Mayacamas Charter Middle
📄 Shareable scorecard →Compare with peers
Most similar nearby schools
Creekside High → Valley Oak High → San Antonio High (continuation) → Mit Griffin Academy Middle → John Finney High (continuation) → Compare all similar →No UC admissions data on file for Mayacamas Charter Middle.
This school doesn't appear in UCOP's source-school records (it may send few or no applicants to UC). Its enrollment trend and similar-school comparison are still below.
Enrollment stability & demand — 2023-24
Two complementary signals: retention (do students stay once enrolled?) and demand (are families choosing the school?). Read against the Napa County baseline — the demographic tide is moving every CA HS, so a school's gap vs. county is the actionable signal.
23 of 87 students who enrolled at Mayacamas Charter Middle this year didn't maintain continuous enrollment (26.4% non-stability). Mid-year transfers, dropouts, and other exits are all counted.
Stability by student group
Nearest peer high schools
Source: California Department of Education, Stability Rate 2023-24. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 cumulative enrollees so by-design-high-churn continuation schools don't dominate the bottom of the distribution. Cumulative enrollment counts every student on the rolls during the year, so it can exceed peak-day enrollment.
Chronic absenteeism — 2023-24
Share of students missing 10% or more of expected attendance — the leading indicator that often precedes the demand decline shown above. Families disengaging tend to raise absenteeism first, then formally leave. Basis: total enrollment.
Low and stable absenteeism — students are engaged and showing up. The leading indicator is healthy.
Source: California Department of Education, Chronic Absenteeism 2023-24. Benchmarks limited to non-virtual public & charter HS with ≥100 eligible students. CDE didn't publish a usable 2019-20 file (COVID).
District financial profile — Napa County Office of Education (FY2020)
From 4 years of NCES F-33 filings (the federally-mandated district finance survey). Public schools don't have their own books — the district does. These figures show the financial scale, revenue dependence, instruction-vs-overhead mix, and long-term debt that shape what a school can sustain.
Local: 53.4%
Federal: 25.5%
Source: NCES F-33 Annual Survey of School System Finances (Urban Institute Education Data API). Latest year currently published: FY2020. F-33 is a district-level federal filing — it reflects the Napa County Office of Education as a whole, not this individual school's books. Revenue mix shows where the district's dollars come from (state aid dominates in CA via LCFF). Instruction share is current expenditure on instruction ÷ total current expenditure (national benchmark ~60%). Long-term debt is end-of-year outstanding (mostly facilities bonds).
Mayacamas Charter Middle — Enrollment & Outcomes Snapshot
Public · vs. 10 most similar nearby schools
- ▸We don't yet have enough UC-outcome or enrollment history for Mayacamas Charter Middle to build a full trend — but its similar-school comparison is below.
Your school vs. its 10 most similar nearby schools
| School | Type | Size | UC Reach | Enroll. trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mayacamas Charter Middle | Public | 71 | — | — |
| Peer-group median | 6.9% | -26% | ||
| Creekside High | Public | 61 | — | +629% |
| Valley Oak High | Public | 134 | — | -29% |
| San Antonio High (continuation) | Public | 60 | — | -29% |
| Mit Griffin Academy Middle | Public | 130 | — | — |
| John Finney High (continuation) | Public | 130 | — | -47% |
| Liberty High | Public | 48 | — | -23% |
| Petaluma Accelerated Charter | Public | 113 | — | — |
| Griffin Academy High School | Public | 168 | 6.9% | +9% |
| John Finney High School | Public | — | — | — |
| River Montessori Elementary Charter | Public | 141 | — | — |
UC Reach = top-6 UC admits ÷ senior class (can exceed 100% when students are admitted to multiple campuses). Enrollment trend = first-to-latest grade-12 change on file. Similar schools matched on proximity, size, type. Methodology →