB | UCI | UCD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4.00+ | 17.0% | 15.1% | 45.2% | 62.3% | 46.3% | 65.9% |
| 3.70–3.99 | 3.1% | 1.6% | 9.3% | 17.6% | 17.0% | 31.1% |
| 3.30–3.69 | 0.8% | 0.5% | 1.5% | 2.8% | 2.4% | 10.3% |
| 3.00–3.29 | 0.4% | 0.3% | 0.2% | 0.4% | 0.3% | 1.9% |
| < 3.00 | 0.7% | 0.4% | 0.3% | 0.2% | 0.1% | 0.7% |
UC Outcomes Trend — 2018–2025
Class size from CDE grade 12 enrollment. Campus-level data — applicant/admit totals may count a student at multiple campuses more than once.
Campus Breakdown — 2025
| Campus | Applicants | Admits | Enrollees | Admit Rate | UC Reach | Yield | Avg GPA (App) | Avg GPA (Adm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UC Berkeley → Elite | 5 | —† | —† | —† | —† | — | 3.84 | —† |
| UCLA → Elite | 5 | —† | —† | —† | —† | — | — | —† |
| UC Davis → | 10 | 3 | 3 | 30.0% | 2.5% | 100.0% | 3.93 | —† |
SBAC academic outcomes — grade 11, 2025
Share of grade-11 students meeting or exceeding the California standard on Smarter Balanced ELA and Math. This is the academic-readiness signal that pairs with UC Reach (post-grad outcomes), stability (retention), and absenteeism (engagement). Note: statewide median Math is only ~20% — a school at 20% isn't an outlier; one at 45%+ genuinely is.
Source: California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) Smarter Balanced research files. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥30 tested students.
Student composition — 2025-26
HS grades 9–12 racial/ethnic composition and program subgroups, from CDE Census Day Enrollment. Two-year shift shown when ≥1 pt — surfaces how the community served has changed since 2023-24.
Race / ethnicity
Program subgroups
Source: California Department of Education, Census Day Enrollment 2025-26 (HS grades 9–12). Δ shown when shift is ≥1 pt since 2023-24. Categories below 0.5% omitted.
Chronic absenteeism — 2024-25
Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: grades 9–12.
Absenteeism is up 20.3 pp since 2016-17. A rising absenteeism trend often precedes formal departure — worth investigating which subgroups are driving it.
Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).
Enrollment trend & projection
If this trend holds (+0.4%/yr, Total enrollment)
At per-pupil funding of $ / student:
| Horizon | Projected Total enrollment | Change | Funding impact / yr |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 yr (2027) | ~576 | +2 | $0 |
| 3 yr (2029) | ~581 | +7 | $0 |
| 5 yr (2031) | ~586 | +12 | $0 |
Straight-line extrapolation of the recent annual rate — a what-if, not a forecast of intent. Default = California's LCFF base grant for grades 9–12 ($12,423/ADA). Edit the figure to match your school.
Mckinleyville High School — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot
Public · Mckinleyville · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools
- ▸On UC Reach, Mckinleyville High School sits near the bottom of its similar-school group (ranked #8 of 8): 2% vs. a peer median of 6%.
- ▸Mckinleyville High School's UC Reach has declined meaningfully from a peak of 23% in 2023 to 2% in 2025 — a 21-point drop that warrants attention. Multi-year UC Reach declines of this size often signal something specific (leadership change, comp-program shift, demographic move) rather than year-to-year noise. This is the kind of trajectory an Enrollment Trend Audit unpacks.
- ▸Senior-class enrollment is down 4% (141→135 from 2018 to 2026), trailing the peer-group median of +15%.
- ▸Enrollment has been growing (+0.4%/yr); projects to ~581 by 2029.
Enrollment projection
Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools
| School | Type | Size | UC Reach | Enroll. trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mckinleyville High School | Public | 574 | 2.5% | -4% |
| Peer-group median | 6.2% | +15% | ||
| Alder Grove Charter School 2 | Public | 503 | — | -38% |
| Arcata High School | Public | 972 | 22.0% | +36% |
| Northern United - Humboldt Charter | Public | 349 | — | -6% |
| Eureka Senior High | Public | 1159 | 3.8% | +25% |
| Eureka Senior High School | Public | 1159 | 3.8% | -6% |
| Redwood Coast Montessori | Public | 205 | — | +150% |
| Fortuna Union High School | Public | 832 | 6.2% | +5% |
| Hoopa Valley High School | Public | 349 | 6.8% | +38% |
| Yreka High School | Public | 588 | 6.5% | +20% |
| Central Valley High | Public | 598 | 2.9% | +10% |
UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →
Enrollment stability & demand — 2024-25
Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the Humboldt County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.
Enrollment -4.3% vs. county +41.0% — losing far faster than the county. Each enrolled family matters more, but the engine of new enrollment is breaking down. Chronic absenteeism is also at 40.7% (up +20.3 pts from 2016-17) — engagement and demand are both signaling decline.
77 of 599 students who enrolled at Mckinleyville High School this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (12.9% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.
Stability by student group
Nearest peer high schools
Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2024-25. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.
District financial profile — Northern Humboldt Union High (FY2020)
From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.
Local: 46.2%
Federal: 9.5%
Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the Northern Humboldt Union High as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).